Qnox指数量化术中痛觉和镇痛:一项前瞻性单中心验证研究。

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.051
Hao Kong , Dan-Dan Ma , Jia-Hui Ma , Yu-Xiu Zhang , Hong Zhang , Dong-Xin Wang
{"title":"Qnox指数量化术中痛觉和镇痛:一项前瞻性单中心验证研究。","authors":"Hao Kong ,&nbsp;Dan-Dan Ma ,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Ma ,&nbsp;Yu-Xiu Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong Zhang ,&nbsp;Dong-Xin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Qnox index is a novel monitor to quantify intraoperative nociception based on an electroencephalographic algorithm. We evaluated the ability of the Qnox index to discriminate noxious from non-noxious stimuli, respond to stimuli, and discriminate different levels of analgesia in patients under propofol anaesthesia with neuromuscular block.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qnox was compared with heart rate and mean arterial pressure with five designated stimuli: tetanic stimulations without (tetanic 1) and with sufentanil (tetanic 2), skin incision, tracheal intubation, and a non-noxious period. The response around the skin incision was also evaluated at two target remifentanil concentrations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 83 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery, Qnox performed worse than heart rate and mean arterial pressure in discriminating tetanic 2, tetanic 1, skin incision, and tracheal intubation noxious stimuli from the non-noxious period, with an area under curve of 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.43–0.61), 0.54 (0.45–0.62), 0.67 (0.58–0.75), and 0.65 (0.57–0.73), respectively. The post-stimulus values of Qnox increased significantly after tracheal intubation and skin incision, but not after tetanic 1 or tetanic 2. Qnox values after skin incision were similar between the low- and high-remifentanil-concentration groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Qnox had a poor ability to discriminate noxious stimuli from non-noxious stimuli. Although Qnox responded to tracheal intubation and skin incision, it did not respond to tetanic stimulations and failed to discriminate different levels of analgesia. The Qnox index was not superior to heart rate or mean arterial pressure in assessing nociception during general anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100046063).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 3","pages":"Pages 736-745"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qnox index for quantification of intraoperative nociception and analgesia: a prospective single-centre validation study\",\"authors\":\"Hao Kong ,&nbsp;Dan-Dan Ma ,&nbsp;Jia-Hui Ma ,&nbsp;Yu-Xiu Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong Zhang ,&nbsp;Dong-Xin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Qnox index is a novel monitor to quantify intraoperative nociception based on an electroencephalographic algorithm. We evaluated the ability of the Qnox index to discriminate noxious from non-noxious stimuli, respond to stimuli, and discriminate different levels of analgesia in patients under propofol anaesthesia with neuromuscular block.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qnox was compared with heart rate and mean arterial pressure with five designated stimuli: tetanic stimulations without (tetanic 1) and with sufentanil (tetanic 2), skin incision, tracheal intubation, and a non-noxious period. The response around the skin incision was also evaluated at two target remifentanil concentrations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 83 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery, Qnox performed worse than heart rate and mean arterial pressure in discriminating tetanic 2, tetanic 1, skin incision, and tracheal intubation noxious stimuli from the non-noxious period, with an area under curve of 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.43–0.61), 0.54 (0.45–0.62), 0.67 (0.58–0.75), and 0.65 (0.57–0.73), respectively. The post-stimulus values of Qnox increased significantly after tracheal intubation and skin incision, but not after tetanic 1 or tetanic 2. Qnox values after skin incision were similar between the low- and high-remifentanil-concentration groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Qnox had a poor ability to discriminate noxious stimuli from non-noxious stimuli. Although Qnox responded to tracheal intubation and skin incision, it did not respond to tetanic stimulations and failed to discriminate different levels of analgesia. The Qnox index was not superior to heart rate or mean arterial pressure in assessing nociception during general anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100046063).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"134 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 736-745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224007542\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224007542","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Qnox指数是一种基于脑电图算法量化术中伤害感受的新型监测仪。我们评估了Qnox指数在异丙酚麻醉联合神经肌肉阻滞患者中区分有害和无害刺激、对刺激的反应以及区分不同程度镇痛的能力。方法:比较Qnox在5种指定刺激下的心率和平均动脉压:无破伤风刺激(破伤风1)和舒芬太尼刺激(破伤风2)、皮肤切开、气管插管和非毒性期。皮肤切口周围的反应也在两种目标瑞芬太尼浓度下进行了评估。结果:在83例择期手术的成人患者中,Qnox在区分破伤风2、破伤风1、皮肤切口和气管插管有害刺激与非有害刺激时的表现差于心率和平均动脉压,曲线下面积分别为0.52(95%可信区间0.43-0.61)、0.54(0.45-0.62)、0.67(0.58-0.75)和0.65(0.57-0.73)。Qnox刺激后值在气管插管和皮肤切开后显著升高,但在破伤风1和破伤风2后无显著升高。瑞芬太尼低浓度组和高浓度组皮肤切开后Qnox值相似。结论:Qnox对有害刺激和非有害刺激的区分能力较差。虽然Qnox对气管插管和皮肤切开有反应,但对强直刺激无反应,不能区分不同程度的镇痛。在评估全身麻醉期间的伤害感受时,Qnox指数并不优于心率或平均动脉压。临床试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2100046063)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qnox index for quantification of intraoperative nociception and analgesia: a prospective single-centre validation study

Background

The Qnox index is a novel monitor to quantify intraoperative nociception based on an electroencephalographic algorithm. We evaluated the ability of the Qnox index to discriminate noxious from non-noxious stimuli, respond to stimuli, and discriminate different levels of analgesia in patients under propofol anaesthesia with neuromuscular block.

Methods

Qnox was compared with heart rate and mean arterial pressure with five designated stimuli: tetanic stimulations without (tetanic 1) and with sufentanil (tetanic 2), skin incision, tracheal intubation, and a non-noxious period. The response around the skin incision was also evaluated at two target remifentanil concentrations.

Results

In 83 adult patients scheduled for elective surgery, Qnox performed worse than heart rate and mean arterial pressure in discriminating tetanic 2, tetanic 1, skin incision, and tracheal intubation noxious stimuli from the non-noxious period, with an area under curve of 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.43–0.61), 0.54 (0.45–0.62), 0.67 (0.58–0.75), and 0.65 (0.57–0.73), respectively. The post-stimulus values of Qnox increased significantly after tracheal intubation and skin incision, but not after tetanic 1 or tetanic 2. Qnox values after skin incision were similar between the low- and high-remifentanil-concentration groups.

Conclusions

Qnox had a poor ability to discriminate noxious stimuli from non-noxious stimuli. Although Qnox responded to tracheal intubation and skin incision, it did not respond to tetanic stimulations and failed to discriminate different levels of analgesia. The Qnox index was not superior to heart rate or mean arterial pressure in assessing nociception during general anaesthesia.

Clinical trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100046063).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
Single-dose intraoperative methadone and QTc interval: a prospective observational cohort investigation. Audit of procedural sedation complications using a novel digital application. Social deprivation and morbidity and mortality after surgery. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2025; 135: 1193-1202. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis and dose optimisation of ciprofol in paediatric anaesthesia. Postoperative outcomes in older patients with postoperative delirium in the UK: timing of postoperative delirium screening in the SNAP-3 study. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2026; 136: 1578-87.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1