小梁切除术泡内反射率和形态学在前段光学相干断层扫描手术成功中的鉴别能力。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03770-6
Jeremy C K Tan, Matthew Roney, Matteo Posarelli, Abdus Samad Ansari, Mark Batterbury, Neeru A Vallabh
{"title":"小梁切除术泡内反射率和形态学在前段光学相干断层扫描手术成功中的鉴别能力。","authors":"Jeremy C K Tan, Matthew Roney, Matteo Posarelli, Abdus Samad Ansari, Mark Batterbury, Neeru A Vallabh","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03770-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The post-operative evaluation of trabeculectomy blebs has traditionally relied on subjective clinical grading systems performed at the slit-lamp. This study explores the use of swept source anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to objectively measure bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, and to distinguish blebs with surgical success vs. failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of patients with glaucoma who had undergone trabeculectomy at least one year prior. Swept source AS-OCT was used to capture filtering blebs in the sagittal plane. Standardised regions of interests on the sagittal plane were segmented, and pixel intensity values and bleb height were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the discriminatory ability of pixel intensity values and bleb morphology to classify blebs with surgical success or failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>100 eyes of 65 patients were included, with a median post-operative follow up of 7.0 years (IQR 3.2-16 years). The proportion of complete success, qualified success and failure was 45%, 33%, and 22% respectively. The maximum bleb height was significantly greater in the blebs with complete success (1.74 vs. 1.25 vs. 1.23 mm in CS vs. QS vs. F, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001). Mean pixel intensity was significantly lower in blebs with complete success (150.8 vs. 157.4 vs. 167.4 in CS vs. QS vs. F, p = 0.0001). Bleb intensity standard deviation (AUC 0.81), maximal bleb height (AUC 0.76), mean pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) and minimum pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) offered the best discrimination between surgical success and failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Swept-source AS-OCT can be used to quantify bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, which can be used to distinguish between well vs. poorly functioning blebs. These parameters may assist surgeons in the objective evaluation of post-operative bleb outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discriminatory power of trabeculectomy bleb internal reflectivity and morphology in surgical success using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy C K Tan, Matthew Roney, Matteo Posarelli, Abdus Samad Ansari, Mark Batterbury, Neeru A Vallabh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-024-03770-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The post-operative evaluation of trabeculectomy blebs has traditionally relied on subjective clinical grading systems performed at the slit-lamp. This study explores the use of swept source anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to objectively measure bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, and to distinguish blebs with surgical success vs. failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study of patients with glaucoma who had undergone trabeculectomy at least one year prior. Swept source AS-OCT was used to capture filtering blebs in the sagittal plane. Standardised regions of interests on the sagittal plane were segmented, and pixel intensity values and bleb height were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the discriminatory ability of pixel intensity values and bleb morphology to classify blebs with surgical success or failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>100 eyes of 65 patients were included, with a median post-operative follow up of 7.0 years (IQR 3.2-16 years). The proportion of complete success, qualified success and failure was 45%, 33%, and 22% respectively. The maximum bleb height was significantly greater in the blebs with complete success (1.74 vs. 1.25 vs. 1.23 mm in CS vs. QS vs. F, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001). Mean pixel intensity was significantly lower in blebs with complete success (150.8 vs. 157.4 vs. 167.4 in CS vs. QS vs. F, p = 0.0001). Bleb intensity standard deviation (AUC 0.81), maximal bleb height (AUC 0.76), mean pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) and minimum pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) offered the best discrimination between surgical success and failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Swept-source AS-OCT can be used to quantify bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, which can be used to distinguish between well vs. poorly functioning blebs. These parameters may assist surgeons in the objective evaluation of post-operative bleb outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03770-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03770-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:小梁切除术后的水泡的术后评价传统上依赖于主观的临床分级系统在裂隙灯执行。本研究探讨了使用扫描源前段光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)来客观测量水泡的内部反射率和形态,并区分手术成功与失败的水泡。方法:对至少一年前行小梁切除术的青光眼患者进行横断面研究。扫描源AS-OCT捕捉矢状面滤泡。对矢状面上的标准化感兴趣区域进行分割,测量像素强度值和气泡高度。使用受试者工作特征曲线来检查像素强度值和水泡形态的区分能力,以区分手术成功或失败的水泡。结果:纳入65例患者100只眼,术后中位随访7.0年(IQR 3.2 ~ 16年)。完全成功、合格成功和失败的比例分别为45%、33%和22%。结论:扫描源AS-OCT可用于量化气泡的内部反射率和形态,可用于区分功能良好和功能不良的气泡。这些参数可以帮助外科医生客观评价术后水泡的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discriminatory power of trabeculectomy bleb internal reflectivity and morphology in surgical success using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Background: The post-operative evaluation of trabeculectomy blebs has traditionally relied on subjective clinical grading systems performed at the slit-lamp. This study explores the use of swept source anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to objectively measure bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, and to distinguish blebs with surgical success vs. failure.

Methods: Cross-sectional study of patients with glaucoma who had undergone trabeculectomy at least one year prior. Swept source AS-OCT was used to capture filtering blebs in the sagittal plane. Standardised regions of interests on the sagittal plane were segmented, and pixel intensity values and bleb height were measured. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the discriminatory ability of pixel intensity values and bleb morphology to classify blebs with surgical success or failure.

Results: 100 eyes of 65 patients were included, with a median post-operative follow up of 7.0 years (IQR 3.2-16 years). The proportion of complete success, qualified success and failure was 45%, 33%, and 22% respectively. The maximum bleb height was significantly greater in the blebs with complete success (1.74 vs. 1.25 vs. 1.23 mm in CS vs. QS vs. F, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001). Mean pixel intensity was significantly lower in blebs with complete success (150.8 vs. 157.4 vs. 167.4 in CS vs. QS vs. F, p = 0.0001). Bleb intensity standard deviation (AUC 0.81), maximal bleb height (AUC 0.76), mean pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) and minimum pixel intensity (AUC 0.75) offered the best discrimination between surgical success and failure.

Conclusions: Swept-source AS-OCT can be used to quantify bleb internal reflectivity and morphology, which can be used to distinguish between well vs. poorly functioning blebs. These parameters may assist surgeons in the objective evaluation of post-operative bleb outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Resolution of disc oedema in nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy versus optic neuritis: a retrospective, cross-sectional study. Efficacy of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Recurrence rate, time to recurrence, and associated factors after primary pterygium excision with conjunctival-limbal autograft: a prospective cohort study. When Coats' disease meets a retinal break: adult-onset presentation with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Maximal levator resection as a revision strategy following failed silicone frontalis sling: outcomes on eyelid position, ocular surface and patient satisfaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1