Nissim Ohana, Omer Marom, David Segal, Refael Behrbalk, Yuval Ben-Sira, Alex Tavdi, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Eyal Yaacobi
{"title":"股骨头病理学在髋关节下骨折:230例病例系列的临床价值和成本效益。","authors":"Nissim Ohana, Omer Marom, David Segal, Refael Behrbalk, Yuval Ben-Sira, Alex Tavdi, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Eyal Yaacobi","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Osteoporotic fractures, particularly subcapital hip fractures (SCF), pose a significant healthcare and economic burden. The routine pathological examination of resected femoral heads in such cases is common practice, aimed at identifying malignancies that may have contributed to bone fragility. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness and clinical utility of routine femoral head pathology in patients undergoing surgical treatment for SCF. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing surgical treatment for SCF between 2015 and 2018, with available femoral head pathology reports, were included. Data on demographics, prior or active malignancies, surgical procedures, and pathology results were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The study included 230 patients with a mean age of 82.4 ± 14.1 years, of whom 57% were female. A total of 72 (31%) patients had a history of malignancy at the time of surgery. Pathological examination identified malignancies in eight patients (3.4%), all of whom had active malignancies at the time of admission. The most common malignancies detected were breast cancer and multiple myeloma (three cases each). None of the findings led to changes in patient management. <b>Conclusions:</b> The routine pathological examination of femoral heads following SCF provided a limited diagnostic yield and did not alter clinical management in this cohort. These findings suggest that routine pathology may not be cost-effective and support the adoption of selective screening approaches based on clinical risk factors such as a history of malignancy or atypical fracture presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764477/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femoral Head Pathology in Subcapital Hip Fractures: Clinical Value and Cost-Effectiveness in a 230-Patient Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"Nissim Ohana, Omer Marom, David Segal, Refael Behrbalk, Yuval Ben-Sira, Alex Tavdi, Ezequiel Palmanovich, Eyal Yaacobi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15020234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Osteoporotic fractures, particularly subcapital hip fractures (SCF), pose a significant healthcare and economic burden. The routine pathological examination of resected femoral heads in such cases is common practice, aimed at identifying malignancies that may have contributed to bone fragility. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness and clinical utility of routine femoral head pathology in patients undergoing surgical treatment for SCF. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing surgical treatment for SCF between 2015 and 2018, with available femoral head pathology reports, were included. Data on demographics, prior or active malignancies, surgical procedures, and pathology results were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The study included 230 patients with a mean age of 82.4 ± 14.1 years, of whom 57% were female. A total of 72 (31%) patients had a history of malignancy at the time of surgery. Pathological examination identified malignancies in eight patients (3.4%), all of whom had active malignancies at the time of admission. The most common malignancies detected were breast cancer and multiple myeloma (three cases each). None of the findings led to changes in patient management. <b>Conclusions:</b> The routine pathological examination of femoral heads following SCF provided a limited diagnostic yield and did not alter clinical management in this cohort. These findings suggest that routine pathology may not be cost-effective and support the adoption of selective screening approaches based on clinical risk factors such as a history of malignancy or atypical fracture presentations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11764477/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020234\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Femoral Head Pathology in Subcapital Hip Fractures: Clinical Value and Cost-Effectiveness in a 230-Patient Case Series.
Background/Objectives: Osteoporotic fractures, particularly subcapital hip fractures (SCF), pose a significant healthcare and economic burden. The routine pathological examination of resected femoral heads in such cases is common practice, aimed at identifying malignancies that may have contributed to bone fragility. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness and clinical utility of routine femoral head pathology in patients undergoing surgical treatment for SCF. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing surgical treatment for SCF between 2015 and 2018, with available femoral head pathology reports, were included. Data on demographics, prior or active malignancies, surgical procedures, and pathology results were analyzed. Results: The study included 230 patients with a mean age of 82.4 ± 14.1 years, of whom 57% were female. A total of 72 (31%) patients had a history of malignancy at the time of surgery. Pathological examination identified malignancies in eight patients (3.4%), all of whom had active malignancies at the time of admission. The most common malignancies detected were breast cancer and multiple myeloma (three cases each). None of the findings led to changes in patient management. Conclusions: The routine pathological examination of femoral heads following SCF provided a limited diagnostic yield and did not alter clinical management in this cohort. These findings suggest that routine pathology may not be cost-effective and support the adoption of selective screening approaches based on clinical risk factors such as a history of malignancy or atypical fracture presentations.
DiagnosticsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍:
Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.