在两项随机试验参与者的随访研究中,将管理数据集用于结果评估的时间和成本。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Medical Research Methodology Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12874-025-02458-9
Mohammad Shahbaz, Jane E Harding, Barry Milne, Anthony Walters, Lisa Underwood, Martin von Randow, Lena Jacob, Greg D Gamble
{"title":"在两项随机试验参与者的随访研究中,将管理数据集用于结果评估的时间和成本。","authors":"Mohammad Shahbaz, Jane E Harding, Barry Milne, Anthony Walters, Lisa Underwood, Martin von Randow, Lena Jacob, Greg D Gamble","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02458-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the follow-up of participants in randomised trials, data linkage is thought a more cost-efficient method for assessing outcomes. However, researchers often encounter technical and budgetary challenges. Data requests often require a significant amount of information from researchers, and can take several years to process. This study aimed to determine the feasibility, direct costs and the total time required to access administrative datasets for assessment of outcomes in a follow-up study of two randomised trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied to access administrative datasets from New Zealand government agencies. All actions of study team members, along with their corresponding dates, were recorded prospectively for accessing data from each agency. Team members estimated the average time they spent on each action, and invoices from agencies were recorded. Additionally, we compared the estimated costs and time required for data linkage with those for obtaining self-reported questionnaires and conducting in-person assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight agencies were approached to supply data, of which seven gave approval. The time from first enquiry to receiving an initial dataset ranged from 96 to 854 days. For 859 participants, the estimated time required to obtain outcome data from agencies was 1,530 min; to obtain completed self-reported questionnaires was 11,025 min; and to complete in-person assessments was 77,310 min. The estimated total costs were 20,827 NZD for data linkage, 11,735 NZD for self-reported questionnaires, and 116,085 NZD for in-person assessments. Using this data, we estimate that for a cohort of 100 participants, the costs would be similar for data linkage and in-person assessments. For a cohort of 5,000 participants, we estimate that costs would be similar for data linkage and questionnaires, but ten-fold higher for in-person assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obtaining administrative datasets demands a substantial amount of time and effort. However, data linkage is a feasible method for outcome ascertainment in follow-up studies in New Zealand. For large cohorts, data linkage is likely to be less costly, whereas for small cohorts, in-person assessment has similar costs but is likely to be faster and allows direct assessment of outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time and cost of linking administrative datasets for outcomes assessment in a follow-up study of participants from two randomised trials.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Shahbaz, Jane E Harding, Barry Milne, Anthony Walters, Lisa Underwood, Martin von Randow, Lena Jacob, Greg D Gamble\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-025-02458-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For the follow-up of participants in randomised trials, data linkage is thought a more cost-efficient method for assessing outcomes. However, researchers often encounter technical and budgetary challenges. Data requests often require a significant amount of information from researchers, and can take several years to process. This study aimed to determine the feasibility, direct costs and the total time required to access administrative datasets for assessment of outcomes in a follow-up study of two randomised trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied to access administrative datasets from New Zealand government agencies. All actions of study team members, along with their corresponding dates, were recorded prospectively for accessing data from each agency. Team members estimated the average time they spent on each action, and invoices from agencies were recorded. Additionally, we compared the estimated costs and time required for data linkage with those for obtaining self-reported questionnaires and conducting in-person assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight agencies were approached to supply data, of which seven gave approval. The time from first enquiry to receiving an initial dataset ranged from 96 to 854 days. For 859 participants, the estimated time required to obtain outcome data from agencies was 1,530 min; to obtain completed self-reported questionnaires was 11,025 min; and to complete in-person assessments was 77,310 min. The estimated total costs were 20,827 NZD for data linkage, 11,735 NZD for self-reported questionnaires, and 116,085 NZD for in-person assessments. Using this data, we estimate that for a cohort of 100 participants, the costs would be similar for data linkage and in-person assessments. For a cohort of 5,000 participants, we estimate that costs would be similar for data linkage and questionnaires, but ten-fold higher for in-person assessments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obtaining administrative datasets demands a substantial amount of time and effort. However, data linkage is a feasible method for outcome ascertainment in follow-up studies in New Zealand. For large cohorts, data linkage is likely to be less costly, whereas for small cohorts, in-person assessment has similar costs but is likely to be faster and allows direct assessment of outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771019/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02458-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02458-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于随机试验参与者的随访,数据链接被认为是评估结果的更经济有效的方法。然而,研究人员经常遇到技术和预算方面的挑战。数据请求通常需要研究人员提供大量信息,并且可能需要数年时间来处理。本研究旨在确定可行性、直接成本和获取行政数据集以评估两项随机试验的随访研究结果所需的总时间。方法:我们申请访问来自新西兰政府机构的行政数据集。研究小组成员的所有行动及其相应的日期都被记录下来,以便从每个机构获取数据。团队成员估计了他们在每项行动上花费的平均时间,并记录了来自代理机构的发票。此外,我们比较了数据链接所需的估计成本和时间,以及获取自我报告问卷和进行现场评估的成本和时间。结果:联系了8家机构提供数据,其中7家获得批准。从第一次查询到收到初始数据集的时间为96至854天。对于859名参与者,从机构获得结果数据所需的估计时间为1,530分钟;获得完整的自我报告问卷用时11025分钟;完成面对面评估需要77,310分钟。估计数据链接的总成本为20,827新西兰元,自我报告问卷的总成本为11,735新西兰元,面对面评估的总成本为116,085新西兰元。使用这些数据,我们估计,对于100名参与者的队列,数据链接和亲自评估的成本将相似。对于5000名参与者的队列,我们估计数据链接和问卷调查的成本相似,但面对面评估的成本要高出10倍。结论:获取管理数据集需要大量的时间和精力。然而,在新西兰的随访研究中,数据链接是一种可行的结果确定方法。对于大型队列,数据链接的成本可能较低,而对于小型队列,亲自评估的成本相似,但可能更快,并允许直接评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time and cost of linking administrative datasets for outcomes assessment in a follow-up study of participants from two randomised trials.

Background: For the follow-up of participants in randomised trials, data linkage is thought a more cost-efficient method for assessing outcomes. However, researchers often encounter technical and budgetary challenges. Data requests often require a significant amount of information from researchers, and can take several years to process. This study aimed to determine the feasibility, direct costs and the total time required to access administrative datasets for assessment of outcomes in a follow-up study of two randomised trials.

Methods: We applied to access administrative datasets from New Zealand government agencies. All actions of study team members, along with their corresponding dates, were recorded prospectively for accessing data from each agency. Team members estimated the average time they spent on each action, and invoices from agencies were recorded. Additionally, we compared the estimated costs and time required for data linkage with those for obtaining self-reported questionnaires and conducting in-person assessments.

Results: Eight agencies were approached to supply data, of which seven gave approval. The time from first enquiry to receiving an initial dataset ranged from 96 to 854 days. For 859 participants, the estimated time required to obtain outcome data from agencies was 1,530 min; to obtain completed self-reported questionnaires was 11,025 min; and to complete in-person assessments was 77,310 min. The estimated total costs were 20,827 NZD for data linkage, 11,735 NZD for self-reported questionnaires, and 116,085 NZD for in-person assessments. Using this data, we estimate that for a cohort of 100 participants, the costs would be similar for data linkage and in-person assessments. For a cohort of 5,000 participants, we estimate that costs would be similar for data linkage and questionnaires, but ten-fold higher for in-person assessments.

Conclusions: Obtaining administrative datasets demands a substantial amount of time and effort. However, data linkage is a feasible method for outcome ascertainment in follow-up studies in New Zealand. For large cohorts, data linkage is likely to be less costly, whereas for small cohorts, in-person assessment has similar costs but is likely to be faster and allows direct assessment of outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
期刊最新文献
Experiences from conducting systematic reviews of systematic reviews. Predictive averaging and Rubin's rule-based model pooling to predict survival risk with imputations in the presence of missing patient data: methodology and verification using two case studies and simulations. Enhancing recruitment methodologies: leveraging the Tailored Design Method to survey populations with varied engagement in healthcare. Clustering longitudinal multivariate trajectories using an ensemble of principal component trees. Dynamic prediction of adverse outcomes in discharged COPD patients using patient-reported outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1