Luigi A De Vitis, Gabriella Schivardi, Susanna Delfrati, Benedetta Biffi, Anna Viscardi, Marina Rosanu, Lucia Ribero, Giuseppe Caruso, Alessandra Rappa, Laura Marinucci, Riccardo Adorisio, Vanna Zanagnolo, Giovanni D Aletti, Massimo Barberis, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Fedro A Peccatori, Ailyn Vidal Urbinati, Ida Pino, Dorella Franchi, Ilaria Betella, Nicoletta Colombo, Francesco Multinu
{"title":"分子分类对子宫内膜癌保留生育能力治疗的预后影响。","authors":"Luigi A De Vitis, Gabriella Schivardi, Susanna Delfrati, Benedetta Biffi, Anna Viscardi, Marina Rosanu, Lucia Ribero, Giuseppe Caruso, Alessandra Rappa, Laura Marinucci, Riccardo Adorisio, Vanna Zanagnolo, Giovanni D Aletti, Massimo Barberis, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Fedro A Peccatori, Ailyn Vidal Urbinati, Ida Pino, Dorella Franchi, Ilaria Betella, Nicoletta Colombo, Francesco Multinu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Polymerase epsilon (POLE), TP53/p53, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were assessed to assign patients to molecular groups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, stable disease, or progressive. Response at 6 months, best response, and recurrence after complete response were evaluated by molecular class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 33 patients were assigned to a molecular class and included in the analysis. Molecular testing detected 3 POLEmut (9%), 3 MMRd (9%), 25 NSMP (76%), and 2 p53abn (6%); 0 of 3 POLEmut (0%), 0 of 3 MMRd (0%), 6 of 25 NSMP (24%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) achieved complete response within 6 months. In terms of best response during the entire treatment period, 2 of 3 POLEmut (67%), 2 of 3 MMRd (67%), 18 of 25 NSMP (72%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) showed complete response. After complete response was achieved, 1 of 2 POLEmut (50%), 2 of 2 MMRd (100%), 14 of 18 NSMP (78%), and 0 of 1 p53abn (0%) had a recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the small number of patients limits our findings, a lower proportion of MMRd responded to progestins than of NSMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":"35 1","pages":"100024"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prognostic impact of molecular classification in endometrial cancer that undergoes fertility-sparing treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Luigi A De Vitis, Gabriella Schivardi, Susanna Delfrati, Benedetta Biffi, Anna Viscardi, Marina Rosanu, Lucia Ribero, Giuseppe Caruso, Alessandra Rappa, Laura Marinucci, Riccardo Adorisio, Vanna Zanagnolo, Giovanni D Aletti, Massimo Barberis, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Fedro A Peccatori, Ailyn Vidal Urbinati, Ida Pino, Dorella Franchi, Ilaria Betella, Nicoletta Colombo, Francesco Multinu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Polymerase epsilon (POLE), TP53/p53, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were assessed to assign patients to molecular groups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, stable disease, or progressive. Response at 6 months, best response, and recurrence after complete response were evaluated by molecular class.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 33 patients were assigned to a molecular class and included in the analysis. Molecular testing detected 3 POLEmut (9%), 3 MMRd (9%), 25 NSMP (76%), and 2 p53abn (6%); 0 of 3 POLEmut (0%), 0 of 3 MMRd (0%), 6 of 25 NSMP (24%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) achieved complete response within 6 months. In terms of best response during the entire treatment period, 2 of 3 POLEmut (67%), 2 of 3 MMRd (67%), 18 of 25 NSMP (72%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) showed complete response. After complete response was achieved, 1 of 2 POLEmut (50%), 2 of 2 MMRd (100%), 14 of 18 NSMP (78%), and 0 of 1 p53abn (0%) had a recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the small number of patients limits our findings, a lower proportion of MMRd responded to progestins than of NSMP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"100024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The prognostic impact of molecular classification in endometrial cancer that undergoes fertility-sparing treatment.
Objective: No biomarkers are available to predict treatment response in patients with endometrial cancers who undergo fertility-sparing treatment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of molecular classification.
Methods: Patients with endometrial cancer who underwent fertility-sparing treatment with progestins between 2005 and 2021 were retrospectively identified. Polymerase epsilon (POLE), TP53/p53, and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were assessed to assign patients to molecular groups: POLE mutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), no specific molecular profile (NSMP), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). Treatment response was classified as complete, partial, stable disease, or progressive. Response at 6 months, best response, and recurrence after complete response were evaluated by molecular class.
Results: In total, 33 patients were assigned to a molecular class and included in the analysis. Molecular testing detected 3 POLEmut (9%), 3 MMRd (9%), 25 NSMP (76%), and 2 p53abn (6%); 0 of 3 POLEmut (0%), 0 of 3 MMRd (0%), 6 of 25 NSMP (24%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) achieved complete response within 6 months. In terms of best response during the entire treatment period, 2 of 3 POLEmut (67%), 2 of 3 MMRd (67%), 18 of 25 NSMP (72%), and 1 of 2 p53abn (50%) showed complete response. After complete response was achieved, 1 of 2 POLEmut (50%), 2 of 2 MMRd (100%), 14 of 18 NSMP (78%), and 0 of 1 p53abn (0%) had a recurrence.
Conclusion: Although the small number of patients limits our findings, a lower proportion of MMRd responded to progestins than of NSMP.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.