人工智能支持的肥胖预测:队列数据分析的系统回顾。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105804
Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori , Farid Najafi , Hajar Hasannejadasl , Soroush Heydari
{"title":"人工智能支持的肥胖预测:队列数据分析的系统回顾。","authors":"Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori ,&nbsp;Farid Najafi ,&nbsp;Hajar Hasannejadasl ,&nbsp;Soroush Heydari","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obesity, now the fifth leading global cause of death, has seen a dramatic rise in prevalence over the last forty years. It significantly increases the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Early identification of obesity risk allows for preventative actions against obesity-related factors. Despite the existence of AI-based predictive models, developing a comprehensive obesity screening tool requires extensive cohort data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A thorough review of 6,351 articles, focusing on AI predictions for obesity in cohort studies, was conducted up to March 2024 across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using the JBI checklist, 10 studies involving 411,580 participants were critically appraised. These cohorts varied in length and size, with half lasting 1–5 years and involving less than 5,000 participants. The data types were categorized into nine groups, with demographic (7 studies) and biomarker data (4 studies) being the most frequently used. Machine learning was predominantly used (95 % of studies), mostly employing supervised learning techniques. Algorithms like random forest (RF) (18 %), linear regression (18 %), and stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) (14 %) were common. Top-performing models were noted for k-means (accuracy of 0.977), artificial neural networks (AUC of 0.99), GBM (specificity of 0.95 and sensitivity of 0.65), RF (RMSE of 0.146), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (r-squared of 0.684).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings indicate that AI algorithms can predict obesity; however, further research is needed to assess their effectiveness in analyzing obesity-related data and examine most advanced AI methods. This review is a valuable resource for dietitians and researchers engaged in developing predictive models and intelligent clinical decision support systems using AI technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-enabled obesity prediction: A systematic review of cohort data analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori ,&nbsp;Farid Najafi ,&nbsp;Hajar Hasannejadasl ,&nbsp;Soroush Heydari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obesity, now the fifth leading global cause of death, has seen a dramatic rise in prevalence over the last forty years. It significantly increases the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Early identification of obesity risk allows for preventative actions against obesity-related factors. Despite the existence of AI-based predictive models, developing a comprehensive obesity screening tool requires extensive cohort data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A thorough review of 6,351 articles, focusing on AI predictions for obesity in cohort studies, was conducted up to March 2024 across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using the JBI checklist, 10 studies involving 411,580 participants were critically appraised. These cohorts varied in length and size, with half lasting 1–5 years and involving less than 5,000 participants. The data types were categorized into nine groups, with demographic (7 studies) and biomarker data (4 studies) being the most frequently used. Machine learning was predominantly used (95 % of studies), mostly employing supervised learning techniques. Algorithms like random forest (RF) (18 %), linear regression (18 %), and stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) (14 %) were common. Top-performing models were noted for k-means (accuracy of 0.977), artificial neural networks (AUC of 0.99), GBM (specificity of 0.95 and sensitivity of 0.65), RF (RMSE of 0.146), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (r-squared of 0.684).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings indicate that AI algorithms can predict obesity; however, further research is needed to assess their effectiveness in analyzing obesity-related data and examine most advanced AI methods. This review is a valuable resource for dietitians and researchers engaged in developing predictive models and intelligent clinical decision support systems using AI technology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖,现在是全球第五大死亡原因,在过去的四十年中发病率急剧上升。它会显著增加患2型糖尿病和心血管疾病等疾病的风险。对肥胖风险的早期识别有助于对肥胖相关因素采取预防措施。尽管存在基于人工智能的预测模型,但开发全面的肥胖筛查工具需要大量的队列数据。方法:截至2024年3月,对6,351篇文章进行了全面审查,重点关注队列研究中人工智能对肥胖的预测,涉及PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库。结果:使用JBI检查表,对涉及411,580名参与者的10项研究进行了批判性评估。这些队列的长度和规模各不相同,其中一半持续1-5年,参与者不到5000人。数据类型分为9组,其中最常用的是人口统计学(7项研究)和生物标志物数据(4项研究)。主要使用机器学习(95%的研究),主要采用监督学习技术。随机森林(RF)(18%)、线性回归(18%)和随机梯度增强(GBM)(14%)等算法是常见的。k-means(准确率为0.977)、人工神经网络(AUC为0.99)、GBM(特异性为0.95,灵敏度为0.65)、RF (RMSE为0.146)以及最小的绝对收缩和选择算子(r-squared为0.684)均获得了最佳表现。结论:研究结果表明,AI算法可以预测肥胖;然而,为了评估它们在分析肥胖相关数据和检验最先进的人工智能方法方面的有效性,还需要进一步的研究。这篇综述对于使用人工智能技术开发预测模型和智能临床决策支持系统的营养师和研究人员来说是一个宝贵的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial intelligence-enabled obesity prediction: A systematic review of cohort data analysis

Background

Obesity, now the fifth leading global cause of death, has seen a dramatic rise in prevalence over the last forty years. It significantly increases the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Early identification of obesity risk allows for preventative actions against obesity-related factors. Despite the existence of AI-based predictive models, developing a comprehensive obesity screening tool requires extensive cohort data.

Methods

A thorough review of 6,351 articles, focusing on AI predictions for obesity in cohort studies, was conducted up to March 2024 across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Results

Using the JBI checklist, 10 studies involving 411,580 participants were critically appraised. These cohorts varied in length and size, with half lasting 1–5 years and involving less than 5,000 participants. The data types were categorized into nine groups, with demographic (7 studies) and biomarker data (4 studies) being the most frequently used. Machine learning was predominantly used (95 % of studies), mostly employing supervised learning techniques. Algorithms like random forest (RF) (18 %), linear regression (18 %), and stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) (14 %) were common. Top-performing models were noted for k-means (accuracy of 0.977), artificial neural networks (AUC of 0.99), GBM (specificity of 0.95 and sensitivity of 0.65), RF (RMSE of 0.146), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (r-squared of 0.684).

Conclusion

Findings indicate that AI algorithms can predict obesity; however, further research is needed to assess their effectiveness in analyzing obesity-related data and examine most advanced AI methods. This review is a valuable resource for dietitians and researchers engaged in developing predictive models and intelligent clinical decision support systems using AI technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Performance of large language models and clinical decision support in perioperative management of oral anticoagulants Mobile applications for time and event management in older adults and their careagivers: A scoping review How improper dataset split hinders model generalizability: a systematic comparison in Human activity recognition and exercise evaluation tasks Factors influencing older adults’ acceptance and usability of assistive technology services: A longitudinal multilevel analysis Empowering open medium-sized generative language models for effective structured search in biomedical systematic reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1