Yves Renard , Sina Grape , Erin Gonvers , Jean-Benoit Rossel , Patrick Goetti , Eric Albrecht
{"title":"筋膜外注射斜角肌间臂丛阻滞后局部麻醉量对呼吸的影响:一项随机对照双盲试验","authors":"Yves Renard , Sina Grape , Erin Gonvers , Jean-Benoit Rossel , Patrick Goetti , Eric Albrecht","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We have previously demonstrated that an extrafascial injection of 20 ml of local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) reduces the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by 70% compared with an intrafascial injection, with similar efficacy. In this double-blind trial, we tested the hypothesis that a local anaesthetic volume of 10 ml injected extrafascially would reduce the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis <em>vs</em> a volume of 20 ml, while providing similar analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty ASA physical status 1–3 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided extrafascial ISB using ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml (control group) or 10 ml (low-volume group) injected lateral to the brachial plexus sheath. The primary outcome was incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (diaphragmatic excursion reduction of >75%), measured by M-mode ultrasonography, at 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia and i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 30-min hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–91%) in the control group and 19% (95% CI 8–40%) in the low-volume group (<em>P</em><0.001). Participants in the low-volume <em>vs</em> control group had a shorter duration of analgesia (550 <em>vs</em> 873 min; <em>P</em><0.01) and higher i.v. morphine consumption (20 <em>vs</em> 12 mg; <em>P</em>=0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A low volume of local anaesthetic injected extrafascially reduced the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, but at the expense of a shorter duration of analgesia compared with standard-dose extrafascial anaesthetic injection.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT04726280.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":"134 4","pages":"Pages 1153-1160"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory impact of local anaesthetic volume after interscalene brachial plexus block with extrafascial injection: a randomised controlled double-blinded trial\",\"authors\":\"Yves Renard , Sina Grape , Erin Gonvers , Jean-Benoit Rossel , Patrick Goetti , Eric Albrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>We have previously demonstrated that an extrafascial injection of 20 ml of local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) reduces the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by 70% compared with an intrafascial injection, with similar efficacy. In this double-blind trial, we tested the hypothesis that a local anaesthetic volume of 10 ml injected extrafascially would reduce the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis <em>vs</em> a volume of 20 ml, while providing similar analgesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty ASA physical status 1–3 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided extrafascial ISB using ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml (control group) or 10 ml (low-volume group) injected lateral to the brachial plexus sheath. The primary outcome was incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (diaphragmatic excursion reduction of >75%), measured by M-mode ultrasonography, at 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia and i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 30-min hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–91%) in the control group and 19% (95% CI 8–40%) in the low-volume group (<em>P</em><0.001). Participants in the low-volume <em>vs</em> control group had a shorter duration of analgesia (550 <em>vs</em> 873 min; <em>P</em><0.01) and higher i.v. morphine consumption (20 <em>vs</em> 12 mg; <em>P</em>=0.03).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A low volume of local anaesthetic injected extrafascially reduced the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, but at the expense of a shorter duration of analgesia compared with standard-dose extrafascial anaesthetic injection.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><div>NCT04726280.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"134 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1153-1160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224007529\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224007529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:我们之前已经证明,与筋膜内注射相比,筋膜外注射20ml局部麻醉剂治疗斜角肌间臂丛神经阻滞(ISB)可将半膈肌麻痹的发生率降低70%,效果相似。在这项双盲试验中,我们验证了一个假设,即筋膜外注射10ml的局部麻醉量与20ml的局部麻醉量相比,可以降低半膈肌麻痹的发生率,同时提供类似的镇痛效果。方法:60例ASA身体状态1 ~ 3例全麻择期肩关节手术患者随机分为两组,分别采用0.75%罗哌卡因20 ml(对照组)或10 ml(低容量组)在臂丛鞘外侧注射,接受超声引导下的筋膜外ISB治疗。主要终点是术后30分钟m型超声测量的半膈肌麻痹发生率(膈肌偏移减少75%)。次要结局包括术后24小时镇痛持续时间和静脉注射吗啡用量。结果:对照组30分钟半膈肌麻痹率为80%(95%可信区间[CI] 61-91%),低剂量组为19% (95% CI 8-40%)。结论:低剂量筋膜外局部麻醉可降低半膈肌麻痹率,但与标准剂量筋膜外麻醉相比,其镇痛持续时间较短。临床试验注册:NCT04726280。
Respiratory impact of local anaesthetic volume after interscalene brachial plexus block with extrafascial injection: a randomised controlled double-blinded trial
Background
We have previously demonstrated that an extrafascial injection of 20 ml of local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) reduces the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by 70% compared with an intrafascial injection, with similar efficacy. In this double-blind trial, we tested the hypothesis that a local anaesthetic volume of 10 ml injected extrafascially would reduce the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis vs a volume of 20 ml, while providing similar analgesia.
Methods
Sixty ASA physical status 1–3 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided extrafascial ISB using ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml (control group) or 10 ml (low-volume group) injected lateral to the brachial plexus sheath. The primary outcome was incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (diaphragmatic excursion reduction of >75%), measured by M-mode ultrasonography, at 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia and i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery.
Results
The 30-min hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61–91%) in the control group and 19% (95% CI 8–40%) in the low-volume group (P<0.001). Participants in the low-volume vs control group had a shorter duration of analgesia (550 vs 873 min; P<0.01) and higher i.v. morphine consumption (20 vs 12 mg; P=0.03).
Conclusions
A low volume of local anaesthetic injected extrafascially reduced the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, but at the expense of a shorter duration of analgesia compared with standard-dose extrafascial anaesthetic injection.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.