IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1159/000543737
Tomokazu Fuji, Kosei Takagi, Yuzo Umeda, Kazuya Yasui, Motohiko Yamada, Yasuo Nagai, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
{"title":"Impact of robotic surgery on postoperative pancreatic fistula for high-risk pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.","authors":"Tomokazu Fuji, Kosei Takagi, Yuzo Umeda, Kazuya Yasui, Motohiko Yamada, Yasuo Nagai, Toshiyoshi Fujiwara","doi":"10.1159/000543737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The safety and feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in high-risk patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) have rarely been investigated, although the rate of POPF is lower than in open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). This study aimed to examine the impact of robotic surgery on POPF in high-risk patients after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 204 patients who underwent RPD between January 2018 and June 2023. Of the 204 patients, 126 with high-risk POPF were included. The outcomes of RPD and OPD were compared. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with the development of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 126 patients, 50 underwent RPD and 76 underwent OPD. The incidence of CR-POPF was significantly lower in the RPD group than in the OPD group (6.0% vs. 38.2%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified OPD as an independent risk factor associated with CR-POPF (odds ratio [OR]: 7.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11-29.4, P = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated the impact of robotic surgery on POPF in high-risk patients after PD. These results suggest that RPD may be significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CR-POPF in high-risk anastomoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)在术后胰瘘(POPF)高危患者中的安全性和可行性很少被研究,尽管POPF的发生率低于开放式胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)。本研究旨在探讨机器人手术对胰十二指肠切除术(PD)后高风险患者胰瘘的影响:这项回顾性分析纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月间接受 RPD 的 204 例患者。在这 204 名患者中,纳入了 126 名高风险 POPF 患者。比较了 RPD 和 OPD 的结果。进行了多变量分析,以确定术后发生临床相关 POPF(CR-POPF)的相关风险因素:在126名患者中,50人接受了RPD手术,76人接受了OPD手术。RPD组的CR-POPF发生率明显低于OPD组(6.0% vs. 38.2%,P < 0.001)。多变量分析发现,OPD 是与 CR-POPF 相关的独立风险因素(几率比 [OR]:7.87,95% 置信区间 [CI]:2.11-29.4,P = 0.002):本研究证明了机器人手术对PD术后高危患者POPF的影响。这些结果表明,在高风险吻合口中,RPD 可能与 CR-POPF 发生率的降低显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of robotic surgery on postoperative pancreatic fistula for high-risk pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Background: The safety and feasibility of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) in high-risk patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) have rarely been investigated, although the rate of POPF is lower than in open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD). This study aimed to examine the impact of robotic surgery on POPF in high-risk patients after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 204 patients who underwent RPD between January 2018 and June 2023. Of the 204 patients, 126 with high-risk POPF were included. The outcomes of RPD and OPD were compared. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with the development of clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) after surgery.

Results: Of the 126 patients, 50 underwent RPD and 76 underwent OPD. The incidence of CR-POPF was significantly lower in the RPD group than in the OPD group (6.0% vs. 38.2%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses identified OPD as an independent risk factor associated with CR-POPF (odds ratio [OR]: 7.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.11-29.4, P = 0.002).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the impact of robotic surgery on POPF in high-risk patients after PD. These results suggest that RPD may be significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CR-POPF in high-risk anastomoses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Impact of robotic surgery on postoperative pancreatic fistula for high-risk pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. Procalcitonin as an early predictive marker for infectious complications after hepatectomy. The Steep Ramp Test as Precursor to Assess Physical Fitness Before Esophagectomy in Cancer Patients. Longer term outcomes of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage in the management of acute Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis: A Systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Impact of Early Oral Feeding on Postoperative Outcomes after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1