急诊科阿片类药物治疗头痛的相关风险

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.028
Hayward Jake MD MPH , MacLean Davis MD MPH , Rosychuk Rhonda PhD , Lonergan Kevin , Innes Grant MD MHSc
{"title":"急诊科阿片类药物治疗头痛的相关风险","authors":"Hayward Jake MD MPH ,&nbsp;MacLean Davis MD MPH ,&nbsp;Rosychuk Rhonda PhD ,&nbsp;Lonergan Kevin ,&nbsp;Innes Grant MD MHSc","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study hypothesis</h3><div>Use of opioids for treatment of headache in the emergency department (ED) is associated with an increased 1-year risk of opioid-related adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the safety and efficacy of opioid prescribing for ED patients with headache.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a multicenter observational cohort study using linked administrative data. All patients discharged from an ED in the province of Alberta, Canada with a headache diagnosis between 2010 and 2020 were included. Opioid-treated patients filled opioid prescriptions within 72 h of their ED visit, and were matched to untreated controls using propensity scores. The 1-year primary outcome was a composite of long-term prescription opioid use (LTU), opioid-related ED visit or hospitalization, or new opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Secondary outcomes included all-cause acute care utilization and 7-day ED return headache visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 323,932 eligible headache visits, 5.7 % received opioids. Opioid-treated patients were comparable to controls on all baseline characteristics. The primary outcome occurred in 8.7 % of opioid-treated patients and 5.8 % of controls (aOR 1.65 [1.49–1.82]; NNH = 29). Opioid-treated patients had higher rates of LTU (7.7 % vs. 4.8 %), all-cause ED visit (20.8 % vs. 19.0 %), all-cause hospitalization (16.7 % vs. 14.8 %), and 7-day revisit (aOR = 1.61 [1.49–1.74]; NNH = 21) but did not experience more opioid-related ED visits or hospitalizations, or new OAT. Opioid prescription potency and duration were strong predictors of harm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Opioid prescriptions are associated with ED revisits, hospitalizations and LTU in headache patients, without improved efficacy. These findings support the growing notion that opioids are not indicated for ED headache management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks associated with opioid prescriptions for headache in the emergency department\",\"authors\":\"Hayward Jake MD MPH ,&nbsp;MacLean Davis MD MPH ,&nbsp;Rosychuk Rhonda PhD ,&nbsp;Lonergan Kevin ,&nbsp;Innes Grant MD MHSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study hypothesis</h3><div>Use of opioids for treatment of headache in the emergency department (ED) is associated with an increased 1-year risk of opioid-related adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the safety and efficacy of opioid prescribing for ED patients with headache.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a multicenter observational cohort study using linked administrative data. All patients discharged from an ED in the province of Alberta, Canada with a headache diagnosis between 2010 and 2020 were included. Opioid-treated patients filled opioid prescriptions within 72 h of their ED visit, and were matched to untreated controls using propensity scores. The 1-year primary outcome was a composite of long-term prescription opioid use (LTU), opioid-related ED visit or hospitalization, or new opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Secondary outcomes included all-cause acute care utilization and 7-day ED return headache visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 323,932 eligible headache visits, 5.7 % received opioids. Opioid-treated patients were comparable to controls on all baseline characteristics. The primary outcome occurred in 8.7 % of opioid-treated patients and 5.8 % of controls (aOR 1.65 [1.49–1.82]; NNH = 29). Opioid-treated patients had higher rates of LTU (7.7 % vs. 4.8 %), all-cause ED visit (20.8 % vs. 19.0 %), all-cause hospitalization (16.7 % vs. 14.8 %), and 7-day revisit (aOR = 1.61 [1.49–1.74]; NNH = 21) but did not experience more opioid-related ED visits or hospitalizations, or new OAT. Opioid prescription potency and duration were strong predictors of harm.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Opioid prescriptions are associated with ED revisits, hospitalizations and LTU in headache patients, without improved efficacy. These findings support the growing notion that opioids are not indicated for ED headache management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 109-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725000361\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725000361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究假设:在急诊科(ED)使用阿片类药物治疗头痛与1年内阿片类药物相关不良事件的风险增加有关。目的:评价阿片类药物处方治疗急诊科头痛患者的安全性和有效性。方法:我们使用相关的行政数据进行了一项多中心观察队列研究。2010年至2020年间,加拿大阿尔伯塔省所有诊断为头痛的急诊科出院患者均被纳入研究范围。接受阿片类药物治疗的患者在ED就诊后72小时内填写了阿片类药物处方,并使用倾向评分将其与未接受治疗的对照组进行匹配。1年的主要结局是长期处方阿片类药物使用(LTU),阿片类药物相关ED就诊或住院,或新的阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)的综合结果。次要结局包括全因急性护理的使用和7天ED头痛回访。结果:在323,932例符合条件的头痛就诊中,5.7%接受了阿片类药物治疗。阿片类药物治疗的患者在所有基线特征上与对照组相当。主要结局发生在8.7%的阿片类药物治疗患者和5.8%的对照组(aOR为1.65 [1.49-1.82];nnh = 29)。阿片类药物治疗患者的LTU发生率(7.7%比4.8%)、全因急诊科就诊率(20.8%比19.0%)、全因住院率(16.7%比14.8%)和7天重访率(aOR = 1.61 [1.49-1.74];NNH = 21),但没有经历更多的阿片类药物相关的急诊科就诊或住院,也没有新的OAT。阿片类药物处方效力和持续时间是危害的有力预测因子。结论:阿片类药物处方与头痛患者ED复诊、住院和LTU相关,但没有改善疗效。这些发现支持了阿片类药物不适用于ED头痛治疗的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risks associated with opioid prescriptions for headache in the emergency department

Study hypothesis

Use of opioids for treatment of headache in the emergency department (ED) is associated with an increased 1-year risk of opioid-related adverse events.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of opioid prescribing for ED patients with headache.

Methods

We performed a multicenter observational cohort study using linked administrative data. All patients discharged from an ED in the province of Alberta, Canada with a headache diagnosis between 2010 and 2020 were included. Opioid-treated patients filled opioid prescriptions within 72 h of their ED visit, and were matched to untreated controls using propensity scores. The 1-year primary outcome was a composite of long-term prescription opioid use (LTU), opioid-related ED visit or hospitalization, or new opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Secondary outcomes included all-cause acute care utilization and 7-day ED return headache visits.

Results

Of 323,932 eligible headache visits, 5.7 % received opioids. Opioid-treated patients were comparable to controls on all baseline characteristics. The primary outcome occurred in 8.7 % of opioid-treated patients and 5.8 % of controls (aOR 1.65 [1.49–1.82]; NNH = 29). Opioid-treated patients had higher rates of LTU (7.7 % vs. 4.8 %), all-cause ED visit (20.8 % vs. 19.0 %), all-cause hospitalization (16.7 % vs. 14.8 %), and 7-day revisit (aOR = 1.61 [1.49–1.74]; NNH = 21) but did not experience more opioid-related ED visits or hospitalizations, or new OAT. Opioid prescription potency and duration were strong predictors of harm.

Conclusion

Opioid prescriptions are associated with ED revisits, hospitalizations and LTU in headache patients, without improved efficacy. These findings support the growing notion that opioids are not indicated for ED headache management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Automatic phenotyping of emergency department patients with incidental hepatic steatosis: A machine learning clustering analysis Seeing is believing: Point-of-care ultrasound for endotracheal tube confirmation Racial disparities in traumatic injuries sustained in prison: A multicenter retrospective cohort study Point-of-care lung ultrasound during atropine titration in severe organophosphate poisoning: A case report Recurrent bradycardia and hypotension after Oral Lacosamide during hospital boarding in the emergency department: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1