喉上神经阻滞治疗慢性神经性咳嗽的远期疗效观察。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s00405-025-09222-1
Tanner J Diemer, Brian A Keith, Shaun A Nguyen, Ashli K O'Rourke
{"title":"喉上神经阻滞治疗慢性神经性咳嗽的远期疗效观察。","authors":"Tanner J Diemer, Brian A Keith, Shaun A Nguyen, Ashli K O'Rourke","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09222-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block for treating chronic neurogenic cough (CNC) in a large patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients treated between January 2019 and October 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, number of injections, follow-up times, subjective cough severity, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 117 patients (76.1% female; mean age 66.1), the median number of injections was 3, with a median follow-up duration of 4 weeks. Subjective improvement was reported in 74.4% of cases, with mild adverse events occurring in 8.4% of injections. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between decreased subjective severity and time. LCQ scores improved slightly within 1-3 months and 25-40 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that SLN blocks effectively reduce subjective severity and improve LCQ scores long-term, with sequential injections potentially reducing chronic steroid use risks. Further prospective studies are recommended to optimize dosing intervals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"1393-1398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term efficacy of superior laryngeal nerve block for the treatment of chronic neurogenic cough.\",\"authors\":\"Tanner J Diemer, Brian A Keith, Shaun A Nguyen, Ashli K O'Rourke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09222-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block for treating chronic neurogenic cough (CNC) in a large patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on patients treated between January 2019 and October 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, number of injections, follow-up times, subjective cough severity, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 117 patients (76.1% female; mean age 66.1), the median number of injections was 3, with a median follow-up duration of 4 weeks. Subjective improvement was reported in 74.4% of cases, with mild adverse events occurring in 8.4% of injections. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between decreased subjective severity and time. LCQ scores improved slightly within 1-3 months and 25-40 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that SLN blocks effectively reduce subjective severity and improve LCQ scores long-term, with sequential injections potentially reducing chronic steroid use risks. Further prospective studies are recommended to optimize dosing intervals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1393-1398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09222-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09222-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估喉上神经(SLN)阻滞治疗慢性神经性咳嗽(CNC)的长期疗效和安全性。方法:对2019年1月至2023年10月期间接受治疗的患者进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括患者人口统计数据、注射次数、随访时间、主观咳嗽严重程度和莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)得分。结果:117例患者中,女性占76.1%;平均年龄66.1岁),中位注射次数为3次,中位随访时间为4周。74.4%的患者主观改善,8.4%的患者出现轻微不良事件。回归分析显示主观严重程度的降低与时间有很强的相关性。在1-3个月和25-40个月内,LCQ得分略有改善。结论:研究结果表明,SLN阻滞可有效降低主观严重程度并长期改善LCQ评分,连续注射可能降低慢性类固醇使用风险。建议进一步的前瞻性研究以优化给药间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term efficacy of superior laryngeal nerve block for the treatment of chronic neurogenic cough.

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) block for treating chronic neurogenic cough (CNC) in a large patient cohort.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients treated between January 2019 and October 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, number of injections, follow-up times, subjective cough severity, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) scores.

Results: Among 117 patients (76.1% female; mean age 66.1), the median number of injections was 3, with a median follow-up duration of 4 weeks. Subjective improvement was reported in 74.4% of cases, with mild adverse events occurring in 8.4% of injections. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation between decreased subjective severity and time. LCQ scores improved slightly within 1-3 months and 25-40 months.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that SLN blocks effectively reduce subjective severity and improve LCQ scores long-term, with sequential injections potentially reducing chronic steroid use risks. Further prospective studies are recommended to optimize dosing intervals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in adults with and without metabolic syndrome using real-world data. Patient education on Instagram? Structured content analysis of the hashtag "obstructivesleepapnea". Effectiveness of aerobic exercise training in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Correction: Evaluating the relationship between obstructive sleep apnea and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in adults with and without metabolic syndrome using real-world data. Diagnostic potential of biomarkers in the assessment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea-A systematic review and meta- analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1