Jian-Zhou Tian, Li Zhang, Fu-Yong Lin, Ren-Jiao He, Wen-Rong Tian, Liu Yan, Guo-Xin Huang, Jin-Wei Ai, Bin Pei, De-Sheng Li
{"title":"PD-1抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期食管癌的疗效和安全性:一项网络荟萃分析","authors":"Jian-Zhou Tian, Li Zhang, Fu-Yong Lin, Ren-Jiao He, Wen-Rong Tian, Liu Yan, Guo-Xin Huang, Jin-Wei Ai, Bin Pei, De-Sheng Li","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs involving 4,363 participants were included. The results of the direct comparison showed that, compared with chemotherapy alone, PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.63-0.74), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.58-0.67), objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.28-1.57), but were associated with a slight increase in treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.03-1.14). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that toripalimab, sintilimab or camrelizumab, and nivolumab combined with chemotherapy were the best in OS, PFS, and ORR, respectively, with camrelizumab showing the lowest incidence of AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy provide superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone, albeit with a moderate increase in AEs. However, further verification through multi-center, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration https//wwwcrdyorkacuk/prospero/display_recordphp?id=crd42024627485: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1515263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jian-Zhou Tian, Li Zhang, Fu-Yong Lin, Ren-Jiao He, Wen-Rong Tian, Liu Yan, Guo-Xin Huang, Jin-Wei Ai, Bin Pei, De-Sheng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs involving 4,363 participants were included. The results of the direct comparison showed that, compared with chemotherapy alone, PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.63-0.74), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.58-0.67), objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.28-1.57), but were associated with a slight increase in treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.03-1.14). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that toripalimab, sintilimab or camrelizumab, and nivolumab combined with chemotherapy were the best in OS, PFS, and ORR, respectively, with camrelizumab showing the lowest incidence of AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy provide superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone, albeit with a moderate increase in AEs. However, further verification through multi-center, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration https//wwwcrdyorkacuk/prospero/display_recordphp?id=crd42024627485: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1515263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1515263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:系统评价程序性死亡1 (PD-1)抑制剂联合化疗治疗晚期食管癌(EC)的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus和Cochrane Library,确定相关的随机对照试验(rct)。结果:纳入7项随机对照试验,共4363名受试者。直接比较的结果表明,与单独化疗相比,PD-1抑制剂结合化疗显著提高总生存期(OS) (HR = 0.69,95% ci = 0.63 - -0.74),无进展生存(PFS) (HR = 0.63,95% ci = 0.58 - -0.67),客观缓解率(ORR) (RR = 1.41,95% ci = 1.28 - -1.57),但与治疗相关的不良事件略有增加(AEs) (RR = 1.08,95% ci = 1.03 - -1.14)。网络荟萃分析结果显示,托利帕单抗、辛替单抗或卡莫来珠单抗和纳武单抗联合化疗分别在OS、PFS和ORR方面表现最佳,其中卡莫来珠单抗ae发生率最低。结论:这些结果表明,PD-1抑制剂联合化疗比单独化疗有更好的临床疗效,尽管ae会适度增加。然而,需要通过多中心、高质量、更大样本量的随机对照试验进一步验证这些发现。系统评论注册https// www.crdyorkacuk /prospero/display_recordphp?id = crd42024627485:
The efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis.
Objective: This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer (EC).
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify related randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Results: Seven RCTs involving 4,363 participants were included. The results of the direct comparison showed that, compared with chemotherapy alone, PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.63-0.74), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.58-0.67), objective response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.28-1.57), but were associated with a slight increase in treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 1.03-1.14). The results of the network meta-analysis showed that toripalimab, sintilimab or camrelizumab, and nivolumab combined with chemotherapy were the best in OS, PFS, and ORR, respectively, with camrelizumab showing the lowest incidence of AEs.
Conclusion: These results suggest that PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy provide superior clinical benefits over chemotherapy alone, albeit with a moderate increase in AEs. However, further verification through multi-center, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes is needed to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world