神经胶质细胞系来源的神经营养因子(GDNF)在精神分裂症中的循环水平:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06498-9
Omran Davarinejad, Saeid Komasi, Mohammad-Taher Moradi, Farzaneh Golmohammadi, Maryam Bahrami, Hamed Esmaeil Lashgarian, Masumeh Jalalvand, Sara Hookari, Fatemeh Kazemisafa
{"title":"神经胶质细胞系来源的神经营养因子(GDNF)在精神分裂症中的循环水平:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Omran Davarinejad, Saeid Komasi, Mohammad-Taher Moradi, Farzaneh Golmohammadi, Maryam Bahrami, Hamed Esmaeil Lashgarian, Masumeh Jalalvand, Sara Hookari, Fatemeh Kazemisafa","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06498-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has emerged as a potential biomarker for schizophrenia (SCZ). However, GDNF levels remain unclear in affected individuals compared to healthy controls. Therefore, we aimed to calculate a pooled estimate of GDNF levels in patients with SCZ in comparison with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct for published studies from the first date available up to 17 June 2024. Twelve studies (n = 817 patients and 691 healthy controls) were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed, addressing heterogeneity and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Random-effects estimates (d = -0.80, p < 0.001) of the present meta-analysis revealed a significant mean difference in GDNF levels between SCZ patients and healthy controls. Subgroup analyses indicated that the standardized mean difference of GDNF was larger in European samples (d = -1.01, p ≤ 0.001) than in the Asian population (d = -0.61, p = 0.011). Non-medicated SCZ patients (d = -1.08, p ≤ 0.001) exhibited lower GDNF levels than those on medication (d = - 0.70, p = 0.004). Additionally, patients with a disease duration of ≥ 10 years showed lower levels of GDNF (d = -0.93, p = 0.058 versus d = -0.82, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggested that GDNF may be a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for schizophrenia. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying altered GDNF levels and exploring its implications for treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780850/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating Levels of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF) in Schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Omran Davarinejad, Saeid Komasi, Mohammad-Taher Moradi, Farzaneh Golmohammadi, Maryam Bahrami, Hamed Esmaeil Lashgarian, Masumeh Jalalvand, Sara Hookari, Fatemeh Kazemisafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-06498-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has emerged as a potential biomarker for schizophrenia (SCZ). However, GDNF levels remain unclear in affected individuals compared to healthy controls. Therefore, we aimed to calculate a pooled estimate of GDNF levels in patients with SCZ in comparison with healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct for published studies from the first date available up to 17 June 2024. Twelve studies (n = 817 patients and 691 healthy controls) were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed, addressing heterogeneity and publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Random-effects estimates (d = -0.80, p < 0.001) of the present meta-analysis revealed a significant mean difference in GDNF levels between SCZ patients and healthy controls. Subgroup analyses indicated that the standardized mean difference of GDNF was larger in European samples (d = -1.01, p ≤ 0.001) than in the Asian population (d = -0.61, p = 0.011). Non-medicated SCZ patients (d = -1.08, p ≤ 0.001) exhibited lower GDNF levels than those on medication (d = - 0.70, p = 0.004). Additionally, patients with a disease duration of ≥ 10 years showed lower levels of GDNF (d = -0.93, p = 0.058 versus d = -0.82, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggested that GDNF may be a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for schizophrenia. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying altered GDNF levels and exploring its implications for treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780850/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06498-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06498-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经胶质细胞系来源的神经营养因子(GDNF)已成为精神分裂症(SCZ)的潜在生物标志物。然而,与健康对照组相比,受影响个体的GDNF水平仍不清楚。因此,我们的目的是计算与健康对照比较SCZ患者GDNF水平的汇总估计。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Science Direct中首次可查日期至2024年6月17日的已发表研究。meta分析纳入了12项研究(n = 817例患者和691名健康对照)。进行亚组分析和元回归,解决异质性和发表偏倚。结果:随机效应估计(d = -0.80, p)结论:研究结果表明,GDNF可能是一种有希望的精神分裂症生物标志物和治疗靶点。未来的研究应侧重于阐明GDNF水平改变的机制,并探索其对治疗策略的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Circulating Levels of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF) in Schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has emerged as a potential biomarker for schizophrenia (SCZ). However, GDNF levels remain unclear in affected individuals compared to healthy controls. Therefore, we aimed to calculate a pooled estimate of GDNF levels in patients with SCZ in comparison with healthy controls.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct for published studies from the first date available up to 17 June 2024. Twelve studies (n = 817 patients and 691 healthy controls) were included in the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed, addressing heterogeneity and publication bias.

Results: Random-effects estimates (d = -0.80, p < 0.001) of the present meta-analysis revealed a significant mean difference in GDNF levels between SCZ patients and healthy controls. Subgroup analyses indicated that the standardized mean difference of GDNF was larger in European samples (d = -1.01, p ≤ 0.001) than in the Asian population (d = -0.61, p = 0.011). Non-medicated SCZ patients (d = -1.08, p ≤ 0.001) exhibited lower GDNF levels than those on medication (d = - 0.70, p = 0.004). Additionally, patients with a disease duration of ≥ 10 years showed lower levels of GDNF (d = -0.93, p = 0.058 versus d = -0.82, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: The findings suggested that GDNF may be a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for schizophrenia. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying altered GDNF levels and exploring its implications for treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
DIALOG+ for service users with chronic depression: a cluster-randomised controlled feasibility trial and qualitative evaluation. Association between visceral adiposity index and incident dementia: a community-based cohort study. Non-pharmacological interventions for antipsychotic drug-related metabolic abnormalities: a systematic narrative review. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in adolescents with depression. A randomized controlled trial of an Internet-based self-help skill strengthening (ISSS) intervention for secondary school teachers: a transdiagnostic intervention for common mental health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1