Andrea L Axtell, Clara Angeles, Daniel P McCarthy, James D Maloney, Glen E Leverson, Malcolm M DeCamp
{"title":"Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy - Analysis of the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database.","authors":"Andrea L Axtell, Clara Angeles, Daniel P McCarthy, James D Maloney, Glen E Leverson, Malcolm M DeCamp","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to identify the prevalence of anastomotic leak, stratified by operative approach and disease etiology, as well as risk factors for leak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis using the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database was conducted on patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction between 2009-2021. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not develop an anastomotic leak. Multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models identified risk factors for leak.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18,419 patients, 3,416 (19%) developed an anastomotic leak. Patients who leaked had more comorbidities including obesity and diabetes. There was no difference in leak based on disease etiology (p=0.435.) Patients with anastomotic leak had increased 30-day mortality (7% vs 4%, p<0.001), reoperation (58% vs 10%, p<0.001), and longer lengths of stay (18 vs 10 days, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, obesity (OR 1.27[1.16-1.38], p<0.001), diabetes (OR 1.14[1.04-1.25], p=0.006), and smoking (OR 1.26[1.15-1.37], p<0.001) were independently predictive of anastomotic leak. Compared to an open 2-field, a transhiatal (OR 1.35[1.17-1.55], p<0.001) or 3-field esophagectomy (OR 1.46[1.25-1.70], p<0.001) was more likely to leak. A robotic approach was associated with an increased risk of leak (OR 1.28[1.03-1.08], p<0.001), however lost significance in a modern subgroup from 2018-2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obesity, diabetes, smoking, pulmonary hypertension, and a cervical anastomosis are risk factors for anastomotic leak regardless of disease etiology. These important clinical risk factors identify an opportunity for modifiable risk reduction with aggressive medical optimization perioperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.12.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy - Analysis of the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database.
Background: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to identify the prevalence of anastomotic leak, stratified by operative approach and disease etiology, as well as risk factors for leak.
Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis using the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database was conducted on patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction between 2009-2021. Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not develop an anastomotic leak. Multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models identified risk factors for leak.
Results: Of 18,419 patients, 3,416 (19%) developed an anastomotic leak. Patients who leaked had more comorbidities including obesity and diabetes. There was no difference in leak based on disease etiology (p=0.435.) Patients with anastomotic leak had increased 30-day mortality (7% vs 4%, p<0.001), reoperation (58% vs 10%, p<0.001), and longer lengths of stay (18 vs 10 days, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis, obesity (OR 1.27[1.16-1.38], p<0.001), diabetes (OR 1.14[1.04-1.25], p=0.006), and smoking (OR 1.26[1.15-1.37], p<0.001) were independently predictive of anastomotic leak. Compared to an open 2-field, a transhiatal (OR 1.35[1.17-1.55], p<0.001) or 3-field esophagectomy (OR 1.46[1.25-1.70], p<0.001) was more likely to leak. A robotic approach was associated with an increased risk of leak (OR 1.28[1.03-1.08], p<0.001), however lost significance in a modern subgroup from 2018-2021.
Conclusions: Obesity, diabetes, smoking, pulmonary hypertension, and a cervical anastomosis are risk factors for anastomotic leak regardless of disease etiology. These important clinical risk factors identify an opportunity for modifiable risk reduction with aggressive medical optimization perioperatively.
期刊介绍:
The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features:
• Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques
• New Technology articles
• Case reports
• "How-to-do-it" features
• Reviews of current literature
• Supplements on symposia
• Commentary pieces and correspondence
• CME
• Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery.
An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.