经口内窥镜下肌切开术治疗复杂贲门失弛缓症和POEM难度评分:最新进展。

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70055
Carmen Ching Hui Yee, Michael Youssef, Matthew Woo, Robert Bechara
{"title":"经口内窥镜下肌切开术治疗复杂贲门失弛缓症和POEM难度评分:最新进展。","authors":"Carmen Ching Hui Yee,&nbsp;Michael Youssef,&nbsp;Matthew Woo,&nbsp;Robert Bechara","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We present an update on the (peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) difficulty score [PDS] by introducing a novel knife with waterjet functionality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent POEM between May 2018 and July 2023 at the Kingston Health Sciences Center. Demographic and procedural variables were compared using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred thirty-nine consecutive POEMs were included in the study. Seventy-four (56.7% male; aged 56.7 ± 16.5 years) complex achalasia (CA) and 65 (55.4% female; aged 47.3 ± 20.2 years) non-CA POEM procedures were performed. PDS correlates moderately with procedural efficiency with a correlation coefficient of 0.595 (Spearman's <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The mean efficiency for non-CA was 3.3 ± 1.2 min/cm compared to CA as follows: type III 3.3 ± 1.3 min/cm; prior myotomy 5.3 ± 2.3 min/cm; ≧4 prior procedures 4.0 ± 1.7 min/cm; sigmoid type 5.2 ± 2.4 min/cm. The median PDS for non-CA was 1 (1–5). In comparison, the median PDS for CA is as follows: type III 3 (2–4); prior myotomy 4 (3–5); ≧4 prior procedures 3 (1.25–4); sigmoid type 3 (2–4). PDS excluding the presence of spastic contractions correlated better with procedural velocity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.645 (Spearman's <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>PDS continues to moderately correlate with procedural efficiency using the novel knife. The presence of spastic contractions correlated poorly with procedural efficiency. Thus, it may be omitted in further studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peroral endoscopic myotomy for complex achalasia and the POEM difficulty score: An update\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Ching Hui Yee,&nbsp;Michael Youssef,&nbsp;Matthew Woo,&nbsp;Robert Bechara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>We present an update on the (peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) difficulty score [PDS] by introducing a novel knife with waterjet functionality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent POEM between May 2018 and July 2023 at the Kingston Health Sciences Center. Demographic and procedural variables were compared using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>One hundred thirty-nine consecutive POEMs were included in the study. Seventy-four (56.7% male; aged 56.7 ± 16.5 years) complex achalasia (CA) and 65 (55.4% female; aged 47.3 ± 20.2 years) non-CA POEM procedures were performed. PDS correlates moderately with procedural efficiency with a correlation coefficient of 0.595 (Spearman's <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The mean efficiency for non-CA was 3.3 ± 1.2 min/cm compared to CA as follows: type III 3.3 ± 1.3 min/cm; prior myotomy 5.3 ± 2.3 min/cm; ≧4 prior procedures 4.0 ± 1.7 min/cm; sigmoid type 5.2 ± 2.4 min/cm. The median PDS for non-CA was 1 (1–5). In comparison, the median PDS for CA is as follows: type III 3 (2–4); prior myotomy 4 (3–5); ≧4 prior procedures 3 (1.25–4); sigmoid type 3 (2–4). PDS excluding the presence of spastic contractions correlated better with procedural velocity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.645 (Spearman's <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>PDS continues to moderately correlate with procedural efficiency using the novel knife. The presence of spastic contractions correlated poorly with procedural efficiency. Thus, it may be omitted in further studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们通过引入一种具有水射流功能的新型刀,更新了经口内窥镜肌切开术(POEM)难度评分[PDS]。方法:回顾性分析2018年5月至2023年7月在金斯顿健康科学中心接受POEM治疗的患者。人口统计和程序变量采用描述性和推断性统计进行比较。结果:139篇连续的诗歌被纳入研究。74名(男性56.7%;年龄(56.7±16.5)岁)复杂贲门失弛缓症(CA) 65例(女性55.4%;年龄(47.3±20.2岁)行非ca POEM手术。PDS与手术效率适度相关,相关系数为0.595 (Spearman’s p)。结论:PDS继续与使用新型刀具的手术效率适度相关。痉挛性收缩的存在与手术效率相关性较差。因此,在进一步的研究中可以省略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Peroral endoscopic myotomy for complex achalasia and the POEM difficulty score: An update

Objectives

We present an update on the (peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) difficulty score [PDS] by introducing a novel knife with waterjet functionality.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent POEM between May 2018 and July 2023 at the Kingston Health Sciences Center. Demographic and procedural variables were compared using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

One hundred thirty-nine consecutive POEMs were included in the study. Seventy-four (56.7% male; aged 56.7 ± 16.5 years) complex achalasia (CA) and 65 (55.4% female; aged 47.3 ± 20.2 years) non-CA POEM procedures were performed. PDS correlates moderately with procedural efficiency with a correlation coefficient of 0.595 (Spearman's p < 0.001). The mean efficiency for non-CA was 3.3 ± 1.2 min/cm compared to CA as follows: type III 3.3 ± 1.3 min/cm; prior myotomy 5.3 ± 2.3 min/cm; ≧4 prior procedures 4.0 ± 1.7 min/cm; sigmoid type 5.2 ± 2.4 min/cm. The median PDS for non-CA was 1 (1–5). In comparison, the median PDS for CA is as follows: type III 3 (2–4); prior myotomy 4 (3–5); ≧4 prior procedures 3 (1.25–4); sigmoid type 3 (2–4). PDS excluding the presence of spastic contractions correlated better with procedural velocity, with a correlation coefficient of 0.645 (Spearman's p < 0.001).

Conclusions

PDS continues to moderately correlate with procedural efficiency using the novel knife. The presence of spastic contractions correlated poorly with procedural efficiency. Thus, it may be omitted in further studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Report of a Rapidly Progressive Indolent T-Cell Lymphoma of the Gastrointestinal Tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1