P. C. Lin, C. H. Huang, J. H. Wu, Y. C. Lin, Koichiro Matsuo, H. L. Huang
{"title":"社区居住老年人的口腔功能和各种烹饪方法与咀嚼到吞咽时间的关系。","authors":"P. C. Lin, C. H. Huang, J. H. Wu, Y. C. Lin, Koichiro Matsuo, H. L. Huang","doi":"10.1111/joor.13946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Oral frailty in older adults can affect their eating efficiency, prolonging meal times, which can compromise food flavour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study explored the association between cooking methods and chewing-to-swallowing time on the basis of different oral functions in older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study involved 65 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Chewing-to-swallowing time was measured as participants tested the textures of two ingredients—chicken breast and baby Chinese cabbage—prepared using four cooking methods (boiling, <i>sous vide</i>, confit and high-pressure). Oral frailty was determined by the following items: tooth count, bite force, saliva secretion rate, swallowing, tongue-lip motor function and oral hygiene. Regression models analysed the correlation between cooking methods and chewing-to-swallowing time under various oral functions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No differences in chewing-to-swallowing time were found for chicken prepared using the various cooking methods among older adults with oral frailty (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). However, for older adults without oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for both <i>sous vide</i> (<i>β</i> = −1.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and confit chicken (β = −1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.003) than for boiled chicken. For older adults with oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for <i>sous vide</i> (<i>β</i> = −0.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and high-pressure methods (<i>β</i> = −1.16, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than for boiled vegetable. For older adults without oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for high-pressure methods (<i>β</i> = −0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than for boiled vegetable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Under different oral functional conditions, cooking methods are associated with the chewing and swallowing times of older adults.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"52 6","pages":"883-895"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral Functions and Various Cooking Methods Associated With Chewing-To-Swallowing Time in Community-Dwelling Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"P. C. Lin, C. H. Huang, J. H. Wu, Y. C. Lin, Koichiro Matsuo, H. L. Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joor.13946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Oral frailty in older adults can affect their eating efficiency, prolonging meal times, which can compromise food flavour.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study explored the association between cooking methods and chewing-to-swallowing time on the basis of different oral functions in older adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study involved 65 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Chewing-to-swallowing time was measured as participants tested the textures of two ingredients—chicken breast and baby Chinese cabbage—prepared using four cooking methods (boiling, <i>sous vide</i>, confit and high-pressure). Oral frailty was determined by the following items: tooth count, bite force, saliva secretion rate, swallowing, tongue-lip motor function and oral hygiene. Regression models analysed the correlation between cooking methods and chewing-to-swallowing time under various oral functions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No differences in chewing-to-swallowing time were found for chicken prepared using the various cooking methods among older adults with oral frailty (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). However, for older adults without oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for both <i>sous vide</i> (<i>β</i> = −1.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and confit chicken (β = −1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.003) than for boiled chicken. For older adults with oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for <i>sous vide</i> (<i>β</i> = −0.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and high-pressure methods (<i>β</i> = −1.16, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than for boiled vegetable. For older adults without oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for high-pressure methods (<i>β</i> = −0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than for boiled vegetable.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Under different oral functional conditions, cooking methods are associated with the chewing and swallowing times of older adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"883-895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Oral Functions and Various Cooking Methods Associated With Chewing-To-Swallowing Time in Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Background
Oral frailty in older adults can affect their eating efficiency, prolonging meal times, which can compromise food flavour.
Objective
This study explored the association between cooking methods and chewing-to-swallowing time on the basis of different oral functions in older adults.
Methods
This cross-sectional study involved 65 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Chewing-to-swallowing time was measured as participants tested the textures of two ingredients—chicken breast and baby Chinese cabbage—prepared using four cooking methods (boiling, sous vide, confit and high-pressure). Oral frailty was determined by the following items: tooth count, bite force, saliva secretion rate, swallowing, tongue-lip motor function and oral hygiene. Regression models analysed the correlation between cooking methods and chewing-to-swallowing time under various oral functions.
Results
No differences in chewing-to-swallowing time were found for chicken prepared using the various cooking methods among older adults with oral frailty (all p > 0.05). However, for older adults without oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for both sous vide (β = −1.06, p < 0.001) and confit chicken (β = −1.79, p = 0.003) than for boiled chicken. For older adults with oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for sous vide (β = −0.06, p < 0.001) and high-pressure methods (β = −1.16, p < 0.001) than for boiled vegetable. For older adults without oral frailty had a shorter chewing-to-swallowing time for high-pressure methods (β = −0.83, p < 0.001) than for boiled vegetable.
Conclusion
Under different oral functional conditions, cooking methods are associated with the chewing and swallowing times of older adults.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.