新的组织学前列腺炎症评分有助于确定前列腺活检中基质和腺体炎症与前列腺癌风险之间的关系。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics15020166
Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Francesca Sanguedolce, Angelo Cormio, Antonella Ninivaggi, Marco Finati, Francesco Guzzi, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Daniele Castellani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Luigi Cormio
{"title":"新的组织学前列腺炎症评分有助于确定前列腺活检中基质和腺体炎症与前列腺癌风险之间的关系。","authors":"Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Francesca Sanguedolce, Angelo Cormio, Antonella Ninivaggi, Marco Finati, Francesco Guzzi, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Daniele Castellani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Luigi Cormio","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15020166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is emerging evidence of an inverse association between prostatic inflammation (PI) and prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and outcome. The Irani score, a validated system that scores PI according to the grade of stromal infiltration (Irani G) and the aggressiveness of glandular infiltration (Irani A), has indeed been found to be inversely associated with PCa diagnosis and outcome, but the presence of two categories (G and A) makes the performance of this score suboptimal. This study aimed to determine whether a novel prostatic inflammation score (PIS) that combines Irani G and A scores better defined the risk of being diagnosed with PCa at prostate biopsy (PBx). <b>Methods:</b> Between January 2013 and December 2023, the Irani scores were routinely assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained PBx cores. The novel PIS was obtained by combining Irani G and A scores by their kernel distribution. PIS 1 included patients who scored G 0-1/A 0-1, PIS 2 those who scored G 2-3/A 0-1, and PIS 3 included those who scored G 0-3/A 2-3. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between the novel PIS and the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and clinically significant (cs) PCa at PBx. <b>Results:</b> Among the 4620 eligible patients, PCa and csPCa detection rate was 47% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 3088 (66.8%) had low Irani G and 4041 (87.5%) had low Irani A scores. Using PIS, 2971 (64%) were classified as PIS 1, 1070 (23%) as PIS 2, and 579 (13%) as PIS 3. Notably, almost one-quarter of patients had heterogeneous Irani features. Multivariable analysis pointed out a significant association between PIS and the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and csPCa; the higher the PIS, the lower the likelihood of such diagnoses. Limitations included the absence of external validation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The novel PIS, easily obtained during routine pathology examination, was significantly associated with the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and csPCa at PBx. While PI seems to be overall protective over PCa, the different types (stromal vs. glandular) of inflammation depicted by PIS seem to express a different risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Novel Histological Prostatic Inflammation Score Helps Defining the Association Between Stromal and Glandular Inflammation with the Risk of Prostate Cancer at Prostate Biopsy.\",\"authors\":\"Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Francesca Sanguedolce, Angelo Cormio, Antonella Ninivaggi, Marco Finati, Francesco Guzzi, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Daniele Castellani, Giuseppe Carrieri, Luigi Cormio\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15020166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> There is emerging evidence of an inverse association between prostatic inflammation (PI) and prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and outcome. The Irani score, a validated system that scores PI according to the grade of stromal infiltration (Irani G) and the aggressiveness of glandular infiltration (Irani A), has indeed been found to be inversely associated with PCa diagnosis and outcome, but the presence of two categories (G and A) makes the performance of this score suboptimal. This study aimed to determine whether a novel prostatic inflammation score (PIS) that combines Irani G and A scores better defined the risk of being diagnosed with PCa at prostate biopsy (PBx). <b>Methods:</b> Between January 2013 and December 2023, the Irani scores were routinely assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained PBx cores. The novel PIS was obtained by combining Irani G and A scores by their kernel distribution. PIS 1 included patients who scored G 0-1/A 0-1, PIS 2 those who scored G 2-3/A 0-1, and PIS 3 included those who scored G 0-3/A 2-3. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between the novel PIS and the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and clinically significant (cs) PCa at PBx. <b>Results:</b> Among the 4620 eligible patients, PCa and csPCa detection rate was 47% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 3088 (66.8%) had low Irani G and 4041 (87.5%) had low Irani A scores. Using PIS, 2971 (64%) were classified as PIS 1, 1070 (23%) as PIS 2, and 579 (13%) as PIS 3. Notably, almost one-quarter of patients had heterogeneous Irani features. Multivariable analysis pointed out a significant association between PIS and the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and csPCa; the higher the PIS, the lower the likelihood of such diagnoses. Limitations included the absence of external validation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The novel PIS, easily obtained during routine pathology examination, was significantly associated with the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and csPCa at PBx. While PI seems to be overall protective over PCa, the different types (stromal vs. glandular) of inflammation depicted by PIS seem to express a different risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11763971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的证据表明前列腺炎症(PI)与前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断和预后呈负相关。Irani评分是一种经过验证的系统,根据基质浸润的等级(Irani G)和腺体浸润的侵袭性(Irani a)对PI进行评分,确实发现与PCa的诊断和结果呈负相关,但两个类别(G和a)的存在使得该评分的表现不理想。本研究旨在确定一种结合Irani G和a评分的新型前列腺炎症评分(PIS)是否能更好地定义前列腺活检(PBx)诊断为前列腺癌的风险。方法:在2013年1月至2023年12月期间,对苏木精和伊红染色的PBx核进行伊朗评分。将伊朗的G和A分数根据核分布进行组合,得到了新的PIS。PIS 1为评分为G 0-1/A 0-1的患者,PIS 2为评分为G 2-3/A 0-1的患者,PIS 3为评分为G 0-3/A 2-3的患者。采用Logistic回归分析来检验新型PIS与PBx诊断为PCa和临床显著性PCa的风险之间的关系。结果:4620例符合条件的患者中,PCa和csPCa检出率分别为47%和25%。总体而言,3088人(66.8%)的伊朗语G分较低,4041人(87.5%)的伊朗语A分较低。使用PIS将2971例(64%)归为PIS 1, 1070例(23%)归为PIS 2, 579例(13%)归为PIS 3。值得注意的是,近四分之一的患者具有异质的伊朗特征。多变量分析指出PIS与被诊断为PCa和csPCa的风险之间存在显著相关性;PIS越高,这种诊断的可能性越低。局限性包括缺乏外部验证。结论:在常规病理检查中容易获得的新型PIS与PBx诊断为PCa和csPCa的风险显著相关。虽然PI似乎对PCa具有总体保护作用,但PIS所描述的不同类型(间质与腺体)炎症似乎表达了不同的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Novel Histological Prostatic Inflammation Score Helps Defining the Association Between Stromal and Glandular Inflammation with the Risk of Prostate Cancer at Prostate Biopsy.

Background: There is emerging evidence of an inverse association between prostatic inflammation (PI) and prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and outcome. The Irani score, a validated system that scores PI according to the grade of stromal infiltration (Irani G) and the aggressiveness of glandular infiltration (Irani A), has indeed been found to be inversely associated with PCa diagnosis and outcome, but the presence of two categories (G and A) makes the performance of this score suboptimal. This study aimed to determine whether a novel prostatic inflammation score (PIS) that combines Irani G and A scores better defined the risk of being diagnosed with PCa at prostate biopsy (PBx). Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2023, the Irani scores were routinely assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained PBx cores. The novel PIS was obtained by combining Irani G and A scores by their kernel distribution. PIS 1 included patients who scored G 0-1/A 0-1, PIS 2 those who scored G 2-3/A 0-1, and PIS 3 included those who scored G 0-3/A 2-3. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association between the novel PIS and the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and clinically significant (cs) PCa at PBx. Results: Among the 4620 eligible patients, PCa and csPCa detection rate was 47% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 3088 (66.8%) had low Irani G and 4041 (87.5%) had low Irani A scores. Using PIS, 2971 (64%) were classified as PIS 1, 1070 (23%) as PIS 2, and 579 (13%) as PIS 3. Notably, almost one-quarter of patients had heterogeneous Irani features. Multivariable analysis pointed out a significant association between PIS and the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and csPCa; the higher the PIS, the lower the likelihood of such diagnoses. Limitations included the absence of external validation. Conclusions: The novel PIS, easily obtained during routine pathology examination, was significantly associated with the risk of being diagnosed with PCa and csPCa at PBx. While PI seems to be overall protective over PCa, the different types (stromal vs. glandular) of inflammation depicted by PIS seem to express a different risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Radiographic Angle-Based Machine Learning Models for the Diagnosis of Pes Planus and Pes Cavus: A Large-Scale Study Using Weight-Bearing Lateral Foot Radiographs. Early Rectal Cancer: Diagnostic Challenges and the Role of Endoscopic Intermuscular Dissection Within the Therapeutic Algorithm. Multivalvular Carcinoid Heart Disease: The Role of Echocardiography in Diagnosis and Selection for Heterotopic Bicaval Valve Implantation. Vertebrogenic Low Back Pain and Basivertebral Nerve Ablation: A Review of Mechanisms, Imaging-Driven Selection, and Clinical Outcomes. Selective Inhibition of Insulin-Degrading Enzyme Eliminates Hemolysis Interference in Serum Insulin Measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1