COVID-19患者血清蛋白质组学分析揭示了临床改善路径的关键因素。

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Translational Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1002/ctm2.70201
Hye Seong, Chae-Hyeon Lee, Seo-Gyu Park, Kyoung-Min Choi, Su-Min Lee, Jisoo Han, Ha-Song Bae, Su-Bhin Han, Sung-Jin Kim, Eunjung Kim, Jae-Young Kim, Joon Young Song
{"title":"COVID-19患者血清蛋白质组学分析揭示了临床改善路径的关键因素。","authors":"Hye Seong,&nbsp;Chae-Hyeon Lee,&nbsp;Seo-Gyu Park,&nbsp;Kyoung-Min Choi,&nbsp;Su-Min Lee,&nbsp;Jisoo Han,&nbsp;Ha-Song Bae,&nbsp;Su-Bhin Han,&nbsp;Sung-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Eunjung Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Young Kim,&nbsp;Joon Young Song","doi":"10.1002/ctm2.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>This study uncovers new molecular insights into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remission process and identifies potential predictive markers through proteomic profiling of patient serum, potentially guiding clinical decision making.</p><p>COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has triggered a global health crisis. Many proteomic studies using patient sera have been conducted to understand the host's response to this disease and identify potential therapeutic target.<span><sup>1-4</sup></span> However, the precise mechanisms underlying the diverse clinical presentations of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection remain unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have investigated the molecular factors or biomarkers that may influence clinical improvement of patients who have already exhibited severe symptoms. In this study, proteomic analysis of serum samples from a unique patient cohort, including individuals whose COVID-19 symptoms worsened and those who improved from moderate or severe conditions, identified 14 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Pathway and network analysis of these proteins revealed potential biological processes central to COVID-19 remission, particularly complement regulation. Remarkably, elevated levels of complement C2 in the patient serum could be an early marker for detecting clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19.</p><p>The study design, patient clinical data, and the proteomics analysis, including statistical and bioinformatics analysis, are detailed in the Supporting Information (Section 1). Briefly, proteomic analyses were conducted using sera collected from a cohort of 20 patients with COVID-19 and five healthy individuals as controls. Patients with COVID-19 were categorised into different prognostic groups based on the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Ordinal Scale score (Table S1): those who improved from mild COVID-19 (G1), individuals with deteriorating COVID-19 symptoms (G2), individuals who improved from moderate to mild COVID-19 (G3), and those who improved from severe to mild COVID-19 (G4). Table S2 presents the baseline characteristics of patients with COVID-19 and healthy controls, and Table S3 presents a comparison of the laboratory test results across the subject groups. After depleting high-abundance proteins using High-Select HSA/Immunoglobulin Depletion Resin (Thermo Scientific), sera from patients were processed for proteomic analysis via in-gel trypsin digestion and liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC‒MS/MS). The study design is illustrated in Figure 1. Using this proteomics approach, a total of 181 proteins were identified and quantified (Figure S1 and Dataset S1). Protein intensities were normalised,<span><sup>5</sup></span> and DEPs (fold-change &gt; 2, <i>p</i> &lt; .05) were identified using MaxQuant software and statistical tools. Pathway enrichment and interaction networks of DEPs were analysed using STRING database and DAVID functional annotation tool.</p><p>DEPs were defined based on the criteria of more than a twofold average change and a <i>p</i>-value below.05. Initially, the proteomic differences between healthy controls and group 1 (G1) patients were assessed. This yielded 29 DEPs, with 20 upregulated and nine downregulated in group G1 relative to the healthy controls (Table S4). Visual representations of these findings are shown in Figure S2A‒C. The interaction network from the STRING database emphasised that the interactions were mainly associated with complement activation and acute inflammatory responses (Figure S3A,B and Dataset S2). All patients in groups G2, G3 and G4 underwent the same treatment regimen. G2 patients deteriorated, whereas those in groups G3 and G4 improved to mild conditions. The principal aim of this study was to identify the serum protein markers that differentiate these response categories, potentially providing insight into disease progression and suggesting potential prognostic biomarkers. A comparison between G2 (deteriorating patients) and G3 (improving from moderate to mild) is illustrated in a volcano plot (Figure 2A). Three proteins, namely, PROC, A2MG and CFHA, were identified, with their expression upregulated in the clinically improved group. Conversely, six proteins, CLUS, APOA4, KLKB1, CO2, HV316 and PON1, were less abundant in the clinically improved group (Figure 2B,C and Dataset S3).</p><p>A parallel comparison between G2 and G4 resulted in the identification of three upregulated (C4BPA, CHLE and TTHY) and three downregulated (FETUB, CO2 and KAIN) proteins in G4 (Figure 3A‒C and Dataset S4). Notably, the CO2 (or complement C2) levels were consistently lower in both clinically improved groups. Given its role in the complement system and previous research linking complement dysregulation with severe COVID-19 outcomes,<span><sup>6-8</sup></span> higher basal CO2 levels may be associated with unfavorable patient outcomes. We have identified CO2, along with C4BPA, CFAH, KLKB1, PROC and A2MG, as notable biomarkers for determining COVID-19 prognosis.</p><p>Table S5 summarises 14 DEPs (six upregulated and eight downregulated) identified in the clinically improved groups from our two comparisons. The STRING database was used to map these proteins, revealing extensive interrelations, except for FETUB (Figure 4A). This relationship suggests the potential involvement of shared biological pathways or processes. Notably, functional annotation of these DEPs revealed a strong association with complement activation pathways (Figure 4B). Further analyses employing the DAVID functional annotation tool showed similar results, with persistent enrichment in complement pathways and related functionalities, such as innate immunity and blood coagulation (Figure 4C). Finally, the KEGG pathway analysis identified DEPs intricately tied to the complement and coagulation cascades (Figure 4D).</p><p>This study highlights key proteomic mechanisms influencing COVID-19 outcomes. Complement activation, particularly CO2, emerged as a major contributor to disease severity, driving inflammatory responses and coagulopathy. Regulatory proteins such as C4BPA and CFAH, upregulated in improved patients, could play protective roles by mitigating complement-induced tissue damage. Altered levels of KLKB1, PROC and A2MG link vascular dysfunction and thrombogenesis to clinical improvement of COVID-19, underscoring the interplay between inflammation, coagulation and vascular integrity. These findings provide deeper insights into COVID-19 pathophysiology, suggesting that therapeutic targeting of complement and coagulation pathways could improve clinical outcomes and aid clinical improvement in severely affected patients. Detailed evidence and explanations for our findings are provided in the Supporting Information (Section 2).</p><p>In conclusion, the proteomic investigation of the sera of patients with COVID-19 with varying prognoses revealed a panel of proteins that are potentially essential for disease progression and response to treatment. With the complement system emerging as a central player, this study not only offers a deeper molecular understanding of the disease but also highlights potential therapeutic avenues and prognostic markers warranting further exploration.</p><p><i>Conception and design</i>: Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. <i>Acquisition of data</i>: Seo-Gyu Park, Kyoung-Min Choi, Su-Min Lee, Jisoo Han, Ha-Song Bae, Su-Bhin Han, Sung-Jin Kim and Eunjung Kim. <i>Analysis and interpretation of data</i>: Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. <i>Writing and reviewing the manuscript</i>: Hye Seong, Chae-Hyeon Lee, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital (2020GR0570), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures were performed according to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>","PeriodicalId":10189,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proteomic profiling of the serum of patients with COVID-19 reveals key factors in the path to clinical improvement\",\"authors\":\"Hye Seong,&nbsp;Chae-Hyeon Lee,&nbsp;Seo-Gyu Park,&nbsp;Kyoung-Min Choi,&nbsp;Su-Min Lee,&nbsp;Jisoo Han,&nbsp;Ha-Song Bae,&nbsp;Su-Bhin Han,&nbsp;Sung-Jin Kim,&nbsp;Eunjung Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Young Kim,&nbsp;Joon Young Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ctm2.70201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>This study uncovers new molecular insights into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remission process and identifies potential predictive markers through proteomic profiling of patient serum, potentially guiding clinical decision making.</p><p>COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has triggered a global health crisis. Many proteomic studies using patient sera have been conducted to understand the host's response to this disease and identify potential therapeutic target.<span><sup>1-4</sup></span> However, the precise mechanisms underlying the diverse clinical presentations of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection remain unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have investigated the molecular factors or biomarkers that may influence clinical improvement of patients who have already exhibited severe symptoms. In this study, proteomic analysis of serum samples from a unique patient cohort, including individuals whose COVID-19 symptoms worsened and those who improved from moderate or severe conditions, identified 14 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Pathway and network analysis of these proteins revealed potential biological processes central to COVID-19 remission, particularly complement regulation. Remarkably, elevated levels of complement C2 in the patient serum could be an early marker for detecting clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19.</p><p>The study design, patient clinical data, and the proteomics analysis, including statistical and bioinformatics analysis, are detailed in the Supporting Information (Section 1). Briefly, proteomic analyses were conducted using sera collected from a cohort of 20 patients with COVID-19 and five healthy individuals as controls. Patients with COVID-19 were categorised into different prognostic groups based on the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Ordinal Scale score (Table S1): those who improved from mild COVID-19 (G1), individuals with deteriorating COVID-19 symptoms (G2), individuals who improved from moderate to mild COVID-19 (G3), and those who improved from severe to mild COVID-19 (G4). Table S2 presents the baseline characteristics of patients with COVID-19 and healthy controls, and Table S3 presents a comparison of the laboratory test results across the subject groups. After depleting high-abundance proteins using High-Select HSA/Immunoglobulin Depletion Resin (Thermo Scientific), sera from patients were processed for proteomic analysis via in-gel trypsin digestion and liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC‒MS/MS). The study design is illustrated in Figure 1. Using this proteomics approach, a total of 181 proteins were identified and quantified (Figure S1 and Dataset S1). Protein intensities were normalised,<span><sup>5</sup></span> and DEPs (fold-change &gt; 2, <i>p</i> &lt; .05) were identified using MaxQuant software and statistical tools. Pathway enrichment and interaction networks of DEPs were analysed using STRING database and DAVID functional annotation tool.</p><p>DEPs were defined based on the criteria of more than a twofold average change and a <i>p</i>-value below.05. Initially, the proteomic differences between healthy controls and group 1 (G1) patients were assessed. This yielded 29 DEPs, with 20 upregulated and nine downregulated in group G1 relative to the healthy controls (Table S4). Visual representations of these findings are shown in Figure S2A‒C. The interaction network from the STRING database emphasised that the interactions were mainly associated with complement activation and acute inflammatory responses (Figure S3A,B and Dataset S2). All patients in groups G2, G3 and G4 underwent the same treatment regimen. G2 patients deteriorated, whereas those in groups G3 and G4 improved to mild conditions. The principal aim of this study was to identify the serum protein markers that differentiate these response categories, potentially providing insight into disease progression and suggesting potential prognostic biomarkers. A comparison between G2 (deteriorating patients) and G3 (improving from moderate to mild) is illustrated in a volcano plot (Figure 2A). Three proteins, namely, PROC, A2MG and CFHA, were identified, with their expression upregulated in the clinically improved group. Conversely, six proteins, CLUS, APOA4, KLKB1, CO2, HV316 and PON1, were less abundant in the clinically improved group (Figure 2B,C and Dataset S3).</p><p>A parallel comparison between G2 and G4 resulted in the identification of three upregulated (C4BPA, CHLE and TTHY) and three downregulated (FETUB, CO2 and KAIN) proteins in G4 (Figure 3A‒C and Dataset S4). Notably, the CO2 (or complement C2) levels were consistently lower in both clinically improved groups. Given its role in the complement system and previous research linking complement dysregulation with severe COVID-19 outcomes,<span><sup>6-8</sup></span> higher basal CO2 levels may be associated with unfavorable patient outcomes. We have identified CO2, along with C4BPA, CFAH, KLKB1, PROC and A2MG, as notable biomarkers for determining COVID-19 prognosis.</p><p>Table S5 summarises 14 DEPs (six upregulated and eight downregulated) identified in the clinically improved groups from our two comparisons. The STRING database was used to map these proteins, revealing extensive interrelations, except for FETUB (Figure 4A). This relationship suggests the potential involvement of shared biological pathways or processes. Notably, functional annotation of these DEPs revealed a strong association with complement activation pathways (Figure 4B). Further analyses employing the DAVID functional annotation tool showed similar results, with persistent enrichment in complement pathways and related functionalities, such as innate immunity and blood coagulation (Figure 4C). Finally, the KEGG pathway analysis identified DEPs intricately tied to the complement and coagulation cascades (Figure 4D).</p><p>This study highlights key proteomic mechanisms influencing COVID-19 outcomes. Complement activation, particularly CO2, emerged as a major contributor to disease severity, driving inflammatory responses and coagulopathy. Regulatory proteins such as C4BPA and CFAH, upregulated in improved patients, could play protective roles by mitigating complement-induced tissue damage. Altered levels of KLKB1, PROC and A2MG link vascular dysfunction and thrombogenesis to clinical improvement of COVID-19, underscoring the interplay between inflammation, coagulation and vascular integrity. These findings provide deeper insights into COVID-19 pathophysiology, suggesting that therapeutic targeting of complement and coagulation pathways could improve clinical outcomes and aid clinical improvement in severely affected patients. Detailed evidence and explanations for our findings are provided in the Supporting Information (Section 2).</p><p>In conclusion, the proteomic investigation of the sera of patients with COVID-19 with varying prognoses revealed a panel of proteins that are potentially essential for disease progression and response to treatment. With the complement system emerging as a central player, this study not only offers a deeper molecular understanding of the disease but also highlights potential therapeutic avenues and prognostic markers warranting further exploration.</p><p><i>Conception and design</i>: Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. <i>Acquisition of data</i>: Seo-Gyu Park, Kyoung-Min Choi, Su-Min Lee, Jisoo Han, Ha-Song Bae, Su-Bhin Han, Sung-Jin Kim and Eunjung Kim. <i>Analysis and interpretation of data</i>: Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. <i>Writing and reviewing the manuscript</i>: Hye Seong, Chae-Hyeon Lee, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p><p>The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.</p><p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital (2020GR0570), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures were performed according to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctm2.70201\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ctm2.70201","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究揭示了冠状病毒病(COVID-19)缓解过程的新分子见解,并通过患者血清蛋白质组学分析确定了潜在的预测标志物,可能指导临床决策。由SARS-CoV-2病毒引起的COVID-19引发了全球卫生危机。许多使用患者血清的蛋白质组学研究已经进行,以了解宿主对这种疾病的反应并确定潜在的治疗靶点。1-4然而,SARS-CoV-2感染患者不同临床表现的确切机制尚不清楚。此外,只有少数研究调查了可能影响已经表现出严重症状的患者临床改善的分子因素或生物标志物。在这项研究中,对来自一个独特患者队列的血清样本进行蛋白质组学分析,包括COVID-19症状恶化的个体和从中度或重度病情改善的个体,鉴定出14种差异表达蛋白(dep)。这些蛋白的通路和网络分析揭示了COVID-19缓解的潜在生物学过程,特别是补体调节。值得注意的是,患者血清中补体C2水平升高可能是检测COVID-19患者临床恶化的早期标志。研究设计、患者临床数据和蛋白质组学分析(包括统计学和生物信息学分析)详见辅助信息(第1节)。简单地说,蛋白质组学分析是使用从20名COVID-19患者和5名健康个体作为对照的队列中收集的血清进行的。根据美国国家过敏症和传染病研究所的顺序量表评分(表S1),将COVID-19患者分为不同的预后组:从轻度COVID-19好转者(G1)、COVID-19症状恶化者(G2)、从中度至轻度COVID-19好转者(G3)、从重度至轻度COVID-19好转者(G4)。表S2给出了COVID-19患者和健康对照者的基线特征,表S3给出了各受试者组实验室检测结果的比较。在使用High-Select HSA/Immunoglobulin Depletion Resin (Thermo Scientific)耗尽高丰度蛋白质后,患者的血清通过凝胶胰酶消化和液相色谱-质谱/质谱(LC-MS /MS)处理进行蛋白质组学分析。研究设计如图1所示。使用这种蛋白质组学方法,共鉴定和量化了181个蛋白质(图S1和数据集S1)。蛋白强度归一化,5和DEPs (fold-change &gt;2、p &lt;.05),使用MaxQuant软件和统计工具进行鉴定。利用STRING数据库和DAVID功能注释工具分析了DEPs的通路富集和相互作用网络。dep是根据超过两倍平均变化和p值低于0.05的标准来定义的。首先,评估健康对照组和1组(G1)患者之间的蛋白质组学差异。与健康对照组相比,G1组产生29个dep,其中20个上调,9个下调(表S4)。这些发现的视觉表现如图S2A-C所示。来自STRING数据库的相互作用网络强调,相互作用主要与补体激活和急性炎症反应相关(图S3A,B和数据集S2)。G2、G3、G4组均采用相同的治疗方案。G2组患者病情恶化,而G3组和G4组患者病情好转至轻度。本研究的主要目的是确定区分这些反应类别的血清蛋白标记物,从而有可能深入了解疾病进展并提出潜在的预后生物标记物。G2(病情恶化)和G3(从中度好转到轻度好转)的比较如图2A所示。检测到PROC、A2MG和CFHA三种蛋白,临床改善组表达上调。相反,在临床改善组中,CLUS、APOA4、KLKB1、CO2、HV316和PON1这6种蛋白的含量较少(图2B、C和数据集S3)。在G2和G4之间进行平行比较,发现G4中有三个上调蛋白(C4BPA、CHLE和TTHY)和三个下调蛋白(FETUB、CO2和KAIN)(图3A-C和数据集S4)。值得注意的是,在临床改善的两组中,二氧化碳(或补体C2)水平持续降低。鉴于其在补体系统中的作用以及之前将补体失调与COVID-19严重结局联系起来的研究,6-8较高的基础CO2水平可能与不利的患者结局相关。我们已经确定CO2、C4BPA、CFAH、KLKB1、PROC和A2MG是确定COVID-19预后的重要生物标志物。 表S5总结了两组比较中临床改善组中发现的14个dep(6个上调,8个下调)。STRING数据库用于绘制这些蛋白的图谱,揭示了除FETUB外的广泛相互关系(图4A)。这种关系表明可能涉及共享的生物途径或过程。值得注意的是,这些DEPs的功能注释显示与补体激活途径密切相关(图4B)。使用DAVID功能注释工具的进一步分析显示了类似的结果,补体途径和相关功能(如先天免疫和血液凝固)持续富集(图4C)。最后,KEGG通路分析确定了与补体和凝血级联复杂相连的DEPs(图4D)。这项研究强调了影响COVID-19结局的关键蛋白质组学机制。补体激活,特别是二氧化碳,成为疾病严重程度的主要因素,驱动炎症反应和凝血病。调节蛋白,如C4BPA和CFAH,在改善的患者中上调,可以通过减轻补体诱导的组织损伤发挥保护作用。KLKB1、PROC和A2MG水平的改变将血管功能障碍和血栓形成与COVID-19的临床改善联系起来,强调了炎症、凝血和血管完整性之间的相互作用。这些发现对COVID-19的病理生理学有了更深入的了解,表明靶向补体和凝血途径的治疗可以改善临床结果,有助于重症患者的临床改善。支持信息(第2节)提供了我们研究结果的详细证据和解释。总之,对不同预后的COVID-19患者血清的蛋白质组学研究揭示了一组对疾病进展和治疗反应可能至关重要的蛋白质。随着补体系统的出现,这项研究不仅提供了对该疾病更深入的分子理解,而且还强调了潜在的治疗途径和预后标记物,值得进一步探索。概念和设计:Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim和Joon Young Song。数据采集:朴西圭、崔景敏、李秀敏、韩智秀、裴夏成、韩秀彬、金成镇、金恩中。数据分析与解释:成惠、金在荣、宋俊英。撰稿和审稿:成惠、李采贤、金在荣、宋俊英。所有作者都已阅读并同意稿件的出版版本。作者声明他们没有利益冲突。本研究经高丽大学九老医院机构审查委员会(2020GR0570)批准,并获得了所有参与者的书面知情同意。所有程序均按照机构和(或)国家研究委员会的道德标准和《赫尔辛基宣言》进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proteomic profiling of the serum of patients with COVID-19 reveals key factors in the path to clinical improvement

Dear Editor,

This study uncovers new molecular insights into the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remission process and identifies potential predictive markers through proteomic profiling of patient serum, potentially guiding clinical decision making.

COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has triggered a global health crisis. Many proteomic studies using patient sera have been conducted to understand the host's response to this disease and identify potential therapeutic target.1-4 However, the precise mechanisms underlying the diverse clinical presentations of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection remain unclear. Additionally, only a few studies have investigated the molecular factors or biomarkers that may influence clinical improvement of patients who have already exhibited severe symptoms. In this study, proteomic analysis of serum samples from a unique patient cohort, including individuals whose COVID-19 symptoms worsened and those who improved from moderate or severe conditions, identified 14 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Pathway and network analysis of these proteins revealed potential biological processes central to COVID-19 remission, particularly complement regulation. Remarkably, elevated levels of complement C2 in the patient serum could be an early marker for detecting clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19.

The study design, patient clinical data, and the proteomics analysis, including statistical and bioinformatics analysis, are detailed in the Supporting Information (Section 1). Briefly, proteomic analyses were conducted using sera collected from a cohort of 20 patients with COVID-19 and five healthy individuals as controls. Patients with COVID-19 were categorised into different prognostic groups based on the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Ordinal Scale score (Table S1): those who improved from mild COVID-19 (G1), individuals with deteriorating COVID-19 symptoms (G2), individuals who improved from moderate to mild COVID-19 (G3), and those who improved from severe to mild COVID-19 (G4). Table S2 presents the baseline characteristics of patients with COVID-19 and healthy controls, and Table S3 presents a comparison of the laboratory test results across the subject groups. After depleting high-abundance proteins using High-Select HSA/Immunoglobulin Depletion Resin (Thermo Scientific), sera from patients were processed for proteomic analysis via in-gel trypsin digestion and liquid chromatography‒mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC‒MS/MS). The study design is illustrated in Figure 1. Using this proteomics approach, a total of 181 proteins were identified and quantified (Figure S1 and Dataset S1). Protein intensities were normalised,5 and DEPs (fold-change > 2, p < .05) were identified using MaxQuant software and statistical tools. Pathway enrichment and interaction networks of DEPs were analysed using STRING database and DAVID functional annotation tool.

DEPs were defined based on the criteria of more than a twofold average change and a p-value below.05. Initially, the proteomic differences between healthy controls and group 1 (G1) patients were assessed. This yielded 29 DEPs, with 20 upregulated and nine downregulated in group G1 relative to the healthy controls (Table S4). Visual representations of these findings are shown in Figure S2A‒C. The interaction network from the STRING database emphasised that the interactions were mainly associated with complement activation and acute inflammatory responses (Figure S3A,B and Dataset S2). All patients in groups G2, G3 and G4 underwent the same treatment regimen. G2 patients deteriorated, whereas those in groups G3 and G4 improved to mild conditions. The principal aim of this study was to identify the serum protein markers that differentiate these response categories, potentially providing insight into disease progression and suggesting potential prognostic biomarkers. A comparison between G2 (deteriorating patients) and G3 (improving from moderate to mild) is illustrated in a volcano plot (Figure 2A). Three proteins, namely, PROC, A2MG and CFHA, were identified, with their expression upregulated in the clinically improved group. Conversely, six proteins, CLUS, APOA4, KLKB1, CO2, HV316 and PON1, were less abundant in the clinically improved group (Figure 2B,C and Dataset S3).

A parallel comparison between G2 and G4 resulted in the identification of three upregulated (C4BPA, CHLE and TTHY) and three downregulated (FETUB, CO2 and KAIN) proteins in G4 (Figure 3A‒C and Dataset S4). Notably, the CO2 (or complement C2) levels were consistently lower in both clinically improved groups. Given its role in the complement system and previous research linking complement dysregulation with severe COVID-19 outcomes,6-8 higher basal CO2 levels may be associated with unfavorable patient outcomes. We have identified CO2, along with C4BPA, CFAH, KLKB1, PROC and A2MG, as notable biomarkers for determining COVID-19 prognosis.

Table S5 summarises 14 DEPs (six upregulated and eight downregulated) identified in the clinically improved groups from our two comparisons. The STRING database was used to map these proteins, revealing extensive interrelations, except for FETUB (Figure 4A). This relationship suggests the potential involvement of shared biological pathways or processes. Notably, functional annotation of these DEPs revealed a strong association with complement activation pathways (Figure 4B). Further analyses employing the DAVID functional annotation tool showed similar results, with persistent enrichment in complement pathways and related functionalities, such as innate immunity and blood coagulation (Figure 4C). Finally, the KEGG pathway analysis identified DEPs intricately tied to the complement and coagulation cascades (Figure 4D).

This study highlights key proteomic mechanisms influencing COVID-19 outcomes. Complement activation, particularly CO2, emerged as a major contributor to disease severity, driving inflammatory responses and coagulopathy. Regulatory proteins such as C4BPA and CFAH, upregulated in improved patients, could play protective roles by mitigating complement-induced tissue damage. Altered levels of KLKB1, PROC and A2MG link vascular dysfunction and thrombogenesis to clinical improvement of COVID-19, underscoring the interplay between inflammation, coagulation and vascular integrity. These findings provide deeper insights into COVID-19 pathophysiology, suggesting that therapeutic targeting of complement and coagulation pathways could improve clinical outcomes and aid clinical improvement in severely affected patients. Detailed evidence and explanations for our findings are provided in the Supporting Information (Section 2).

In conclusion, the proteomic investigation of the sera of patients with COVID-19 with varying prognoses revealed a panel of proteins that are potentially essential for disease progression and response to treatment. With the complement system emerging as a central player, this study not only offers a deeper molecular understanding of the disease but also highlights potential therapeutic avenues and prognostic markers warranting further exploration.

Conception and design: Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. Acquisition of data: Seo-Gyu Park, Kyoung-Min Choi, Su-Min Lee, Jisoo Han, Ha-Song Bae, Su-Bhin Han, Sung-Jin Kim and Eunjung Kim. Analysis and interpretation of data: Hye Seong, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. Writing and reviewing the manuscript: Hye Seong, Chae-Hyeon Lee, Jae-Young Kim and Joon Young Song. All the authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Guro Hospital (2020GR0570), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All procedures were performed according to the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
1.90%
发文量
450
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Medicine (CTM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal dedicated to accelerating the translation of preclinical research into clinical applications and fostering communication between basic and clinical scientists. It highlights the clinical potential and application of various fields including biotechnologies, biomaterials, bioengineering, biomarkers, molecular medicine, omics science, bioinformatics, immunology, molecular imaging, drug discovery, regulation, and health policy. With a focus on the bench-to-bedside approach, CTM prioritizes studies and clinical observations that generate hypotheses relevant to patients and diseases, guiding investigations in cellular and molecular medicine. The journal encourages submissions from clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and industry professionals.
期刊最新文献
Refining inflammatory profiles linked to cardiometabolic outcomes in people with HIV using recursive feature addition modelling NAT10-mediated N4-acetylcytidine modification drives RNA splicing of PML to alleviate adipose-derived stem cell senescence and promote diabetic wound healing Super-enhancer-driven KIAA1522 upregulation suppresses ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma Single-cell profiling reveals peripheral blood immune landscape remodelling in breast cancer lymph node metastasis Multi-omics insights for deciphering prognosis-related T cell subsets in hepatocellular carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1