Susan Kilroy , Beth Marks , Kathryn M. Sawyer , Kathryn Vanderzwan , Christopher Karczmar , Mike Koronkowski , Blase P. Brown
{"title":"利用模拟强化的跨专业教育来识别卫生保健学生合作实践行为的差异:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Susan Kilroy , Beth Marks , Kathryn M. Sawyer , Kathryn Vanderzwan , Christopher Karczmar , Mike Koronkowski , Blase P. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Teaching collaborative practice behaviors (CPBs) to interprofessional healthcare students could improve healthcare for underserved populations.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explained the impact of Simulation Enhanced Interprofessional Education (SIM-IPE) on healthcare students' self-reported CPBs and their perceptions of utilizing CPBs when caring for underserved populations, as well as the differences among professions within interprofessional teams.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Mixed methods explanatory design.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Sixty-Eight doctorate of nurse practitioner, dental and pharmacy students from a large research-intensive university in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self Efficacy Tool (IPECC-SET27) was used to collect quantitative data. Qualitative data was collected through recorded simulation debriefing sessions. One hundred and thirty-six quantitative surveys were collected, and 214 qualitative responses were reviewed from the 48 simulations and recorded debriefing sessions. Paired <em>t-</em>tests and directed content analysis were used to infer the quantitative and qualitative impact of SIM-IPE on all students in an interprofessional team and differences among each profession.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After SIM-IPE, all students showed statistically significant increases in mean CPB scores for all 27 items (<em>ρ</em> < 0.0001) for IPECC-SET 27. Students perceived their CPBs when caring for underserved individuals improved most in <em>Teams and Teamwork</em> item one (48 %, n = 103). Comparing individual professions and CPB skills; Values and ethics (14 %, n = 8) for pharmacy, roles, and RESPONSIBILITIES (28 %, n = 24) and Communication (32 % n = 27) for dentistry, and teams and teamwork (61 % n = 43) for nurse practitioner had the greatest impact and were most frequently reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significantly increased mean scores in competence for CPBs was demonstrated. CPB differences were evident among professions. Educators must understand professional CPB differences and develop SIM - IPE that promotes development of collaborative practice-ready healthcare professionals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106569"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing simulation-enhanced interprofessional education to identify differences in healthcare students' collaborative practice behaviors: A mixed method study\",\"authors\":\"Susan Kilroy , Beth Marks , Kathryn M. Sawyer , Kathryn Vanderzwan , Christopher Karczmar , Mike Koronkowski , Blase P. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Teaching collaborative practice behaviors (CPBs) to interprofessional healthcare students could improve healthcare for underserved populations.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explained the impact of Simulation Enhanced Interprofessional Education (SIM-IPE) on healthcare students' self-reported CPBs and their perceptions of utilizing CPBs when caring for underserved populations, as well as the differences among professions within interprofessional teams.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Mixed methods explanatory design.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Sixty-Eight doctorate of nurse practitioner, dental and pharmacy students from a large research-intensive university in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self Efficacy Tool (IPECC-SET27) was used to collect quantitative data. Qualitative data was collected through recorded simulation debriefing sessions. One hundred and thirty-six quantitative surveys were collected, and 214 qualitative responses were reviewed from the 48 simulations and recorded debriefing sessions. Paired <em>t-</em>tests and directed content analysis were used to infer the quantitative and qualitative impact of SIM-IPE on all students in an interprofessional team and differences among each profession.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After SIM-IPE, all students showed statistically significant increases in mean CPB scores for all 27 items (<em>ρ</em> < 0.0001) for IPECC-SET 27. Students perceived their CPBs when caring for underserved individuals improved most in <em>Teams and Teamwork</em> item one (48 %, n = 103). Comparing individual professions and CPB skills; Values and ethics (14 %, n = 8) for pharmacy, roles, and RESPONSIBILITIES (28 %, n = 24) and Communication (32 % n = 27) for dentistry, and teams and teamwork (61 % n = 43) for nurse practitioner had the greatest impact and were most frequently reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Significantly increased mean scores in competence for CPBs was demonstrated. CPB differences were evident among professions. Educators must understand professional CPB differences and develop SIM - IPE that promotes development of collaborative practice-ready healthcare professionals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106569\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilizing simulation-enhanced interprofessional education to identify differences in healthcare students' collaborative practice behaviors: A mixed method study
Background
Teaching collaborative practice behaviors (CPBs) to interprofessional healthcare students could improve healthcare for underserved populations.
Objective
This study explained the impact of Simulation Enhanced Interprofessional Education (SIM-IPE) on healthcare students' self-reported CPBs and their perceptions of utilizing CPBs when caring for underserved populations, as well as the differences among professions within interprofessional teams.
Design
Mixed methods explanatory design.
Participants and setting
Sixty-Eight doctorate of nurse practitioner, dental and pharmacy students from a large research-intensive university in the United States.
Methods
The Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competency Self Efficacy Tool (IPECC-SET27) was used to collect quantitative data. Qualitative data was collected through recorded simulation debriefing sessions. One hundred and thirty-six quantitative surveys were collected, and 214 qualitative responses were reviewed from the 48 simulations and recorded debriefing sessions. Paired t-tests and directed content analysis were used to infer the quantitative and qualitative impact of SIM-IPE on all students in an interprofessional team and differences among each profession.
Results
After SIM-IPE, all students showed statistically significant increases in mean CPB scores for all 27 items (ρ < 0.0001) for IPECC-SET 27. Students perceived their CPBs when caring for underserved individuals improved most in Teams and Teamwork item one (48 %, n = 103). Comparing individual professions and CPB skills; Values and ethics (14 %, n = 8) for pharmacy, roles, and RESPONSIBILITIES (28 %, n = 24) and Communication (32 % n = 27) for dentistry, and teams and teamwork (61 % n = 43) for nurse practitioner had the greatest impact and were most frequently reported.
Conclusions
Significantly increased mean scores in competence for CPBs was demonstrated. CPB differences were evident among professions. Educators must understand professional CPB differences and develop SIM - IPE that promotes development of collaborative practice-ready healthcare professionals.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education.
The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives.
Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.