通过健康干预支持父母向为人父母过渡;国际范围审查。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2025.104296
Georgia Middleton , Karen Matvienko-Sikar , Annette Briley , Dimity Dutch , Samantha Morgillo , Jacqueline Anderson , Natasha Schranz , Fiona Margrie , Rachel Kirby , Rebecca K Golley , Sarah C Hunter
{"title":"通过健康干预支持父母向为人父母过渡;国际范围审查。","authors":"Georgia Middleton ,&nbsp;Karen Matvienko-Sikar ,&nbsp;Annette Briley ,&nbsp;Dimity Dutch ,&nbsp;Samantha Morgillo ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Anderson ,&nbsp;Natasha Schranz ,&nbsp;Fiona Margrie ,&nbsp;Rachel Kirby ,&nbsp;Rebecca K Golley ,&nbsp;Sarah C Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Many first-time parents experience poor wellbeing during the transition to parenthood.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transition to parenthood can be challenging, with consequences to wellbeing for many first-time parents. While parents are often well-supported to care for their children, there are minimal supports available to care for themselves. To support parents in caring for their children, they need to be supported in their own care.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What evidence-based universal interventions supporting parent wellbeing from conception to 12 months post birth exist?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping search across four databases to identify studies measuring and reporting wellbeing outcomes of parents who participated in a prevention intervention aiming to improve wellbeing.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Seventy-four studies, reporting on 70 unique interventions, were included. Interventions were grouped into eight categories depending on their main mechanism of focus. Studies measured a range of wellbeing outcomes. Thirty-five studies provided evidence of effectiveness across all their reported outcomes. These interventions ranged across the different categories of focus, typically included mothers-only, were delivered post-birth, by a facilitator, in-person and individually.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Wellbeing is complex and existing evidence demonstrates a range of intervention components that may effectively support parent wellbeing. Inconsistency in defining wellbeing and diversity in outcome measurements limits our ability to determine which components of these interventions are the most effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings from this review support a multifaceted approach to supporting parents’ wellbeing during this transition, with considered intervention focus and design to support a universal population across all facets of wellbeing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"142 ","pages":"Article 104296"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting parents in the transition to parenthood through wellbeing interventions; An international scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Georgia Middleton ,&nbsp;Karen Matvienko-Sikar ,&nbsp;Annette Briley ,&nbsp;Dimity Dutch ,&nbsp;Samantha Morgillo ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Anderson ,&nbsp;Natasha Schranz ,&nbsp;Fiona Margrie ,&nbsp;Rachel Kirby ,&nbsp;Rebecca K Golley ,&nbsp;Sarah C Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2025.104296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Problem</h3><div>Many first-time parents experience poor wellbeing during the transition to parenthood.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>The transition to parenthood can be challenging, with consequences to wellbeing for many first-time parents. While parents are often well-supported to care for their children, there are minimal supports available to care for themselves. To support parents in caring for their children, they need to be supported in their own care.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>What evidence-based universal interventions supporting parent wellbeing from conception to 12 months post birth exist?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping search across four databases to identify studies measuring and reporting wellbeing outcomes of parents who participated in a prevention intervention aiming to improve wellbeing.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Seventy-four studies, reporting on 70 unique interventions, were included. Interventions were grouped into eight categories depending on their main mechanism of focus. Studies measured a range of wellbeing outcomes. Thirty-five studies provided evidence of effectiveness across all their reported outcomes. These interventions ranged across the different categories of focus, typically included mothers-only, were delivered post-birth, by a facilitator, in-person and individually.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Wellbeing is complex and existing evidence demonstrates a range of intervention components that may effectively support parent wellbeing. Inconsistency in defining wellbeing and diversity in outcome measurements limits our ability to determine which components of these interventions are the most effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings from this review support a multifaceted approach to supporting parents’ wellbeing during this transition, with considered intervention focus and design to support a universal population across all facets of wellbeing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"142 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104296\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613825000154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:许多第一次为人父母的人在过渡到为人父母的过程中幸福感不佳。背景:过渡到为人父母可能是具有挑战性的,对许多第一次为人父母的人来说,这会影响他们的健康。虽然父母在照顾子女方面经常得到很好的支持,但在照顾自己方面却很少得到支持。为了支持父母照顾他们的孩子,他们需要在自己的照顾中得到支持。研究问题:有哪些基于证据的普遍干预措施支持父母从怀孕到出生后12个月的健康?方法:在四个数据库中进行范围搜索,以确定参与旨在改善福祉的预防干预的父母的健康结果的测量和报告研究。研究结果:纳入了74项研究,报告了70种独特的干预措施。干预措施根据其主要关注机制分为八类。研究测量了一系列的健康结果。35项研究在所有报告的结果中提供了有效性的证据。这些干预措施涵盖了不同的重点类别,通常包括仅由母亲提供、产后提供、由调解人提供、亲自提供和单独提供。讨论:幸福是复杂的,现有证据表明,一系列干预成分可能有效地支持父母的幸福。定义福祉的不一致和结果测量的多样性限制了我们确定这些干预措施中哪些组成部分最有效的能力。结论:本综述的发现支持在这一过渡时期采用多方面的方法来支持父母的幸福,并考虑了干预的重点和设计,以支持普遍人群的所有方面的幸福。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting parents in the transition to parenthood through wellbeing interventions; An international scoping review

Problem

Many first-time parents experience poor wellbeing during the transition to parenthood.

Background

The transition to parenthood can be challenging, with consequences to wellbeing for many first-time parents. While parents are often well-supported to care for their children, there are minimal supports available to care for themselves. To support parents in caring for their children, they need to be supported in their own care.

Research question

What evidence-based universal interventions supporting parent wellbeing from conception to 12 months post birth exist?

Methods

A scoping search across four databases to identify studies measuring and reporting wellbeing outcomes of parents who participated in a prevention intervention aiming to improve wellbeing.

Findings

Seventy-four studies, reporting on 70 unique interventions, were included. Interventions were grouped into eight categories depending on their main mechanism of focus. Studies measured a range of wellbeing outcomes. Thirty-five studies provided evidence of effectiveness across all their reported outcomes. These interventions ranged across the different categories of focus, typically included mothers-only, were delivered post-birth, by a facilitator, in-person and individually.

Discussion

Wellbeing is complex and existing evidence demonstrates a range of intervention components that may effectively support parent wellbeing. Inconsistency in defining wellbeing and diversity in outcome measurements limits our ability to determine which components of these interventions are the most effective.

Conclusion

Findings from this review support a multifaceted approach to supporting parents’ wellbeing during this transition, with considered intervention focus and design to support a universal population across all facets of wellbeing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
The effect of “Green Future with Midwife's Hand” climate change animation on mothers' climate change awareness and behaviors: A randomized controlled study “Sometimes my body is not mine”: Maternal ambivalence, bodily limits, and relational meaning in tandem breastfeeding A longitudinal perspective on gender norms and perinatal depression in Spanish women Associations between pregnancy-related anxiety and positive health behaviors across pregnancy in a sample of low-income, vulnerable women Risk-prediction models for postpartum depression: Assessment of risk of bias using PROBAST+AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1