{"title":"人工智能支持的肥胖预测:队列数据分析的系统回顾。","authors":"Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori , Farid Najafi , Hajar Hasannejadasl , Soroush Heydari","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obesity, now the fifth leading global cause of death, has seen a dramatic rise in prevalence over the last forty years. It significantly increases the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Early identification of obesity risk allows for preventative actions against obesity-related factors. Despite the existence of AI-based predictive models, developing a comprehensive obesity screening tool requires extensive cohort data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A thorough review of 6,351 articles, focusing on AI predictions for obesity in cohort studies, was conducted up to March 2024 across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using the JBI checklist, 10 studies involving 411,580 participants were critically appraised. These cohorts varied in length and size, with half lasting 1–5 years and involving less than 5,000 participants. The data types were categorized into nine groups, with demographic (7 studies) and biomarker data (4 studies) being the most frequently used. Machine learning was predominantly used (95 % of studies), mostly employing supervised learning techniques. Algorithms like random forest (RF) (18 %), linear regression (18 %), and stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) (14 %) were common. Top-performing models were noted for k-means (accuracy of 0.977), artificial neural networks (AUC of 0.99), GBM (specificity of 0.95 and sensitivity of 0.65), RF (RMSE of 0.146), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (r-squared of 0.684).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings indicate that AI algorithms can predict obesity; however, further research is needed to assess their effectiveness in analyzing obesity-related data and examine most advanced AI methods. This review is a valuable resource for dietitians and researchers engaged in developing predictive models and intelligent clinical decision support systems using AI technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105804"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-enabled obesity prediction: A systematic review of cohort data analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori , Farid Najafi , Hajar Hasannejadasl , Soroush Heydari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Obesity, now the fifth leading global cause of death, has seen a dramatic rise in prevalence over the last forty years. It significantly increases the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Early identification of obesity risk allows for preventative actions against obesity-related factors. Despite the existence of AI-based predictive models, developing a comprehensive obesity screening tool requires extensive cohort data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A thorough review of 6,351 articles, focusing on AI predictions for obesity in cohort studies, was conducted up to March 2024 across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Using the JBI checklist, 10 studies involving 411,580 participants were critically appraised. These cohorts varied in length and size, with half lasting 1–5 years and involving less than 5,000 participants. The data types were categorized into nine groups, with demographic (7 studies) and biomarker data (4 studies) being the most frequently used. Machine learning was predominantly used (95 % of studies), mostly employing supervised learning techniques. Algorithms like random forest (RF) (18 %), linear regression (18 %), and stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) (14 %) were common. Top-performing models were noted for k-means (accuracy of 0.977), artificial neural networks (AUC of 0.99), GBM (specificity of 0.95 and sensitivity of 0.65), RF (RMSE of 0.146), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (r-squared of 0.684).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings indicate that AI algorithms can predict obesity; however, further research is needed to assess their effectiveness in analyzing obesity-related data and examine most advanced AI methods. This review is a valuable resource for dietitians and researchers engaged in developing predictive models and intelligent clinical decision support systems using AI technology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"196 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000218\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000218","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肥胖,现在是全球第五大死亡原因,在过去的四十年中发病率急剧上升。它会显著增加患2型糖尿病和心血管疾病等疾病的风险。对肥胖风险的早期识别有助于对肥胖相关因素采取预防措施。尽管存在基于人工智能的预测模型,但开发全面的肥胖筛查工具需要大量的队列数据。方法:截至2024年3月,对6,351篇文章进行了全面审查,重点关注队列研究中人工智能对肥胖的预测,涉及PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库。结果:使用JBI检查表,对涉及411,580名参与者的10项研究进行了批判性评估。这些队列的长度和规模各不相同,其中一半持续1-5年,参与者不到5000人。数据类型分为9组,其中最常用的是人口统计学(7项研究)和生物标志物数据(4项研究)。主要使用机器学习(95%的研究),主要采用监督学习技术。随机森林(RF)(18%)、线性回归(18%)和随机梯度增强(GBM)(14%)等算法是常见的。k-means(准确率为0.977)、人工神经网络(AUC为0.99)、GBM(特异性为0.95,灵敏度为0.65)、RF (RMSE为0.146)以及最小的绝对收缩和选择算子(r-squared为0.684)均获得了最佳表现。结论:研究结果表明,AI算法可以预测肥胖;然而,为了评估它们在分析肥胖相关数据和检验最先进的人工智能方法方面的有效性,还需要进一步的研究。这篇综述对于使用人工智能技术开发预测模型和智能临床决策支持系统的营养师和研究人员来说是一个宝贵的资源。
Artificial intelligence-enabled obesity prediction: A systematic review of cohort data analysis
Background
Obesity, now the fifth leading global cause of death, has seen a dramatic rise in prevalence over the last forty years. It significantly increases the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Early identification of obesity risk allows for preventative actions against obesity-related factors. Despite the existence of AI-based predictive models, developing a comprehensive obesity screening tool requires extensive cohort data.
Methods
A thorough review of 6,351 articles, focusing on AI predictions for obesity in cohort studies, was conducted up to March 2024 across databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Results
Using the JBI checklist, 10 studies involving 411,580 participants were critically appraised. These cohorts varied in length and size, with half lasting 1–5 years and involving less than 5,000 participants. The data types were categorized into nine groups, with demographic (7 studies) and biomarker data (4 studies) being the most frequently used. Machine learning was predominantly used (95 % of studies), mostly employing supervised learning techniques. Algorithms like random forest (RF) (18 %), linear regression (18 %), and stochastic gradient boosting (GBM) (14 %) were common. Top-performing models were noted for k-means (accuracy of 0.977), artificial neural networks (AUC of 0.99), GBM (specificity of 0.95 and sensitivity of 0.65), RF (RMSE of 0.146), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (r-squared of 0.684).
Conclusion
Findings indicate that AI algorithms can predict obesity; however, further research is needed to assess their effectiveness in analyzing obesity-related data and examine most advanced AI methods. This review is a valuable resource for dietitians and researchers engaged in developing predictive models and intelligent clinical decision support systems using AI technology.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings.
The scope of journal covers:
Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.;
Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc.
Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general;
Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.