克服静脉切除胰切除术的技术挑战:哪些因素决定生存?

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Ejso Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109629
Elena B. Rangelova , Poya Ghorbani , Roberto Valente , Kimitaka Tanaka , Asif Halimi , Urban Arnelo , Ralf Segersvärd , Ernesto Sparrelid , Marco Del Chiaro
{"title":"克服静脉切除胰切除术的技术挑战:哪些因素决定生存?","authors":"Elena B. Rangelova ,&nbsp;Poya Ghorbani ,&nbsp;Roberto Valente ,&nbsp;Kimitaka Tanaka ,&nbsp;Asif Halimi ,&nbsp;Urban Arnelo ,&nbsp;Ralf Segersvärd ,&nbsp;Ernesto Sparrelid ,&nbsp;Marco Del Chiaro","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatectomy with venous resection (PVR) is nowadays considered standard. However, there is still concern about increased postoperative morbidity and impaired long-term outcome depending on the type of venous resection and reconstruction. The aim was to investigate the predictors of morbidity and long-term survival in patients undergoing PVR in a high-volume center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients undergoing PVR at a single center between January 2008 and January 2019 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Factors associated with postoperative complications and long-term survival were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 290 patients with isolated PVRs, 188 (65 %) were performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Surgical complications developed in 56 % of patients (n = 163), and 11 % (n = 36) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo&gt;3a). The 90-day mortality was 4.1 %. Venous thrombosis occurred in 4.8 % (n = 14), resulting in one mortality (0.3 %). No technical factors were predictive for the development of severe complications. Longer vein segments &gt;3 cm could be resected with similar short- and long-term outcome as shorter segments. The survival of patients undergoing PVR for resectable, borderline and locally advanced PDAC was similar (median of 18, 14, and 23 months, p = 0.7). On multivariate analysis, elevated CA19-9&gt;200 U/mL and ASA score≥3 were independent predictors of survival (p = 0.02), but not resectability at diagnosis nor type of venous reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The type of venous resection/reconstruction does not influence outcome and should be tailored according to patients' and tumors’ characteristics during PVR. The long-term survival after PVR for PDAC is influenced by tumor-and patient-related characteristics, and not technical vascular-resection associated factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 8","pages":"Article 109629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming the technical challenge of venous resection with pancreatectomy: Which factors determine survival?\",\"authors\":\"Elena B. Rangelova ,&nbsp;Poya Ghorbani ,&nbsp;Roberto Valente ,&nbsp;Kimitaka Tanaka ,&nbsp;Asif Halimi ,&nbsp;Urban Arnelo ,&nbsp;Ralf Segersvärd ,&nbsp;Ernesto Sparrelid ,&nbsp;Marco Del Chiaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pancreatectomy with venous resection (PVR) is nowadays considered standard. However, there is still concern about increased postoperative morbidity and impaired long-term outcome depending on the type of venous resection and reconstruction. The aim was to investigate the predictors of morbidity and long-term survival in patients undergoing PVR in a high-volume center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All consecutive patients undergoing PVR at a single center between January 2008 and January 2019 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Factors associated with postoperative complications and long-term survival were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 290 patients with isolated PVRs, 188 (65 %) were performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Surgical complications developed in 56 % of patients (n = 163), and 11 % (n = 36) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo&gt;3a). The 90-day mortality was 4.1 %. Venous thrombosis occurred in 4.8 % (n = 14), resulting in one mortality (0.3 %). No technical factors were predictive for the development of severe complications. Longer vein segments &gt;3 cm could be resected with similar short- and long-term outcome as shorter segments. The survival of patients undergoing PVR for resectable, borderline and locally advanced PDAC was similar (median of 18, 14, and 23 months, p = 0.7). On multivariate analysis, elevated CA19-9&gt;200 U/mL and ASA score≥3 were independent predictors of survival (p = 0.02), but not resectability at diagnosis nor type of venous reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The type of venous resection/reconstruction does not influence outcome and should be tailored according to patients' and tumors’ characteristics during PVR. The long-term survival after PVR for PDAC is influenced by tumor-and patient-related characteristics, and not technical vascular-resection associated factors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 8\",\"pages\":\"Article 109629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325000575\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325000575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胰切除术加静脉切除术(PVR)目前被认为是标准的。然而,根据静脉切除和重建的类型,仍然存在术后发病率增加和长期预后受损的担忧。目的是研究在大容量中心进行PVR患者的发病率和长期生存的预测因素。方法:从一个前瞻性维护的数据库中检索2008年1月至2019年1月在单一中心连续接受PVR的所有患者。分析术后并发症及远期生存率的相关因素。结果:在290例分离性PVRs患者中,188例(65%)因胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)接受了手术。56%的患者(n = 163)出现手术并发症,11% (n = 36)出现严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo>3a)。90天死亡率为4.1%。静脉血栓形成发生率为4.8% (n = 14),导致1例死亡(0.3%)。没有技术因素可以预测严重并发症的发生。较长的静脉段> ~ 3cm可以切除,短期和长期结果与较短的静脉段相似。可切除、交界期和局部晚期PDAC患者接受PVR的生存期相似(中位为18、14和23个月,p = 0.7)。在多因素分析中,CA19-9升高200 U/mL和ASA评分≥3是生存的独立预测因素(p = 0.02),但在诊断时可切除性和静脉重建类型方面没有影响。结论:静脉切除/重建的类型不影响预后,在PVR中应根据患者和肿瘤的特点量身定制。PDAC的PVR后的长期生存受肿瘤和患者相关特征的影响,而不是技术性的血管切除术相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overcoming the technical challenge of venous resection with pancreatectomy: Which factors determine survival?

Background

Pancreatectomy with venous resection (PVR) is nowadays considered standard. However, there is still concern about increased postoperative morbidity and impaired long-term outcome depending on the type of venous resection and reconstruction. The aim was to investigate the predictors of morbidity and long-term survival in patients undergoing PVR in a high-volume center.

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing PVR at a single center between January 2008 and January 2019 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Factors associated with postoperative complications and long-term survival were analyzed.

Results

Of 290 patients with isolated PVRs, 188 (65 %) were performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Surgical complications developed in 56 % of patients (n = 163), and 11 % (n = 36) had severe complications (Clavien-Dindo>3a). The 90-day mortality was 4.1 %. Venous thrombosis occurred in 4.8 % (n = 14), resulting in one mortality (0.3 %). No technical factors were predictive for the development of severe complications. Longer vein segments >3 cm could be resected with similar short- and long-term outcome as shorter segments. The survival of patients undergoing PVR for resectable, borderline and locally advanced PDAC was similar (median of 18, 14, and 23 months, p = 0.7). On multivariate analysis, elevated CA19-9>200 U/mL and ASA score≥3 were independent predictors of survival (p = 0.02), but not resectability at diagnosis nor type of venous reconstruction.

Conclusion

The type of venous resection/reconstruction does not influence outcome and should be tailored according to patients' and tumors’ characteristics during PVR. The long-term survival after PVR for PDAC is influenced by tumor-and patient-related characteristics, and not technical vascular-resection associated factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Diffusion-weighted MRI and apparent diffusion coefficient in head and neck malignancies: practical utility for diagnosis, triage and post-treatment surveillance Usefulness of routine clinical follow-up after oral cavity cancer treatment: a single-center retrospective study Trends in surgical outcomes for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Insights from a Western tertiary center Capsulectomy for chronic encapsulated seroma after breast cancer surgery: prone to complications and limited efficacy Preoperative MRI features for predicting response to postoperative adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1