制定和验证用于评估美国社会经济差异的县剥夺指数:对公共卫生结果和缓解战略的影响。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.002
W.D. Irish , A.E. Burch , A. Landry , M.D. Honaker , J. Wong
{"title":"制定和验证用于评估美国社会经济差异的县剥夺指数:对公共卫生结果和缓解战略的影响。","authors":"W.D. Irish ,&nbsp;A.E. Burch ,&nbsp;A. Landry ,&nbsp;M.D. Honaker ,&nbsp;J. Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and validate a county deprivation index (CDI) that assesses socio-economic disparities and their impact on health outcomes at the county level.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A retrospective, cross-sectional study using publicly available county-level data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group 18 county-level socio-economic indicators into three clusters: economic well-being and technical connectivity, socio-economic disadvantage and vulnerability, and housing affordability and quality of life. The CDI was derived from model coefficients and validated by comparing its performance to established county deprivation measures, including the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and the Multidimensional Deprivation Index (MDI), in predicting disease-specific mortality rates. We also assessed the CDI's ability to explain variability in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) county health scores across eight randomly selected states.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 3107 counties from the contiguous US. The CDI explained 45 % of the variance in age-adjusted avoidable heart disease and stroke death rates, 20 % in cancer mortality rates, 19 % in lung cancer mortality rates, and 52 % in all-cause mortality rates, outperforming the SDI and MDI. It also accounted for 63–91 % of the variance in RWJF health outcome and factor scores across selected states.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CDI demonstrates superior predictive accuracy compared to existing indices, making it a valuable tool for identifying health disparities and guiding targeted public health interventions. Regular updates of the CDI will be necessary to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in capturing evolving socio-economic conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 56-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a county deprivation index for assessing socio-economic disparities in the United States: Implications for public health outcomes and mitigation strategies\",\"authors\":\"W.D. Irish ,&nbsp;A.E. Burch ,&nbsp;A. Landry ,&nbsp;M.D. Honaker ,&nbsp;J. Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and validate a county deprivation index (CDI) that assesses socio-economic disparities and their impact on health outcomes at the county level.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A retrospective, cross-sectional study using publicly available county-level data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group 18 county-level socio-economic indicators into three clusters: economic well-being and technical connectivity, socio-economic disadvantage and vulnerability, and housing affordability and quality of life. The CDI was derived from model coefficients and validated by comparing its performance to established county deprivation measures, including the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and the Multidimensional Deprivation Index (MDI), in predicting disease-specific mortality rates. We also assessed the CDI's ability to explain variability in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) county health scores across eight randomly selected states.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis included 3107 counties from the contiguous US. The CDI explained 45 % of the variance in age-adjusted avoidable heart disease and stroke death rates, 20 % in cancer mortality rates, 19 % in lung cancer mortality rates, and 52 % in all-cause mortality rates, outperforming the SDI and MDI. It also accounted for 63–91 % of the variance in RWJF health outcome and factor scores across selected states.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The CDI demonstrates superior predictive accuracy compared to existing indices, making it a valuable tool for identifying health disparities and guiding targeted public health interventions. Regular updates of the CDI will be necessary to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in capturing evolving socio-economic conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 56-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000149\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625000149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发和验证县剥夺指数(CDI),以评估县一级的社会经济差异及其对健康结果的影响。研究设计:采用公开的县级数据进行回顾性、横断面研究。方法:采用分层聚类分析方法,将18个县级社会经济指标分为3类:经济福祉和技术连通性、社会经济劣势和脆弱性、住房负担能力和生活质量。CDI是从模型系数中得出的,并通过将其与既定的县剥夺措施(包括社会剥夺指数(SDI)和多维剥夺指数(MDI))在预测特定疾病死亡率方面的表现进行比较来验证。我们还评估了CDI解释罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会(RWJF)在8个随机选择的州的县健康得分变异性的能力。结果:该分析包括来自美国连续的3107个县。CDI解释了年龄调整后可避免的心脏病和中风死亡率差异的45%,癌症死亡率差异的20%,肺癌死亡率差异的19%,全因死亡率差异的52%,优于SDI和MDI。在选定的州中,它也占了RWJF健康结果和因素得分差异的63- 91%。结论:与现有指标相比,CDI具有更高的预测准确性,使其成为识别健康差异和指导有针对性的公共卫生干预的宝贵工具。必须定期更新国别发展指标,以保持其在反映不断变化的社会经济状况方面的相关性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a county deprivation index for assessing socio-economic disparities in the United States: Implications for public health outcomes and mitigation strategies

Objective

To develop and validate a county deprivation index (CDI) that assesses socio-economic disparities and their impact on health outcomes at the county level.

Study design

A retrospective, cross-sectional study using publicly available county-level data.

Methods

Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group 18 county-level socio-economic indicators into three clusters: economic well-being and technical connectivity, socio-economic disadvantage and vulnerability, and housing affordability and quality of life. The CDI was derived from model coefficients and validated by comparing its performance to established county deprivation measures, including the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) and the Multidimensional Deprivation Index (MDI), in predicting disease-specific mortality rates. We also assessed the CDI's ability to explain variability in Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) county health scores across eight randomly selected states.

Results

The analysis included 3107 counties from the contiguous US. The CDI explained 45 % of the variance in age-adjusted avoidable heart disease and stroke death rates, 20 % in cancer mortality rates, 19 % in lung cancer mortality rates, and 52 % in all-cause mortality rates, outperforming the SDI and MDI. It also accounted for 63–91 % of the variance in RWJF health outcome and factor scores across selected states.

Conclusions

The CDI demonstrates superior predictive accuracy compared to existing indices, making it a valuable tool for identifying health disparities and guiding targeted public health interventions. Regular updates of the CDI will be necessary to maintain its relevance and effectiveness in capturing evolving socio-economic conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Acute symptoms and subsequent post-acute symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination: A Danish population-based study Economic burden estimation to inform prevention policies against emerging zoonotic diseases: The case of tick-borne encephalitis in France Drivers of respiratory infection landscapes in the post-pandemic era - The interplay of age, seasonality, and inter-annual variability in pathogen distribution: A retrospective surveillance study The conceptualisation and operationalisation of nature in health professional education: A scoping review Poverty, demand, and coping: A longitudinal investigation on the impact of public leisure facilities on the health of rural elderly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1