K.H. Kim , C. Park , S.-H. Beom , M.H. Kim , C.G. Kim , H.R. Kim , M. Jung , S.J. Shin , S.Y. Rha , H.S. Kim
{"title":"abemaciclib联合紫杉醇治疗CDK4/6通路基因组改变肿瘤的开放标签IB/II期研究","authors":"K.H. Kim , C. Park , S.-H. Beom , M.H. Kim , C.G. Kim , H.R. Kim , M. Jung , S.J. Shin , S.Y. Rha , H.S. Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Disruption of cyclin D-dependent kinases (CDKs), particularly <em>CDK4/6</em>, drives cancer cell proliferation via abnormal protein phosphorylation. This open-label, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial evaluated the efficacy of the <em>CDK4/6</em> inhibitor, abemaciclib, combined with paclitaxel against <em>CDK4/</em><em>6</em>-activated tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with <em>CDK4/6</em> pathway aberrations were included. Based on phase Ib, the recommended phase II doses were determined as abemaciclib 100 mg twice daily and paclitaxel 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 8, and 15, over 4-week-long cycles. The primary endpoint for phase II was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included the clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Tissue-based next-generation sequencing and exploratory circulating tumor DNA analyses were carried out.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between February 2021 and April 2022, 30 patients received abemaciclib/paclitaxel (median follow-up: 15.7 months), and 27 were included in the efficacy analysis. <em>CDK4/6</em> amplification (50%) and <em>CCND1/3</em> amplification (20%) were common activating mutations. The ORR was 7.4%, with two partial responses, and the CBR was 66.7% (18/27 patients). The median OS and PFS were 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-14.0 months] and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.6-4.3 months), respectively. Grade 3 adverse events (50%, 21 events) were mainly hematologic. Genetic analysis revealed a ‘poor genetic status’ subgroup characterized by mutations in key signaling pathways (RAS, Wnt, PI3K, and NOTCH) and/or <em>CCNE</em> amplification, correlating with poorer PFS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Abemaciclib and paclitaxel showed moderate clinical benefits for <em>CDK4/</em><em>6</em>-activated tumors. We identified a poor genetic group characterized by bypass signaling pathway activation and/or <em>CCNE</em> amplification, which negatively affected treatment response and survival. Future studies with homogeneous patient groups are required to validate these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 104106"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An open-label, phase IB/II study of abemaciclib with paclitaxel for tumors with CDK4/6 pathway genomic alterations\",\"authors\":\"K.H. Kim , C. Park , S.-H. Beom , M.H. Kim , C.G. Kim , H.R. Kim , M. Jung , S.J. Shin , S.Y. Rha , H.S. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Disruption of cyclin D-dependent kinases (CDKs), particularly <em>CDK4/6</em>, drives cancer cell proliferation via abnormal protein phosphorylation. This open-label, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial evaluated the efficacy of the <em>CDK4/6</em> inhibitor, abemaciclib, combined with paclitaxel against <em>CDK4/</em><em>6</em>-activated tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with <em>CDK4/6</em> pathway aberrations were included. Based on phase Ib, the recommended phase II doses were determined as abemaciclib 100 mg twice daily and paclitaxel 70 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1, 8, and 15, over 4-week-long cycles. The primary endpoint for phase II was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included the clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Tissue-based next-generation sequencing and exploratory circulating tumor DNA analyses were carried out.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between February 2021 and April 2022, 30 patients received abemaciclib/paclitaxel (median follow-up: 15.7 months), and 27 were included in the efficacy analysis. <em>CDK4/6</em> amplification (50%) and <em>CCND1/3</em> amplification (20%) were common activating mutations. The ORR was 7.4%, with two partial responses, and the CBR was 66.7% (18/27 patients). The median OS and PFS were 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-14.0 months] and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.6-4.3 months), respectively. Grade 3 adverse events (50%, 21 events) were mainly hematologic. Genetic analysis revealed a ‘poor genetic status’ subgroup characterized by mutations in key signaling pathways (RAS, Wnt, PI3K, and NOTCH) and/or <em>CCNE</em> amplification, correlating with poorer PFS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Abemaciclib and paclitaxel showed moderate clinical benefits for <em>CDK4/</em><em>6</em>-activated tumors. We identified a poor genetic group characterized by bypass signaling pathway activation and/or <em>CCNE</em> amplification, which negatively affected treatment response and survival. Future studies with homogeneous patient groups are required to validate these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Open\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 104106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702924018775\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702924018775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:细胞周期蛋白d依赖性激酶(CDKs)的破坏,特别是CDK4/6,通过异常蛋白磷酸化驱动癌细胞增殖。这项开放标签、单臂、Ib/II期试验评估了CDK4/6抑制剂abemaciclib联合紫杉醇治疗CDK4/6活化肿瘤的疗效。患者和方法:纳入伴有CDK4/6通路畸变的局部晚期或转移性实体瘤患者。基于Ib期,推荐的II期剂量确定为abemaciclib 100 mg,每日2次,紫杉醇70 mg/m2,第1、8和15天,周期为4周。II期的主要终点是总缓解率(ORR)。次要终点包括临床获益率(CBR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。进行了基于组织的下一代测序和探索性循环肿瘤DNA分析。结果:2021年2月至2022年4月,30例患者接受了阿贝马昔lib/紫杉醇治疗(中位随访时间:15.7个月),其中27例纳入疗效分析。常见的激活突变为CDK4/6扩增(50%)和CCND1/3扩增(20%)。ORR为7.4%,有2例部分缓解,CBR为66.7%(18/27例)。中位OS和PFS分别为9.9个月(95%置信区间(CI) 5.7-14.0个月)和3.5个月(95% CI 2.6-4.3个月)。3级不良事件(50%,21例)主要发生在血液学方面。遗传分析显示,以关键信号通路(RAS、Wnt、PI3K和NOTCH)突变和/或CCNE扩增为特征的“不良遗传状态”亚组与较差的PFS相关。结论:Abemaciclib联合紫杉醇治疗cdk4 /6活化肿瘤临床获益中等。我们确定了一个以旁路信号通路激活和/或CCNE扩增为特征的不良遗传群体,这对治疗反应和生存产生了负面影响。需要对同质患者群体进行进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
An open-label, phase IB/II study of abemaciclib with paclitaxel for tumors with CDK4/6 pathway genomic alterations
Background
Disruption of cyclin D-dependent kinases (CDKs), particularly CDK4/6, drives cancer cell proliferation via abnormal protein phosphorylation. This open-label, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial evaluated the efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, combined with paclitaxel against CDK4/6-activated tumors.
Patients and methods
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors with CDK4/6 pathway aberrations were included. Based on phase Ib, the recommended phase II doses were determined as abemaciclib 100 mg twice daily and paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, over 4-week-long cycles. The primary endpoint for phase II was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included the clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Tissue-based next-generation sequencing and exploratory circulating tumor DNA analyses were carried out.
Results
Between February 2021 and April 2022, 30 patients received abemaciclib/paclitaxel (median follow-up: 15.7 months), and 27 were included in the efficacy analysis. CDK4/6 amplification (50%) and CCND1/3 amplification (20%) were common activating mutations. The ORR was 7.4%, with two partial responses, and the CBR was 66.7% (18/27 patients). The median OS and PFS were 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7-14.0 months] and 3.5 months (95% CI 2.6-4.3 months), respectively. Grade 3 adverse events (50%, 21 events) were mainly hematologic. Genetic analysis revealed a ‘poor genetic status’ subgroup characterized by mutations in key signaling pathways (RAS, Wnt, PI3K, and NOTCH) and/or CCNE amplification, correlating with poorer PFS.
Conclusion
Abemaciclib and paclitaxel showed moderate clinical benefits for CDK4/6-activated tumors. We identified a poor genetic group characterized by bypass signaling pathway activation and/or CCNE amplification, which negatively affected treatment response and survival. Future studies with homogeneous patient groups are required to validate these findings.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.