利用LCMSMS研究辣椒中选定杀虫剂的耗散动力学和持续毒性。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-86724-2
Sivasankari Sivakumar, Suganthi Angappan, Elaiyabharathi Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam Pagalahalli Sankaran, Renukadevi Perumal, Veeranan Arun Giridhari Veeranan, Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Kiruthika Kanagaraj, Mohammad Ikram
{"title":"利用LCMSMS研究辣椒中选定杀虫剂的耗散动力学和持续毒性。","authors":"Sivasankari Sivakumar, Suganthi Angappan, Elaiyabharathi Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam Pagalahalli Sankaran, Renukadevi Perumal, Veeranan Arun Giridhari Veeranan, Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Kiruthika Kanagaraj, Mohammad Ikram","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-86724-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chilli, a globally cultivated and consumed crop is significantly impacted by Thrips parvispinus. The reliance on pesticides could result in residue contamination, adversely affecting quality, leading to export rejections and health risks to consumers. This study evaluated the bioefficacy and persistent toxicity of fipronil and tolfenpyrad against thrips in chilli, and persistence of their residues. Tolfenpyrad demonstrated higher field efficacy (60.94 to 78.53%) against thrips compared to fipronil (37.61 to 58.07%). Residue analysis was performed in leaves and green chilli fruits using LC-MS/MS. Fipronil's efficacy decreased after 5 to 7 days of application, but both fipronil and tolfenpyrad residues remained for 20 and 30 days, respectively. In contrast, the residues in leaves caused persistent toxicity to thrips, causing about 50% mortality until 10 to 15 days in tolfenpyrad treatment. In green chilli, residues of tolfenpyrad and fipronil persisted for up to 40 and 25 days, necessitating pre-harvest intervals of 3.17 and 19.39 to 30.65 days, respectively, but with no dietary risk to consumers. Tolfenpyrad exhibited superior efficacy against T. parvispinus compared to fipronil, with a longer duration of effectiveness in leaves and quicker residue dissipation in chilli fruits and a short pre-harvest interval, supporting its use in Integrated Pest Management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of dissipation dynamics and persistent toxicity of selected insecticides in chilli using LCMSMS.\",\"authors\":\"Sivasankari Sivakumar, Suganthi Angappan, Elaiyabharathi Thiyagarajan, Shanmugam Pagalahalli Sankaran, Renukadevi Perumal, Veeranan Arun Giridhari Veeranan, Bimal Kumar Sahoo, Kiruthika Kanagaraj, Mohammad Ikram\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-86724-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chilli, a globally cultivated and consumed crop is significantly impacted by Thrips parvispinus. The reliance on pesticides could result in residue contamination, adversely affecting quality, leading to export rejections and health risks to consumers. This study evaluated the bioefficacy and persistent toxicity of fipronil and tolfenpyrad against thrips in chilli, and persistence of their residues. Tolfenpyrad demonstrated higher field efficacy (60.94 to 78.53%) against thrips compared to fipronil (37.61 to 58.07%). Residue analysis was performed in leaves and green chilli fruits using LC-MS/MS. Fipronil's efficacy decreased after 5 to 7 days of application, but both fipronil and tolfenpyrad residues remained for 20 and 30 days, respectively. In contrast, the residues in leaves caused persistent toxicity to thrips, causing about 50% mortality until 10 to 15 days in tolfenpyrad treatment. In green chilli, residues of tolfenpyrad and fipronil persisted for up to 40 and 25 days, necessitating pre-harvest intervals of 3.17 and 19.39 to 30.65 days, respectively, but with no dietary risk to consumers. Tolfenpyrad exhibited superior efficacy against T. parvispinus compared to fipronil, with a longer duration of effectiveness in leaves and quicker residue dissipation in chilli fruits and a short pre-harvest interval, supporting its use in Integrated Pest Management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86724-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86724-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

辣椒是一种全球种植和消费的作物,受到了小蓟马的严重影响。对农药的依赖可能导致残留污染,对质量产生不利影响,导致出口被拒,并给消费者带来健康风险。本研究评价了氟虫腈和苯虫吡酯对辣椒蓟马的生物药效和持续毒性,以及其残留的持久性。氟虫腈对蓟马的田间药效(60.94 ~ 78.53%)高于氟虫腈(37.61 ~ 58.07%)。采用LC-MS/MS对青椒叶片和青椒果实进行残留分析。氟虫腈在施用5 ~ 7天后药效下降,但氟虫腈和苯虫吡酯的残留时间分别为20天和30天。相反,叶片中的残留对蓟马的毒性持续存在,致死约50%,直至10至15天。在绿辣椒中,苯氰菊酯和氟虫腈的残留可持续40天和25天,需要分别在收获前间隔3.17天和19.39至30.65天,但对消费者没有饮食风险。与氟虫腈相比,甲苯吡虫啉对小蠹蛾的防治效果更佳,其在辣椒叶片中的有效持续时间更长,在辣椒果实中残留消散更快,收获前间隔更短,支持其在害虫综合治理中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study of dissipation dynamics and persistent toxicity of selected insecticides in chilli using LCMSMS.

Chilli, a globally cultivated and consumed crop is significantly impacted by Thrips parvispinus. The reliance on pesticides could result in residue contamination, adversely affecting quality, leading to export rejections and health risks to consumers. This study evaluated the bioefficacy and persistent toxicity of fipronil and tolfenpyrad against thrips in chilli, and persistence of their residues. Tolfenpyrad demonstrated higher field efficacy (60.94 to 78.53%) against thrips compared to fipronil (37.61 to 58.07%). Residue analysis was performed in leaves and green chilli fruits using LC-MS/MS. Fipronil's efficacy decreased after 5 to 7 days of application, but both fipronil and tolfenpyrad residues remained for 20 and 30 days, respectively. In contrast, the residues in leaves caused persistent toxicity to thrips, causing about 50% mortality until 10 to 15 days in tolfenpyrad treatment. In green chilli, residues of tolfenpyrad and fipronil persisted for up to 40 and 25 days, necessitating pre-harvest intervals of 3.17 and 19.39 to 30.65 days, respectively, but with no dietary risk to consumers. Tolfenpyrad exhibited superior efficacy against T. parvispinus compared to fipronil, with a longer duration of effectiveness in leaves and quicker residue dissipation in chilli fruits and a short pre-harvest interval, supporting its use in Integrated Pest Management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
期刊最新文献
Secure color image encryption using a fractional-order chaotic PRNG and DNA-level operations. Fixed-point topology meets fractal memory: a Kutumba-stabilized framework for nonlocal fractal-fractional dynamics. Barrier Lyapunov function-based robust adaptive neural network control with dynamically adjusted activation functions for Euler-Lagrange systems under position constraints. Bi-analyte demonstration of non-resonant, single-molecule SERS with isolated lithographic enhancement structures. Index-based FT-IR assessment of chrysotile detectability and environmental durability in asbestos cement materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1