{"title":"基于 CT 静脉造影的非血栓性左髂静脉压迫解剖特征对腿部静脉溃疡发展的影响。","authors":"Fandong Li, Xiaojie Lian, Mengtao Wu, Deqing Zhang, Dianjun Tang, Qiang Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04772-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore the anatomical features of left iliac vein (LIV) in non-thrombotic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and to identify the impact of these anatomical features on VLUs based on computed tomography venography (CTV).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective, single-center study of a database (2021–2023) of 431 patients with non-thrombotic chronic venous insufficiency. According to CEAP clinical (C) classifications, cases of C6 and C2 were included for analysis as case and control groups. Based on CTV data, variables that reflected the anatomical characteristics of LIV and lower lumbar degenerative changes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate impact of the anatomical features of LIV on VLUs.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 116 patients (group C6 (<i>n</i> = 33) and C2 (<i>n</i> = 83)) were included. Variables including anterior lumbar vertebral osteophytes (ALVO), minimum diameter of LIV, the number of sites of LIV stenosis, proportion of cases with percentage compression of LIV ≥ 75%, proportion of cases with triple or dual LIV stenosis showed significant difference between the two groups (all P ˂0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed ALVO [odds ratio (OR) = 3.852, <i>P</i> = 0.025], number of sites of LIV stenosis [OR = 2.654, <i>P</i> = 0.027] and minimum diameter of LIV [OR = 0.585, <i>P</i> = 0.010] were all significant for VLUs.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The factors of ALVO and number of sites of LIV stenosis were risk factors, whereas minimum diameter of LIV was a protective factor for VLUs. This provided a direction for preoperative planning of non-thrombotic LIV stenting.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"3876 - 3884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anatomical features of non-thrombotic left iliac venous compression on the development of venous leg ulcers based on CT venography\",\"authors\":\"Fandong Li, Xiaojie Lian, Mengtao Wu, Deqing Zhang, Dianjun Tang, Qiang Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-024-04772-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore the anatomical features of left iliac vein (LIV) in non-thrombotic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and to identify the impact of these anatomical features on VLUs based on computed tomography venography (CTV).</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective, single-center study of a database (2021–2023) of 431 patients with non-thrombotic chronic venous insufficiency. According to CEAP clinical (C) classifications, cases of C6 and C2 were included for analysis as case and control groups. Based on CTV data, variables that reflected the anatomical characteristics of LIV and lower lumbar degenerative changes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate impact of the anatomical features of LIV on VLUs.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 116 patients (group C6 (<i>n</i> = 33) and C2 (<i>n</i> = 83)) were included. Variables including anterior lumbar vertebral osteophytes (ALVO), minimum diameter of LIV, the number of sites of LIV stenosis, proportion of cases with percentage compression of LIV ≥ 75%, proportion of cases with triple or dual LIV stenosis showed significant difference between the two groups (all P ˂0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed ALVO [odds ratio (OR) = 3.852, <i>P</i> = 0.025], number of sites of LIV stenosis [OR = 2.654, <i>P</i> = 0.027] and minimum diameter of LIV [OR = 0.585, <i>P</i> = 0.010] were all significant for VLUs.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The factors of ALVO and number of sites of LIV stenosis were risk factors, whereas minimum diameter of LIV was a protective factor for VLUs. This provided a direction for preoperative planning of non-thrombotic LIV stenting.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"3876 - 3884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04772-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04772-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨非血栓性静脉性腿溃疡(VLUs)患者左髂静脉(LIV)的解剖特征,并基于计算机断层静脉摄影(CTV)探讨这些解剖特征对VLUs的影响。方法:这是一项针对431例非血栓性慢性静脉功能不全患者的数据库(2021-2023)的回顾性单中心研究。根据CEAP临床(C)分级,将C6和C2病例分为病例组和对照组进行分析。根据CTV数据,比较两组患者反映LIV解剖特征和下腰椎退行性改变的变量。采用多因素logistic回归分析评估LIV解剖特征对vlu的影响。结果:共纳入116例患者(C6组33例,C2组83例)。前路腰椎骨赘(ALVO)、LIV最小直径、LIV狭窄部位数、LIV压缩百分比≥75%的病例比例、三侧或双侧LIV狭窄的病例比例等变量在两组间差异均有统计学意义(P值小于0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,ALVO[比值比(OR) = 3.852, P = 0.025]、LIV狭窄部位数[OR = 2.654, P = 0.027]、LIV最小直径[OR = 0.585, P = 0.010]对VLUs均有显著性意义。结论:ALVO和LIV狭窄部位数是lvu发生的危险因素,而LIV最小直径是lvu发生的保护因素。这为非血栓性LIV支架置入术的术前规划提供了指导。
Impact of anatomical features of non-thrombotic left iliac venous compression on the development of venous leg ulcers based on CT venography
Purpose
To explore the anatomical features of left iliac vein (LIV) in non-thrombotic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and to identify the impact of these anatomical features on VLUs based on computed tomography venography (CTV).
Methods
This is a retrospective, single-center study of a database (2021–2023) of 431 patients with non-thrombotic chronic venous insufficiency. According to CEAP clinical (C) classifications, cases of C6 and C2 were included for analysis as case and control groups. Based on CTV data, variables that reflected the anatomical characteristics of LIV and lower lumbar degenerative changes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate impact of the anatomical features of LIV on VLUs.
Results
A total of 116 patients (group C6 (n = 33) and C2 (n = 83)) were included. Variables including anterior lumbar vertebral osteophytes (ALVO), minimum diameter of LIV, the number of sites of LIV stenosis, proportion of cases with percentage compression of LIV ≥ 75%, proportion of cases with triple or dual LIV stenosis showed significant difference between the two groups (all P ˂0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed ALVO [odds ratio (OR) = 3.852, P = 0.025], number of sites of LIV stenosis [OR = 2.654, P = 0.027] and minimum diameter of LIV [OR = 0.585, P = 0.010] were all significant for VLUs.
Conclusions
The factors of ALVO and number of sites of LIV stenosis were risk factors, whereas minimum diameter of LIV was a protective factor for VLUs. This provided a direction for preoperative planning of non-thrombotic LIV stenting.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits