内化护理污名量表(ICSS)的开发与验证:测量针对德国老年人非正式护理的护理污名。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY Gerontologist Pub Date : 2025-03-25 DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf012
Larissa Zwar, Hans-Helmut König, Emily Delfin, André Hajek
{"title":"内化护理污名量表(ICSS)的开发与验证:测量针对德国老年人非正式护理的护理污名。","authors":"Larissa Zwar, Hans-Helmut König, Emily Delfin, André Hajek","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In this study, we developed and validated the Internalized Caregiver Stigma Scale (ICSS) to measure internalized stigma targeting informal care for older adults (≥60 years) in Germany.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The ICSS scale was developed in the Attitudes Towards Informal Caregivers project based on stigma theories and (cognitive) pretesting with informal caregivers. Informal long-term caregivers (aged ≥40 years; n = 433) of older relatives (aged ≥60 years) were quota-sampled from the online panel GapFish in December 2023 (twice as many female and middle-aged [aged 40-64 years] caregivers than male and younger [18-39 years] or older adults [65+ years] were included in the sample). Caregiver identification and the Social Impact Scale were used for validation of the newly developed measure. Factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A correlated 2-factor model with excellent goodness-of-fit criteria and good to excellent internal consistency of the factors and the total scale was confirmed for the ICSS. The negative ICSS subscale correlated highly, and the positive ICSS subscale correlated weakly, with the care-specific Social Impact Scale. Both ICSS subscales were weakly correlated with caregiver identification. Both aspects of self-stigma showed significant associations with sociodemographic and care-specific factors in the regression models.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The ICSS is the first scale measuring internalized stigma targeting informal care for older adults directly and shows excellent psychometric criteria. It provides the necessary tool for a new approach to analyze the complex psychosocial mechanisms in this highly relevant care context.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the Internalized Care Stigma Scale (ICSS): Measuring Care Stigma Aimed at Informal Care for Older Adults in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Zwar, Hans-Helmut König, Emily Delfin, André Hajek\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnaf012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>In this study, we developed and validated the Internalized Caregiver Stigma Scale (ICSS) to measure internalized stigma targeting informal care for older adults (≥60 years) in Germany.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The ICSS scale was developed in the Attitudes Towards Informal Caregivers project based on stigma theories and (cognitive) pretesting with informal caregivers. Informal long-term caregivers (aged ≥40 years; n = 433) of older relatives (aged ≥60 years) were quota-sampled from the online panel GapFish in December 2023 (twice as many female and middle-aged [aged 40-64 years] caregivers than male and younger [18-39 years] or older adults [65+ years] were included in the sample). Caregiver identification and the Social Impact Scale were used for validation of the newly developed measure. Factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity were tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A correlated 2-factor model with excellent goodness-of-fit criteria and good to excellent internal consistency of the factors and the total scale was confirmed for the ICSS. The negative ICSS subscale correlated highly, and the positive ICSS subscale correlated weakly, with the care-specific Social Impact Scale. Both ICSS subscales were weakly correlated with caregiver identification. Both aspects of self-stigma showed significant associations with sociodemographic and care-specific factors in the regression models.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The ICSS is the first scale measuring internalized stigma targeting informal care for older adults directly and shows excellent psychometric criteria. It provides the necessary tool for a new approach to analyze the complex psychosocial mechanisms in this highly relevant care context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在本研究中,我们开发并验证了内化照顾者耻辱感量表(ICSS),以测量针对德国老年人(≥60岁)的非正式护理的内化耻辱感。研究设计与方法:ICSS量表是在污名理论和非正式照顾者(认知)前测的基础上,在非正式照顾者态度(ATTIC)项目中开发的。非正式长期照护者(年龄≥40岁;n=433)的老年亲属(年龄≥60岁)于2023年12月从在线面板GapFish中配额抽样(样本中包括的女性和中年(40-64岁)照顾者的数量是男性和年轻(18-39岁)或老年人(65岁以上)的两倍)。使用照顾者识别和社会影响量表对新开发的测量方法进行验证。测试了因子结构、信度和并发效度。结果:证实了ICSS具有良好的拟合优度标准,各因子与总量表具有良好至良好的内部一致性的双因素相关模型。ICSS负向分量表与护理特异性社会影响量表呈高度相关,而ICSS正向分量表与护理特异性社会影响量表呈弱相关。两个ICSS分量表都与照顾者识别呈弱相关。在回归模型中,自我耻感的两个方面都与社会人口学和护理特定因素有显著的关联。讨论与意义:ICSS是第一个直接测量针对老年人非正式护理的内化耻辱的量表,并显示出优秀的心理测量标准。它提供了一种新的方法来分析复杂的社会心理机制在这个高度相关的护理背景下的必要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of the Internalized Care Stigma Scale (ICSS): Measuring Care Stigma Aimed at Informal Care for Older Adults in Germany.

Background and objectives: In this study, we developed and validated the Internalized Caregiver Stigma Scale (ICSS) to measure internalized stigma targeting informal care for older adults (≥60 years) in Germany.

Research design and methods: The ICSS scale was developed in the Attitudes Towards Informal Caregivers project based on stigma theories and (cognitive) pretesting with informal caregivers. Informal long-term caregivers (aged ≥40 years; n = 433) of older relatives (aged ≥60 years) were quota-sampled from the online panel GapFish in December 2023 (twice as many female and middle-aged [aged 40-64 years] caregivers than male and younger [18-39 years] or older adults [65+ years] were included in the sample). Caregiver identification and the Social Impact Scale were used for validation of the newly developed measure. Factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity were tested.

Results: A correlated 2-factor model with excellent goodness-of-fit criteria and good to excellent internal consistency of the factors and the total scale was confirmed for the ICSS. The negative ICSS subscale correlated highly, and the positive ICSS subscale correlated weakly, with the care-specific Social Impact Scale. Both ICSS subscales were weakly correlated with caregiver identification. Both aspects of self-stigma showed significant associations with sociodemographic and care-specific factors in the regression models.

Discussion and implications: The ICSS is the first scale measuring internalized stigma targeting informal care for older adults directly and shows excellent psychometric criteria. It provides the necessary tool for a new approach to analyze the complex psychosocial mechanisms in this highly relevant care context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
期刊最新文献
Long-term trends in HIV-related stigma among older adults with and without HIV: a cohort study from Mbarara, Uganda. Unravelling Cognitive Frailty: Perceptions, Misconceptions, and the Path to Prevention. Caregiver Speaks: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Storytelling Intervention for Hospice Family Caregivers of Persons with Dementia. Assessing the feasibility of linking Section G and Section GG measures of function in skilled nursing facilities. "Just Put the Heart into It and Go with the Flow": Family Preparedness for a Good End-of-Life for People with Dementia from Perspectives of Active Family Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Vietnam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1