最后一年本科护理学生修订的药物管理准备问卷的心理测量评估:二次分析。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02699-5
Susan Irvine, Sharon Andrew, Christina Aggar, Nicola Whiteing, Anecita Gigi Lim, Brett Williams
{"title":"最后一年本科护理学生修订的药物管理准备问卷的心理测量评估:二次分析。","authors":"Susan Irvine, Sharon Andrew, Christina Aggar, Nicola Whiteing, Anecita Gigi Lim, Brett Williams","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02699-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students must be prepared for the transference of medication administration (pharmacology knowledge and clinical skills) to clinical practice. The Preparedness for Medication Oral Administration questionnaire has been used in several studies and demonstrated strong internal reliability and consistency. The questionnaire has been revised to align with updated medication competencies. The factor structure or dimensionality of the questionnaires has not been examined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the psychometric properties of the Preparedness for Medication Administration (Revised) Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from a previous study were used to determine the psychometric properties of the Preparedness for Medication Administration (Revised) Questionnaire. Three new items were added to the revised questionnaire, and the focus shifted from the oral route of medication administration. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to assess the reliability and dimensionality of the revised questionnaire, using principal axis factoring and Oblique rotation on the 20 items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fourteen final-year undergraduate nursing students completed the questionnaire; the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure confirmed sampling adequacy (.96) and Bartlett's test of sphericity χ<sup>2</sup>(214) 3003.534 p < .001 adequate sample size-to-variable ratio and inspection of the correlation matrix for loadings > 0.30. The 20 items produced a 2-factor solution, which was also confirmed by parallel analysis, with the deletion of 4 items not meeting item loadings of > 0.4. The final revised version of the questionnaire titled the Preparedness for Medication Administration Revision2 (PMAR2) contained 16 items loading onto one of the 2 factors titled Clinical Reasoning and Confidence to Practice Safely. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the factors were .89 to .95, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research provides information for a psychometrically sound tool to assess students' preparedness for medication administration once they graduate and become independent practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A psychometric appraisal of a revised preparedness for medication administration questionnaire in final-year undergraduate nursing students: a secondary analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Susan Irvine, Sharon Andrew, Christina Aggar, Nicola Whiteing, Anecita Gigi Lim, Brett Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12912-025-02699-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students must be prepared for the transference of medication administration (pharmacology knowledge and clinical skills) to clinical practice. The Preparedness for Medication Oral Administration questionnaire has been used in several studies and demonstrated strong internal reliability and consistency. The questionnaire has been revised to align with updated medication competencies. The factor structure or dimensionality of the questionnaires has not been examined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the psychometric properties of the Preparedness for Medication Administration (Revised) Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data from a previous study were used to determine the psychometric properties of the Preparedness for Medication Administration (Revised) Questionnaire. Three new items were added to the revised questionnaire, and the focus shifted from the oral route of medication administration. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to assess the reliability and dimensionality of the revised questionnaire, using principal axis factoring and Oblique rotation on the 20 items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred fourteen final-year undergraduate nursing students completed the questionnaire; the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure confirmed sampling adequacy (.96) and Bartlett's test of sphericity χ<sup>2</sup>(214) 3003.534 p < .001 adequate sample size-to-variable ratio and inspection of the correlation matrix for loadings > 0.30. The 20 items produced a 2-factor solution, which was also confirmed by parallel analysis, with the deletion of 4 items not meeting item loadings of > 0.4. The final revised version of the questionnaire titled the Preparedness for Medication Administration Revision2 (PMAR2) contained 16 items loading onto one of the 2 factors titled Clinical Reasoning and Confidence to Practice Safely. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the factors were .89 to .95, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research provides information for a psychometrically sound tool to assess students' preparedness for medication administration once they graduate and become independent practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773837/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02699-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02699-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学生必须准备好将药物管理(药理学知识和临床技能)转移到临床实践中。口服给药准备问卷已在几项研究中使用,并显示出很强的内部信度和一致性。问卷已修订,以配合最新的用药能力。问卷的因素结构或维度尚未被检验。目的:探讨《给药准备(修订)问卷》的心理测量特征。方法:采用先前研究的数据来确定药物管理准备(修订)问卷的心理测量特性。修订后的问卷增加了3个新项目,重点从口服给药途径转移。采用主轴因子分析和倾斜旋转法对20个项目进行问卷调查,对问卷的信度和维度进行了探索性因子分析。结果:共224名护生完成问卷;Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin测度证实了抽样充分性(0.96)和Bartlett球度检验χ2(214) 3003.534 p 0.30。这20个项目产生了一个2因素的解决方案,这也得到了平行分析的证实,删除了4个不满足> 0.4的项目负荷。最终修订的问卷名为《药物管理准备修订2》(PMAR2),包含16个项目,加载到名为“临床推理和安全实践信心”的两个因素中的一个。各因子的Cronbach alpha系数分别为0.89 ~ 0.95。结论:本研究提供了一种心理测量学上可靠的工具来评估学生在毕业后成为独立医生后对药物管理的准备情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A psychometric appraisal of a revised preparedness for medication administration questionnaire in final-year undergraduate nursing students: a secondary analysis.

Background: Students must be prepared for the transference of medication administration (pharmacology knowledge and clinical skills) to clinical practice. The Preparedness for Medication Oral Administration questionnaire has been used in several studies and demonstrated strong internal reliability and consistency. The questionnaire has been revised to align with updated medication competencies. The factor structure or dimensionality of the questionnaires has not been examined.

Aim: To examine the psychometric properties of the Preparedness for Medication Administration (Revised) Questionnaire.

Method: Data from a previous study were used to determine the psychometric properties of the Preparedness for Medication Administration (Revised) Questionnaire. Three new items were added to the revised questionnaire, and the focus shifted from the oral route of medication administration. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to assess the reliability and dimensionality of the revised questionnaire, using principal axis factoring and Oblique rotation on the 20 items.

Results: Two hundred fourteen final-year undergraduate nursing students completed the questionnaire; the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure confirmed sampling adequacy (.96) and Bartlett's test of sphericity χ2(214) 3003.534 p < .001 adequate sample size-to-variable ratio and inspection of the correlation matrix for loadings > 0.30. The 20 items produced a 2-factor solution, which was also confirmed by parallel analysis, with the deletion of 4 items not meeting item loadings of > 0.4. The final revised version of the questionnaire titled the Preparedness for Medication Administration Revision2 (PMAR2) contained 16 items loading onto one of the 2 factors titled Clinical Reasoning and Confidence to Practice Safely. Cronbach alpha coefficients for the factors were .89 to .95, respectively.

Conclusion: This research provides information for a psychometrically sound tool to assess students' preparedness for medication administration once they graduate and become independent practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Associations between personality traits, cross-cultural competence and cultural intelligence of nurses: a national cross-sectional study in Poland. First aid educational needs among nursing officers in military primary clinics: a mixed-methods study. Nursing care for adult urostomy patient in China: synthesis of evidence and a modified delphi study. Perfectionism, rumination, and job stress among operating room nurses in Tehran, Iran: a cross-sectional study. Reflective learning experiences of nursing students in a COVID-19 disaster simulation: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1