使用高水平平衡任务确定社区居住老年人的楼梯下降表型。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s40520-025-02929-5
Takahiro Tanaka, Kimitaka Hase, Kimihiko Mori, Masanori Wakida, Yasuaki Arima, Takanari Kubo, Meguru Taguchi
{"title":"使用高水平平衡任务确定社区居住老年人的楼梯下降表型。","authors":"Takahiro Tanaka,&nbsp;Kimitaka Hase,&nbsp;Kimihiko Mori,&nbsp;Masanori Wakida,&nbsp;Yasuaki Arima,&nbsp;Takanari Kubo,&nbsp;Meguru Taguchi","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-02929-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Falls on stairs are a major cause of severe injuries among older adults, with stair descent posing significantly greater risks than ascent. Variations in stair descent phenotypes may reflect differences in physical function and biomechanical stability, and their identification may prevent falls.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aims to classify stair descent phenotypes in older adults and investigate the biomechanical and physical functional differences between these phenotypes using hierarchical cluster analysis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty-two older adults participated in this study. Stair descent was measured using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Physical function was assessed using measures of muscle strength, walking speed, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&amp;M).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on kinematic data obtained during stair descent. Three phenotypes were identified: neutral (N-type; 24%), extension (E-type; 52%), and rotation (R-type; 23%). There were no significant differences in lower limb muscle strength or walking speed among the different types, and TUG scores showed no differences in terms of mobility or balance abilities. However, CB&amp;M scores were significantly lower for E-type and R-type compared to N-type. Sub-analyses revealed that while there were no differences in the mobility factor of CB&amp;M between E-type and R-type, the strength factors were significantly lower compared to those for N-type.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>These results suggest that E-type and R-type stair-descent patterns may be influenced by declines in standing balance ability and muscle strength.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings may inform fall-prevention training programs related to stair descent among older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stair-descent phenotypes in community-dwelling older adults determined using high-level balance tasks\",\"authors\":\"Takahiro Tanaka,&nbsp;Kimitaka Hase,&nbsp;Kimihiko Mori,&nbsp;Masanori Wakida,&nbsp;Yasuaki Arima,&nbsp;Takanari Kubo,&nbsp;Meguru Taguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-02929-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Falls on stairs are a major cause of severe injuries among older adults, with stair descent posing significantly greater risks than ascent. Variations in stair descent phenotypes may reflect differences in physical function and biomechanical stability, and their identification may prevent falls.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aims to classify stair descent phenotypes in older adults and investigate the biomechanical and physical functional differences between these phenotypes using hierarchical cluster analysis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighty-two older adults participated in this study. Stair descent was measured using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Physical function was assessed using measures of muscle strength, walking speed, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&amp;M).</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on kinematic data obtained during stair descent. Three phenotypes were identified: neutral (N-type; 24%), extension (E-type; 52%), and rotation (R-type; 23%). There were no significant differences in lower limb muscle strength or walking speed among the different types, and TUG scores showed no differences in terms of mobility or balance abilities. However, CB&amp;M scores were significantly lower for E-type and R-type compared to N-type. Sub-analyses revealed that while there were no differences in the mobility factor of CB&amp;M between E-type and R-type, the strength factors were significantly lower compared to those for N-type.</p><h3>Discussion</h3><p>These results suggest that E-type and R-type stair-descent patterns may be influenced by declines in standing balance ability and muscle strength.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings may inform fall-prevention training programs related to stair descent among older adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779766/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-02929-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-02929-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人在楼梯上跌倒是严重伤害的主要原因,下楼梯的风险明显大于上楼梯的风险。楼梯下降表型的变化可能反映了物理功能和生物力学稳定性的差异,它们的识别可以防止跌倒。目的:本研究旨在对老年人楼梯下降表型进行分类,并利用分层聚类分析研究这些表型之间的生物力学和物理功能差异。方法:82名老年人参与本研究。楼梯下降用三维运动分析系统测量。身体功能通过肌肉力量、步行速度、定时起身和行走测试(TUG)和社区平衡和活动量表(CB&M)进行评估。结果:对楼梯下降过程中获得的运动学数据进行了层次聚类分析。鉴定出三种表型:中性(n型);24%),扩展(e型;52%),旋转(r型;23%)。不同类型患者的下肢肌肉力量和步行速度无显著差异,TUG评分在活动能力和平衡能力方面无显著差异。而e型和r型的CB&M得分明显低于n型。亚分析结果显示,e型与r型的CB&M迁移因子无显著差异,但强度因子显著低于n型。讨论:这些结果表明,e型和r型楼梯下降模式可能受到站立平衡能力和肌肉力量下降的影响。结论:这些发现可以为老年人楼梯下降相关的预防跌倒训练计划提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stair-descent phenotypes in community-dwelling older adults determined using high-level balance tasks

Background

Falls on stairs are a major cause of severe injuries among older adults, with stair descent posing significantly greater risks than ascent. Variations in stair descent phenotypes may reflect differences in physical function and biomechanical stability, and their identification may prevent falls.

Aims

This study aims to classify stair descent phenotypes in older adults and investigate the biomechanical and physical functional differences between these phenotypes using hierarchical cluster analysis.

Methods

Eighty-two older adults participated in this study. Stair descent was measured using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Physical function was assessed using measures of muscle strength, walking speed, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M).

Results

Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on kinematic data obtained during stair descent. Three phenotypes were identified: neutral (N-type; 24%), extension (E-type; 52%), and rotation (R-type; 23%). There were no significant differences in lower limb muscle strength or walking speed among the different types, and TUG scores showed no differences in terms of mobility or balance abilities. However, CB&M scores were significantly lower for E-type and R-type compared to N-type. Sub-analyses revealed that while there were no differences in the mobility factor of CB&M between E-type and R-type, the strength factors were significantly lower compared to those for N-type.

Discussion

These results suggest that E-type and R-type stair-descent patterns may be influenced by declines in standing balance ability and muscle strength.

Conclusions

These findings may inform fall-prevention training programs related to stair descent among older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Methodological concerns in the association between gut microbiota and sarcopenia: from cross‑sectional associations to statistical fragility. Food insecurity as a predictor of all-cause mortality and premature mortality among older adults: a longitudinal cohort analysis of ELSA study. Assessment of the "world guidelines for falls prevention and management" algorithm in older volunteers. Associations between pain and cognitive impairment in older adults: findings from the birjand longitudinal aging study. Angiogenic T cells and cognitive function in older adults with type 2 diabetes treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1