数字探测器PET/CT增加了阿尔茨海默病中淀粉样蛋白的Centiloid测量:相机的头对头比较。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1177/13872877241313063
Ashley Gillman, Pierrick Bourgeat, Timothy Cox, Victor L Villemagne, Jurgen Fripp, Kun Huang, Rob Williams, Rosita Shishegar, Graeme O'Keefe, Shenpeng Li, Natasha Krishnadas, Azadeh Feizpour, Svetlana Bozinovski, Christopher C Rowe, Vincent Doré
{"title":"数字探测器PET/CT增加了阿尔茨海默病中淀粉样蛋白的Centiloid测量:相机的头对头比较。","authors":"Ashley Gillman, Pierrick Bourgeat, Timothy Cox, Victor L Villemagne, Jurgen Fripp, Kun Huang, Rob Williams, Rosita Shishegar, Graeme O'Keefe, Shenpeng Li, Natasha Krishnadas, Azadeh Feizpour, Svetlana Bozinovski, Christopher C Rowe, Vincent Doré","doi":"10.1177/13872877241313063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease has led to increased interest in precisely quantifying amyloid-β (Aβ) burden for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and further clinical research. Recent positron emission tomography (PET) hardware innovations including digital detectors have led to superior resolution and sensitivity, improving quantitative accuracy. However, the effect of PET scanner on Centiloid remains relatively unexplored and is assumed to be minimized by harmonizing PET resolutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the differences in Centiloid between scanners in a paired cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>36 participants from the Australian Imaging, Biomarker and Lifestyle study (AIBL) cohort were scanned within a year on two scanners. Each participant underwent <sup>18</sup>F-NAV4694 imaging on two of the three scanners investigated, the Siemens Vision, the Siemens mCT and the Philips Gemini. We compared Aβ Centiloid quantification between scanners and assessed the effectiveness of post-reconstruction PET resolution harmonization. We further compared the scanner differences in target sub-regions and with different reference regions to assess spatial variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Centiloid from the Vision camera was found to be significantly higher compared to the Gemini and mCT; the difference was greater at high-Centiloid levels. Post-reconstruction resolution harmonization only accounted for and corrected ∼20% of the Centiloid (CL) difference between scanners. We further demonstrated that residual differences have effects that vary spatially between different subregions of the Centiloid mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have demonstrated that the type of PET scanner that a participant is scanned on affects Centiloid quantification, even when scanner resolution is harmonized. We conclude by highlighting the need for further investigation into harmonization techniques that consider scanner differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"1257-1268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital detector PET/CT increases Centiloid measures of amyloid in Alzheimer's disease: A head-to-head comparison of cameras.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Gillman, Pierrick Bourgeat, Timothy Cox, Victor L Villemagne, Jurgen Fripp, Kun Huang, Rob Williams, Rosita Shishegar, Graeme O'Keefe, Shenpeng Li, Natasha Krishnadas, Azadeh Feizpour, Svetlana Bozinovski, Christopher C Rowe, Vincent Doré\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241313063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease has led to increased interest in precisely quantifying amyloid-β (Aβ) burden for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and further clinical research. Recent positron emission tomography (PET) hardware innovations including digital detectors have led to superior resolution and sensitivity, improving quantitative accuracy. However, the effect of PET scanner on Centiloid remains relatively unexplored and is assumed to be minimized by harmonizing PET resolutions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify the differences in Centiloid between scanners in a paired cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>36 participants from the Australian Imaging, Biomarker and Lifestyle study (AIBL) cohort were scanned within a year on two scanners. Each participant underwent <sup>18</sup>F-NAV4694 imaging on two of the three scanners investigated, the Siemens Vision, the Siemens mCT and the Philips Gemini. We compared Aβ Centiloid quantification between scanners and assessed the effectiveness of post-reconstruction PET resolution harmonization. We further compared the scanner differences in target sub-regions and with different reference regions to assess spatial variability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Centiloid from the Vision camera was found to be significantly higher compared to the Gemini and mCT; the difference was greater at high-Centiloid levels. Post-reconstruction resolution harmonization only accounted for and corrected ∼20% of the Centiloid (CL) difference between scanners. We further demonstrated that residual differences have effects that vary spatially between different subregions of the Centiloid mask.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have demonstrated that the type of PET scanner that a participant is scanned on affects Centiloid quantification, even when scanner resolution is harmonized. We conclude by highlighting the need for further investigation into harmonization techniques that consider scanner differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1257-1268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241313063\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241313063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿尔茨海默病治疗方法的引入增加了对精确量化淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ)负担的兴趣,以用于诊断、治疗监测和进一步的临床研究。最近的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)硬件创新,包括数字探测器,带来了卓越的分辨率和灵敏度,提高了定量准确性。然而,PET扫描仪对Centiloid的影响仍然相对未被探索,并被认为是通过协调PET分辨率最小化。目的:量化配对队列中扫描仪之间Centiloid的差异。方法:来自澳大利亚影像、生物标志物和生活方式研究(AIBL)队列的36名参与者在一年内使用两台扫描仪进行扫描。每个参与者都在西门子视觉、西门子mCT和飞利浦双子座三种扫描仪中的两种上进行了18F-NAV4694成像。我们比较了不同扫描仪之间的Aβ Centiloid定量,并评估了重建后PET分辨率协调的有效性。我们进一步比较了目标子区域和不同参考区域的扫描仪差异,以评估空间变异性。结果:与Gemini和mCT相比,Vision相机拍摄的Centiloid明显更高;在高centiloid水平时差异更大。重建后的分辨率协调仅占并校正了扫描仪之间厘体(CL)差异的20%。我们进一步证明,残余差异在不同的子区域之间具有不同的空间影响。结论:我们已经证明,参与者被扫描的PET扫描仪类型影响Centiloid定量,即使扫描仪分辨率是统一的。最后,我们强调需要进一步研究考虑扫描仪差异的协调技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital detector PET/CT increases Centiloid measures of amyloid in Alzheimer's disease: A head-to-head comparison of cameras.

Background: The introduction of therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease has led to increased interest in precisely quantifying amyloid-β (Aβ) burden for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and further clinical research. Recent positron emission tomography (PET) hardware innovations including digital detectors have led to superior resolution and sensitivity, improving quantitative accuracy. However, the effect of PET scanner on Centiloid remains relatively unexplored and is assumed to be minimized by harmonizing PET resolutions.

Objective: To quantify the differences in Centiloid between scanners in a paired cohort.

Methods: 36 participants from the Australian Imaging, Biomarker and Lifestyle study (AIBL) cohort were scanned within a year on two scanners. Each participant underwent 18F-NAV4694 imaging on two of the three scanners investigated, the Siemens Vision, the Siemens mCT and the Philips Gemini. We compared Aβ Centiloid quantification between scanners and assessed the effectiveness of post-reconstruction PET resolution harmonization. We further compared the scanner differences in target sub-regions and with different reference regions to assess spatial variability.

Results: Centiloid from the Vision camera was found to be significantly higher compared to the Gemini and mCT; the difference was greater at high-Centiloid levels. Post-reconstruction resolution harmonization only accounted for and corrected ∼20% of the Centiloid (CL) difference between scanners. We further demonstrated that residual differences have effects that vary spatially between different subregions of the Centiloid mask.

Conclusions: We have demonstrated that the type of PET scanner that a participant is scanned on affects Centiloid quantification, even when scanner resolution is harmonized. We conclude by highlighting the need for further investigation into harmonization techniques that consider scanner differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Evidence from European ancestry genome-wide association studies and a case-control study suggests several selenoproteins are linked to a decreased risk of Alzheimer's disease. Associations of television viewing, computer use, and Alzheimer's disease among United States adults: A cross-sectional study of NHANES. BRAIN-Diabetes: Acceptability of an adapted FINGER multidomain intervention among adults living with type 2 diabetes in rural border regions across the island of Ireland. Bypassing the bottleneck: Gamma-glutamylcysteine supplementation for brain glutathione enrichment in Alzheimer's disease. Development and validation of an amyloid PET dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1