裙边砂桩与深水泥桩改善层状土中圆形基础荷载-沉降响应的数值研究:中心和偏心效应。

IF 3.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Heliyon Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41710
Hussein Ahmad
{"title":"裙边砂桩与深水泥桩改善层状土中圆形基础荷载-沉降响应的数值研究:中心和偏心效应。","authors":"Hussein Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the performance of a skirt sand pile (SSP) system beneath a circular shallow footing using three-dimensional finite element analysis calibrated against a large-scale experimental setup. The SSP, measuring 8.00 m in length and 1.00 m in diameter, was analyzed in a soft clay-sandy soil environment. The Mohr-Coulomb, hardening soil, and linear elastic models were employed to simulate the soil and structural elements. The innovative aspect of this study lies in the comprehensive evaluation of the SSP system's load-bearing capacity and settlement behavior, revealing its superior performance compared to deep cement pile (DCP). Numerical results demonstrated LBR improvements of 1.7 and 1.4 at settlement ratios (s/B%) of 10 % and 15 %, respectively, for the SSP, compared to LBRs of 1.3 and 1.1 for DCM. Additionally, the study explores the significant Influence of increasing SSP length (by 180 %), which resulted in a much greater increase in load-bearing capacity compared to similar changes in DCM. Another key innovation is the analysis of soil cohesion and friction angle effects, where increasing these parameters resulted in a reduction in settlement ratios from 36 % to 12 %, with the load-bearing capacity improving from 2 to 3.7. A significant and innovative aspect of this study is the soil-skirt sandpile interaction, which was found to have a much greater effect on the load-bearing capacity and settlement behavior than the traditional soil-deep cement pile interaction. This study provides critical insights into the efficacy of SSP systems in enhancing foundation performance, offering a cost-effective, efficient alternative to traditional deep cement pile, especially in layered clay-sand soil environments. The findings provide practical guidance for optimizing foundation design and improving the sustainability of geotechnical engineering solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12894,"journal":{"name":"Heliyon","volume":"11 2","pages":"e41710"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical study of comparing skirt sandpile with deep cement pile to improve load‒settlement response of circular footing in layered soils: Centric and eccentric effects.\",\"authors\":\"Hussein Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the performance of a skirt sand pile (SSP) system beneath a circular shallow footing using three-dimensional finite element analysis calibrated against a large-scale experimental setup. The SSP, measuring 8.00 m in length and 1.00 m in diameter, was analyzed in a soft clay-sandy soil environment. The Mohr-Coulomb, hardening soil, and linear elastic models were employed to simulate the soil and structural elements. The innovative aspect of this study lies in the comprehensive evaluation of the SSP system's load-bearing capacity and settlement behavior, revealing its superior performance compared to deep cement pile (DCP). Numerical results demonstrated LBR improvements of 1.7 and 1.4 at settlement ratios (s/B%) of 10 % and 15 %, respectively, for the SSP, compared to LBRs of 1.3 and 1.1 for DCM. Additionally, the study explores the significant Influence of increasing SSP length (by 180 %), which resulted in a much greater increase in load-bearing capacity compared to similar changes in DCM. Another key innovation is the analysis of soil cohesion and friction angle effects, where increasing these parameters resulted in a reduction in settlement ratios from 36 % to 12 %, with the load-bearing capacity improving from 2 to 3.7. A significant and innovative aspect of this study is the soil-skirt sandpile interaction, which was found to have a much greater effect on the load-bearing capacity and settlement behavior than the traditional soil-deep cement pile interaction. This study provides critical insights into the efficacy of SSP systems in enhancing foundation performance, offering a cost-effective, efficient alternative to traditional deep cement pile, especially in layered clay-sand soil environments. The findings provide practical guidance for optimizing foundation design and improving the sustainability of geotechnical engineering solutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heliyon\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"e41710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heliyon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41710\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heliyon","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41710","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对圆形浅基础下裙边砂桩(SSP)系统的性能进行了三维有限元分析,并对大型实验装置进行了校准。在软粘土-砂土环境中对长8.00 m、直径1.00 m的SSP进行了分析。采用莫尔-库仑模型、硬化土模型和线弹性模型对土体和结构单元进行了模拟。本研究的创新之处在于对SSP体系的承载能力和沉降行为进行了综合评价,揭示了其相对于深埋水泥桩(DCP)的优越性能。数值结果表明,在沉降比(s/B%)分别为10%和15%时,SSP的LBR分别提高了1.7和1.4,而DCM的LBR分别为1.3和1.1。此外,该研究还探讨了SSP长度增加(增加180%)的显著影响,与DCM的类似变化相比,SSP长度增加导致承载能力增加得多。另一个关键的创新是分析土壤黏聚力和摩擦角的影响,其中增加这些参数导致沉降比从36%降低到12%,承载能力从2提高到3.7。本研究的一个重要和创新的方面是土-裙边砂桩相互作用,它比传统的土-深水泥土桩相互作用对承载能力和沉降行为的影响要大得多。本研究为SSP系统在提高地基性能方面的有效性提供了重要见解,为传统的深层水泥桩提供了一种经济高效的替代方案,特别是在层状粘土-砂土环境中。研究结果为优化基础设计和提高岩土工程解决方案的可持续性提供了实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical study of comparing skirt sandpile with deep cement pile to improve load‒settlement response of circular footing in layered soils: Centric and eccentric effects.

This study investigates the performance of a skirt sand pile (SSP) system beneath a circular shallow footing using three-dimensional finite element analysis calibrated against a large-scale experimental setup. The SSP, measuring 8.00 m in length and 1.00 m in diameter, was analyzed in a soft clay-sandy soil environment. The Mohr-Coulomb, hardening soil, and linear elastic models were employed to simulate the soil and structural elements. The innovative aspect of this study lies in the comprehensive evaluation of the SSP system's load-bearing capacity and settlement behavior, revealing its superior performance compared to deep cement pile (DCP). Numerical results demonstrated LBR improvements of 1.7 and 1.4 at settlement ratios (s/B%) of 10 % and 15 %, respectively, for the SSP, compared to LBRs of 1.3 and 1.1 for DCM. Additionally, the study explores the significant Influence of increasing SSP length (by 180 %), which resulted in a much greater increase in load-bearing capacity compared to similar changes in DCM. Another key innovation is the analysis of soil cohesion and friction angle effects, where increasing these parameters resulted in a reduction in settlement ratios from 36 % to 12 %, with the load-bearing capacity improving from 2 to 3.7. A significant and innovative aspect of this study is the soil-skirt sandpile interaction, which was found to have a much greater effect on the load-bearing capacity and settlement behavior than the traditional soil-deep cement pile interaction. This study provides critical insights into the efficacy of SSP systems in enhancing foundation performance, offering a cost-effective, efficient alternative to traditional deep cement pile, especially in layered clay-sand soil environments. The findings provide practical guidance for optimizing foundation design and improving the sustainability of geotechnical engineering solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heliyon
Heliyon MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
2793
期刊介绍: Heliyon is an all-science, open access journal that is part of the Cell Press family. Any paper reporting scientifically accurate and valuable research, which adheres to accepted ethical and scientific publishing standards, will be considered for publication. Our growing team of dedicated section editors, along with our in-house team, handle your paper and manage the publication process end-to-end, giving your research the editorial support it deserves.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study" [Heliyon Volume 10, Issue 4, February 2024, Article e25912]. Retraction notice to "Enhancing data security and privacy in energy applications: Integrating IoT and blockchain technologies" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e38917]. Retraction notice to "CREB1 promotes cholangiocarcinoma metastasis through transcriptional regulation of the LAYN-mediated TLN1/β1 integrin axis" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36595]. Retraction notice to "Experimental investigations of dual functional substrate integrated waveguide antenna with enhanced directivity for 5G mobile communications" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e36929]. Retraction notice to "Nutritional and bioactive properties and antioxidant potential of Amaranthus tricolor, A. lividus, A viridis, and A. spinosus leafy vegetables" [Heliyon 10 (2024) e30453].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1