下肢自体静脉异体移植治疗危重肢体缺血的疗效评价。reveatec (greffons veineux bioproTEC)研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2025.01.007
Lucie Mercier , Isabelle Javerliat , Jérémie Jayet , Benjamin Hentgen , Guillaume Fadel , Marc Coggia , Laurent Chiche , James Lawton , Raphaël Coscas , Jean-Michel Davaine
{"title":"下肢自体静脉异体移植治疗危重肢体缺血的疗效评价。reveatec (greffons veineux bioproTEC)研究。","authors":"Lucie Mercier ,&nbsp;Isabelle Javerliat ,&nbsp;Jérémie Jayet ,&nbsp;Benjamin Hentgen ,&nbsp;Guillaume Fadel ,&nbsp;Marc Coggia ,&nbsp;Laurent Chiche ,&nbsp;James Lawton ,&nbsp;Raphaël Coscas ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Davaine","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) requires revascularization whenever it is possible. The great saphenous vein represents the surgical conduit of choice. However, it is not always available, in particular in multi-operated patients. In such cases, alternative efficient biological conduits are needed but data remains limited. This study aims at evaluating the performance of cold stored venous allografts provided by Bioprotec® society.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective multi-center cohort. The primary endpoint was limb salvage rate at 1 year following revascularization with cold stored venous allografts. Follow-up based on clinical examination and duplex-scan. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze predictive factors of endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 39 patients (40 limbs) were included between 2018 and 2021. Patients had a median of 2 [0–6] revascularizations prior to inclusion. A total of 97 grafts were used (median of 3 [1–4] grafts per procedure). In the postoperative period (30 days) no death and 4 major amputations were noted. The median length of follow-up was 13.4 [0.7–31.1] months. The 6-months, 1-year and 2-year freedom from major amputation rates were 79% [95% CI: 68–93], 75% (95% CI 62%–91%) and 68% [95% CI: 51–90], respectively. The 6 months, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 95% [88–100], 83% [95% CI: 71–98] and 79% [95% CI: 65–96], respectively. Primary patency rates were 77% [95% CI: 64–91] at 6 months, and 47% [95% CI: 32–70] at one and 2 years. Secondary patency rates were 82% [95% CI: 70–95] at 6 months and 50% [95% CI: 34–73] at one and 2 years. The analysis identified the number of previous revascularizations as a significant risk factor for graft patency (Hazard Ratio: 1.59; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.13–2.24).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Revascularization of CLTI patients with previous failed interventions is highly challenging. The use of cold stored venous allograft showed encouraging limb salvage rate despite modest patency rates and thus may represent an alternative to other substitute in some selected cases. More studies are necessary to identify the potential of CSVA in CLTI patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 116-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Autologous Venous Allograft for Lower Limb in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia. The REVATEC (REVAscularisation Par Greffons Veineux BioproTEC) Study\",\"authors\":\"Lucie Mercier ,&nbsp;Isabelle Javerliat ,&nbsp;Jérémie Jayet ,&nbsp;Benjamin Hentgen ,&nbsp;Guillaume Fadel ,&nbsp;Marc Coggia ,&nbsp;Laurent Chiche ,&nbsp;James Lawton ,&nbsp;Raphaël Coscas ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Davaine\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) requires revascularization whenever it is possible. The great saphenous vein represents the surgical conduit of choice. However, it is not always available, in particular in multi-operated patients. In such cases, alternative efficient biological conduits are needed but data remains limited. This study aims at evaluating the performance of cold stored venous allografts provided by Bioprotec® society.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective multi-center cohort. The primary endpoint was limb salvage rate at 1 year following revascularization with cold stored venous allografts. Follow-up based on clinical examination and duplex-scan. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze predictive factors of endpoints.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 39 patients (40 limbs) were included between 2018 and 2021. Patients had a median of 2 [0–6] revascularizations prior to inclusion. A total of 97 grafts were used (median of 3 [1–4] grafts per procedure). In the postoperative period (30 days) no death and 4 major amputations were noted. The median length of follow-up was 13.4 [0.7–31.1] months. The 6-months, 1-year and 2-year freedom from major amputation rates were 79% [95% CI: 68–93], 75% (95% CI 62%–91%) and 68% [95% CI: 51–90], respectively. The 6 months, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 95% [88–100], 83% [95% CI: 71–98] and 79% [95% CI: 65–96], respectively. Primary patency rates were 77% [95% CI: 64–91] at 6 months, and 47% [95% CI: 32–70] at one and 2 years. Secondary patency rates were 82% [95% CI: 70–95] at 6 months and 50% [95% CI: 34–73] at one and 2 years. The analysis identified the number of previous revascularizations as a significant risk factor for graft patency (Hazard Ratio: 1.59; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.13–2.24).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Revascularization of CLTI patients with previous failed interventions is highly challenging. The use of cold stored venous allograft showed encouraging limb salvage rate despite modest patency rates and thus may represent an alternative to other substitute in some selected cases. More studies are necessary to identify the potential of CSVA in CLTI patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 116-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509625000123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509625000123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)需要在任何可能的情况下进行血运重建。大隐静脉是首选的手术导管。然而,它并不总是可用的,特别是在多次手术的患者中。在这种情况下,需要其他有效的生物管道,但数据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估由Bioprotec®society提供的冷冻异体静脉移植物的性能。方法:前瞻性多中心队列研究。研究的主要终点是冷储存异体静脉移植物血运重建术后一年的肢体恢复率。随访基于临床检查和双工扫描。采用单因素和多因素分析来分析终点的预测因素。结果:2018 - 2021年间共纳入39例患者(40条肢体)。入组前患者的血运重建术中位数为2次[0-6]。总共使用了97个移植物(平均每个手术3个[1-4]移植物)。术后30天无死亡,4例主要截肢。中位随访时间为13.4[0.7 ~ 31.1]个月。6个月、1年和2年的截肢率分别为79% [95% CI: 68-93]、75% [95% CI: 62-91]和68% [95% CI: 51-90]。6个月、1年和2年生存率分别为95%[88-100]、83% [95% CI: 71-98]和79% [95% CI: 65-96]。6个月时原发性通畅率为77% [95% CI: 64-91], 1年和2年通畅率为47% [95% CI: 32-70]。6个月时继发通畅率为82% [95% CI: 70-95], 1年和2年时为50% [95% CI: 34-73]。分析发现,以前的血运重建次数是移植物通畅的一个重要危险因素(危险比:1.59;95%置信区间:1.13-2.24)。结论:先前干预失败的CLTI患者的血运重建术极具挑战性。尽管开放率不高,但冷冻静脉异体移植物的使用显示出令人鼓舞的肢体保留率,因此在某些选定的病例中可能是其他替代品的替代方案。需要更多的研究来确定CSVA在CLTI患者中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Autologous Venous Allograft for Lower Limb in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia. The REVATEC (REVAscularisation Par Greffons Veineux BioproTEC) Study

Background

Critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) requires revascularization whenever it is possible. The great saphenous vein represents the surgical conduit of choice. However, it is not always available, in particular in multi-operated patients. In such cases, alternative efficient biological conduits are needed but data remains limited. This study aims at evaluating the performance of cold stored venous allografts provided by Bioprotec® society.

Methods

Prospective multi-center cohort. The primary endpoint was limb salvage rate at 1 year following revascularization with cold stored venous allografts. Follow-up based on clinical examination and duplex-scan. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze predictive factors of endpoints.

Results

Overall, 39 patients (40 limbs) were included between 2018 and 2021. Patients had a median of 2 [0–6] revascularizations prior to inclusion. A total of 97 grafts were used (median of 3 [1–4] grafts per procedure). In the postoperative period (30 days) no death and 4 major amputations were noted. The median length of follow-up was 13.4 [0.7–31.1] months. The 6-months, 1-year and 2-year freedom from major amputation rates were 79% [95% CI: 68–93], 75% (95% CI 62%–91%) and 68% [95% CI: 51–90], respectively. The 6 months, 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 95% [88–100], 83% [95% CI: 71–98] and 79% [95% CI: 65–96], respectively. Primary patency rates were 77% [95% CI: 64–91] at 6 months, and 47% [95% CI: 32–70] at one and 2 years. Secondary patency rates were 82% [95% CI: 70–95] at 6 months and 50% [95% CI: 34–73] at one and 2 years. The analysis identified the number of previous revascularizations as a significant risk factor for graft patency (Hazard Ratio: 1.59; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.13–2.24).

Conclusion

Revascularization of CLTI patients with previous failed interventions is highly challenging. The use of cold stored venous allograft showed encouraging limb salvage rate despite modest patency rates and thus may represent an alternative to other substitute in some selected cases. More studies are necessary to identify the potential of CSVA in CLTI patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Variability in Duplex-Derived Carotid Flow Parameters in Symptomatic Patients Awaiting Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Artery Intervention May Still Be Justified in Asymptomatic Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Machine Learning Models Used to Predict Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth and Rupture: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal Saphenous Vein Arterialization for Limb Salvage in Unreconstructable Peripheral Arterial Disease: Long-Term Results Use of Alternative Endograft for Popliteal Artery Aneurysm Endovascular Repair: A Single Center Experience in Italy With the Wrapsody™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1