利用MammaPrint对侵袭性小叶癌患者的生存结果:来自MINDACT III期试验的结果

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-25 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115222
O. Metzger Filho , F. Cardoso , C. Poncet , C. Desmedt , S. Linn , J. Wesseling , F. Hilbers , S. Delaloge , J.-Y. Pierga , E. Brain , S. Vrijaldenhoven , P.A. Neijenhuis , E.J.Th Rutgers , M. Piccart , L.J. van ’t Veer , G. Viale
{"title":"利用MammaPrint对侵袭性小叶癌患者的生存结果:来自MINDACT III期试验的结果","authors":"O. Metzger Filho ,&nbsp;F. Cardoso ,&nbsp;C. Poncet ,&nbsp;C. Desmedt ,&nbsp;S. Linn ,&nbsp;J. Wesseling ,&nbsp;F. Hilbers ,&nbsp;S. Delaloge ,&nbsp;J.-Y. Pierga ,&nbsp;E. Brain ,&nbsp;S. Vrijaldenhoven ,&nbsp;P.A. Neijenhuis ,&nbsp;E.J.Th Rutgers ,&nbsp;M. Piccart ,&nbsp;L.J. van ’t Veer ,&nbsp;G. Viale","doi":"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evaluation of the prognostic performance and clinical utility of the MammaPrint 70-gene signature in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) for whom such analyses in a randomized trial is awaited.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Exploratory subgroup analysis of MINDACT trial patients with centrally assessed histology (n = 5929) with invasive breast cancer of no-special-type (NST), or pure ILC. In the trial patients were categorized based on the 70-gene signature for genomic risk and modified Adjuvant!Online for clinical risk. Survival outcomes at 8.7 years median follow-up by 70-gene signature were compared between NST and ILC for Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5313 patients were ILC (n = 487) or NST (n = 4826). ILC was further classified into classic ILC (n = 255) or ILC variants (n = 232). The 70-gene signature classified 16.2 % of ILC and 39.1 % of NST as genomic high-risk (gH). Survival outcomes for ILC vs. NST revealed similar estimates according to genomic risk overall and across subsets. The 70-gene signature classified 10.2 % of classic ILC and 22.8 % of ILC variants as gH. 5-yr DFS estimates for ILC variants 88.4 % (95 %CI: 83.1–92.1) was inferior to classic ILC 93.0 % (95 %CI: 88.7–95.7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sixteen percent of ILC were classified high genomic risk by the 70-gene signature, with unfavorable survival outcomes. Survival estimates were similar for patients with ILC and NST classified as either low- or high-genomic risk, suggesting that the 70-gene signature also has prognostic value in ILC and may be a clinically useful tool for adjuvant treatment decision-making in ILC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11980,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 115222"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival outcomes for patients with invasive lobular cancer by MammaPrint: Results from the MINDACT phase III trial\",\"authors\":\"O. Metzger Filho ,&nbsp;F. Cardoso ,&nbsp;C. Poncet ,&nbsp;C. Desmedt ,&nbsp;S. Linn ,&nbsp;J. Wesseling ,&nbsp;F. Hilbers ,&nbsp;S. Delaloge ,&nbsp;J.-Y. Pierga ,&nbsp;E. Brain ,&nbsp;S. Vrijaldenhoven ,&nbsp;P.A. Neijenhuis ,&nbsp;E.J.Th Rutgers ,&nbsp;M. Piccart ,&nbsp;L.J. van ’t Veer ,&nbsp;G. Viale\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Evaluation of the prognostic performance and clinical utility of the MammaPrint 70-gene signature in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) for whom such analyses in a randomized trial is awaited.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Exploratory subgroup analysis of MINDACT trial patients with centrally assessed histology (n = 5929) with invasive breast cancer of no-special-type (NST), or pure ILC. In the trial patients were categorized based on the 70-gene signature for genomic risk and modified Adjuvant!Online for clinical risk. Survival outcomes at 8.7 years median follow-up by 70-gene signature were compared between NST and ILC for Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5313 patients were ILC (n = 487) or NST (n = 4826). ILC was further classified into classic ILC (n = 255) or ILC variants (n = 232). The 70-gene signature classified 16.2 % of ILC and 39.1 % of NST as genomic high-risk (gH). Survival outcomes for ILC vs. NST revealed similar estimates according to genomic risk overall and across subsets. The 70-gene signature classified 10.2 % of classic ILC and 22.8 % of ILC variants as gH. 5-yr DFS estimates for ILC variants 88.4 % (95 %CI: 83.1–92.1) was inferior to classic ILC 93.0 % (95 %CI: 88.7–95.7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Sixteen percent of ILC were classified high genomic risk by the 70-gene signature, with unfavorable survival outcomes. Survival estimates were similar for patients with ILC and NST classified as either low- or high-genomic risk, suggesting that the 70-gene signature also has prognostic value in ILC and may be a clinically useful tool for adjuvant treatment decision-making in ILC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"217 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925000036\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804925000036","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估早期侵袭性小叶癌(ILC)中MammaPrint 70基因标记的预后性能和临床应用,这类分析有待在随机试验中进行。患者和方法:对中心评估组织学( = 5929)无特殊类型(NST)或纯ILC浸润性乳腺癌的MINDACT试验患者进行探索性亚组分析。在试验中,患者根据基因组风险和修饰佐剂的70个基因标记进行分类!在线查看临床风险。通过70个基因标记的8.7年中位随访,比较了NST和ILC之间的无远处转移生存(DMFS)、无疾病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)的生存结果。结果:5313例患者为ILC (n = 487)或NST (n = 4826)。ILC进一步分为经典ILC (n = 255)和ILC变体(n = 232)。70个基因标记将16.2% %的ILC和39.1% %的NST归为基因组高危(gH)。根据总体和跨亚群的基因组风险,ILC与NST的生存结果显示相似的估计。70个基因标记将10. %的经典ILC和22.8% %的ILC变体分类为gH。ILC变异的5年DFS估计为88.4 %(95 %CI: 83.1-92.1)低于经典ILC的93.0 %(95 %CI: 88.7-95.7)。结论:16%的ILC被70个基因标记分类为高基因组风险,具有不利的生存结果。ILC和NST患者的生存估计相似,分为低基因组风险和高基因组风险,这表明70个基因标记在ILC中也具有预后价值,可能是ILC辅助治疗决策的临床有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Survival outcomes for patients with invasive lobular cancer by MammaPrint: Results from the MINDACT phase III trial

Background

Evaluation of the prognostic performance and clinical utility of the MammaPrint 70-gene signature in early-stage invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) for whom such analyses in a randomized trial is awaited.

Patients and methods

Exploratory subgroup analysis of MINDACT trial patients with centrally assessed histology (n = 5929) with invasive breast cancer of no-special-type (NST), or pure ILC. In the trial patients were categorized based on the 70-gene signature for genomic risk and modified Adjuvant!Online for clinical risk. Survival outcomes at 8.7 years median follow-up by 70-gene signature were compared between NST and ILC for Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS), Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS).

Results

5313 patients were ILC (n = 487) or NST (n = 4826). ILC was further classified into classic ILC (n = 255) or ILC variants (n = 232). The 70-gene signature classified 16.2 % of ILC and 39.1 % of NST as genomic high-risk (gH). Survival outcomes for ILC vs. NST revealed similar estimates according to genomic risk overall and across subsets. The 70-gene signature classified 10.2 % of classic ILC and 22.8 % of ILC variants as gH. 5-yr DFS estimates for ILC variants 88.4 % (95 %CI: 83.1–92.1) was inferior to classic ILC 93.0 % (95 %CI: 88.7–95.7).

Conclusions

Sixteen percent of ILC were classified high genomic risk by the 70-gene signature, with unfavorable survival outcomes. Survival estimates were similar for patients with ILC and NST classified as either low- or high-genomic risk, suggesting that the 70-gene signature also has prognostic value in ILC and may be a clinically useful tool for adjuvant treatment decision-making in ILC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer
European Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
953
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer (EJC) serves as a comprehensive platform integrating preclinical, digital, translational, and clinical research across the spectrum of cancer. From epidemiology, carcinogenesis, and biology to groundbreaking innovations in cancer treatment and patient care, the journal covers a wide array of topics. We publish original research, reviews, previews, editorial comments, and correspondence, fostering dialogue and advancement in the fight against cancer. Join us in our mission to drive progress and improve outcomes in cancer research and patient care.
期刊最新文献
A pooled analysis of phase 2 clinical trials in advanced chordoma Chemotherapy duration and patient-reported outcomes in HER2-positive early breast cancer: Results from the TRAIN-3 study No prognostic role for FIGO grading in mismatch repair deficient endometrial carcinoma Successful rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor after immune-related myocarditis, myositis, myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome (IM3OS) HPV awareness gaps and the significant economic burden of oropharyngeal cancer in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1