PIVC评估和决策的i - decide®工具的实施:讨论文件。

Gillian Ray-Barruel, Thiago Lopes Silva, Patrícia Kuerten Rocha
{"title":"PIVC评估和决策的i - decide®工具的实施:讨论文件。","authors":"Gillian Ray-Barruel, Thiago Lopes Silva, Patrícia Kuerten Rocha","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2025.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>PIVCs often cause pain, irritation, or infection. Regular and careful catheter checks can decrease complications and improve patient outcomes. Implementation of the I-DECIDED® tool led to fewer idle catheters and complications. We present ideas for implementing the tool and how to overcome some common barriers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessment and decision making should be evidence based to minimize risks and enhance patient care. Exploring implementation strategies from successful outcome studies can raise health care professionals' awareness, boost adherence to evidence-based protocols, and elevate PIVC care standards.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the implementation of the I-DECIDED® device assessment and decision tool for PIVC management in the Australian and Brazilian contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework (evidence, context, facilitation) was used to prospectively plan the implementation of the tool in adult inpatient units in Australia and to retrospectively analyze the implementation of the tool in a pediatric inpatient unit in Brazil. Similarities and differences in the implementation studies were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the tool in Australia and Brazil demonstrated that prevention and early detection of PIVC complications is achievable with standardized assessment and decision prompts. Both contexts witnessed a reduction in idle PIVCs, decreased insertion site complications, improved dressing quality, and significant improvements in documentation following implementation. Common implementation strategies included champions, education, badge cards, and posters. Enabling flexibility and context-specific education strategies was essential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardization of PIVC assessment and decision making using the I-DECIDED® tool reduced the prevalence of idle catheters and complications in Australia and Brazil. Implementation of the tool in different contexts confirms its utility and relevance for PIVC management in diverse health care settings. Promotion and adoption of the tool as a PIVC management bundle could increase patient safety and reduce health care costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"34 2","pages":"S12-S20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of the I-DECIDED<sup>®</sup> tool for PIVC assessment and decision making: discussion paper.\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Ray-Barruel, Thiago Lopes Silva, Patrícia Kuerten Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/bjon.2025.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Highlights: </strong>PIVCs often cause pain, irritation, or infection. Regular and careful catheter checks can decrease complications and improve patient outcomes. Implementation of the I-DECIDED® tool led to fewer idle catheters and complications. We present ideas for implementing the tool and how to overcome some common barriers.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessment and decision making should be evidence based to minimize risks and enhance patient care. Exploring implementation strategies from successful outcome studies can raise health care professionals' awareness, boost adherence to evidence-based protocols, and elevate PIVC care standards.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the implementation of the I-DECIDED® device assessment and decision tool for PIVC management in the Australian and Brazilian contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework (evidence, context, facilitation) was used to prospectively plan the implementation of the tool in adult inpatient units in Australia and to retrospectively analyze the implementation of the tool in a pediatric inpatient unit in Brazil. Similarities and differences in the implementation studies were explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the tool in Australia and Brazil demonstrated that prevention and early detection of PIVC complications is achievable with standardized assessment and decision prompts. Both contexts witnessed a reduction in idle PIVCs, decreased insertion site complications, improved dressing quality, and significant improvements in documentation following implementation. Common implementation strategies included champions, education, badge cards, and posters. Enabling flexibility and context-specific education strategies was essential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardization of PIVC assessment and decision making using the I-DECIDED® tool reduced the prevalence of idle catheters and complications in Australia and Brazil. Implementation of the tool in different contexts confirms its utility and relevance for PIVC management in diverse health care settings. Promotion and adoption of the tool as a PIVC management bundle could increase patient safety and reduce health care costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"S12-S20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要点:pivc常引起疼痛、刺激或感染。定期和仔细的导管检查可以减少并发症并改善患者的预后。i - decide®工具的使用减少了闲置导管和并发症。我们提出了实现该工具以及如何克服一些常见障碍的想法。外周静脉导管(PIVC)的评估和决策应以证据为基础,以尽量减少风险并加强患者护理。从成功的结果研究中探索实施策略可以提高卫生保健专业人员的意识,促进对循证协议的遵守,并提高PIVC的护理标准。目的:描述i - decide®设备评估和决策工具在澳大利亚和巴西PIVC管理中的实施情况。方法:采用卫生服务研究实施促进行动(PARIHS)框架(证据、背景、促进)前瞻性规划该工具在澳大利亚成人住院单位的实施,并回顾性分析该工具在巴西儿科住院单位的实施情况。探讨了执行研究的异同。结果:该工具在澳大利亚和巴西的实施表明,通过标准化的评估和决策提示,可以预防和早期发现PIVC并发症。这两种情况下都减少了闲置的pivc,减少了插入部位并发症,改善了敷料质量,并在实施后显著改善了文件记录。常见的实现策略包括冠军、教育、徽章卡和海报。实现灵活性和针对具体情况的教育战略至关重要。结论:在澳大利亚和巴西,使用i - decide®工具进行PIVC评估和决策的标准化降低了闲置导管和并发症的发生率。该工具在不同环境中的实施证实了其在不同卫生保健环境中对PIVC管理的实用性和相关性。推广和采用该工具作为PIVC管理包可以提高患者安全性并降低医疗保健成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of the I-DECIDED® tool for PIVC assessment and decision making: discussion paper.

Highlights: PIVCs often cause pain, irritation, or infection. Regular and careful catheter checks can decrease complications and improve patient outcomes. Implementation of the I-DECIDED® tool led to fewer idle catheters and complications. We present ideas for implementing the tool and how to overcome some common barriers.

Introduction: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) assessment and decision making should be evidence based to minimize risks and enhance patient care. Exploring implementation strategies from successful outcome studies can raise health care professionals' awareness, boost adherence to evidence-based protocols, and elevate PIVC care standards.

Aim: To describe the implementation of the I-DECIDED® device assessment and decision tool for PIVC management in the Australian and Brazilian contexts.

Methods: The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework (evidence, context, facilitation) was used to prospectively plan the implementation of the tool in adult inpatient units in Australia and to retrospectively analyze the implementation of the tool in a pediatric inpatient unit in Brazil. Similarities and differences in the implementation studies were explored.

Results: Implementation of the tool in Australia and Brazil demonstrated that prevention and early detection of PIVC complications is achievable with standardized assessment and decision prompts. Both contexts witnessed a reduction in idle PIVCs, decreased insertion site complications, improved dressing quality, and significant improvements in documentation following implementation. Common implementation strategies included champions, education, badge cards, and posters. Enabling flexibility and context-specific education strategies was essential.

Conclusion: Standardization of PIVC assessment and decision making using the I-DECIDED® tool reduced the prevalence of idle catheters and complications in Australia and Brazil. Implementation of the tool in different contexts confirms its utility and relevance for PIVC management in diverse health care settings. Promotion and adoption of the tool as a PIVC management bundle could increase patient safety and reduce health care costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing health professionals' knowledge and confidence associated with the use of parenteral nutrition. Healthcare services need to value the 'hidden work' of nursing. Diet and dementia: what nurses need to know. Moving clinical competencies from paper-based systems to a digital platform. Getting back to basics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1