杜克活动状态指数在肥胖减肥手术患者中的可靠性和有效性:对预后价值的见解。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07714-x
Hamdiye Turan, Zeynal Yasacı, Hasan Elkan
{"title":"杜克活动状态指数在肥胖减肥手术患者中的可靠性和有效性:对预后价值的见解。","authors":"Hamdiye Turan, Zeynal Yasacı, Hasan Elkan","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07714-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a global health issue that complicates surgical outcomes, particularly in bariatric/metabolic surgery candidates. Assessing functional capacity is critical for optimizing preoperative planning and postoperative care. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that estimates functional capacity based on daily activities. This study evaluates the reliability and clinical applicability of the DASI as an alternative to the 6-min walk test (6-MWT) for bariatric/metabolic surgery individuals living with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 126 individuals who are candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery. Participants completed the DASI and 6-MWT. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and validity was evaluated through correlations with 6-MWT results. The agreement was measured using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DASI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). A strong correlation was observed between DASI and 6-MWT scores (r = 0.603; p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed an optimal cut-off score of 24.1 (AUC = 0.836), with 72.2% sensitivity and 74.1% specificity. The SEM and MDC values were 2.36 and 6.54 points, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DASI is a reliable, accessible tool for bariatric surgeons to assess functional capacity in candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery. Its simplicity, strong correlation with performance-based measures, and minimal resource requirements make it ideal for preoperative evaluations, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"860-866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validity of the Duke Activity Status Index in Bariatric Surgery Individuals Living with Obesity: Insights into Prognostic Value.\",\"authors\":\"Hamdiye Turan, Zeynal Yasacı, Hasan Elkan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-025-07714-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a global health issue that complicates surgical outcomes, particularly in bariatric/metabolic surgery candidates. Assessing functional capacity is critical for optimizing preoperative planning and postoperative care. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that estimates functional capacity based on daily activities. This study evaluates the reliability and clinical applicability of the DASI as an alternative to the 6-min walk test (6-MWT) for bariatric/metabolic surgery individuals living with obesity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 126 individuals who are candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery. Participants completed the DASI and 6-MWT. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and validity was evaluated through correlations with 6-MWT results. The agreement was measured using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DASI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). A strong correlation was observed between DASI and 6-MWT scores (r = 0.603; p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed an optimal cut-off score of 24.1 (AUC = 0.836), with 72.2% sensitivity and 74.1% specificity. The SEM and MDC values were 2.36 and 6.54 points, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DASI is a reliable, accessible tool for bariatric surgeons to assess functional capacity in candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery. Its simplicity, strong correlation with performance-based measures, and minimal resource requirements make it ideal for preoperative evaluations, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"860-866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07714-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07714-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肥胖是一个全球性的健康问题,使手术结果复杂化,特别是在减肥/代谢手术候选人中。评估功能能力是优化术前计划和术后护理的关键。杜克活动状态指数(DASI)是一个简单的、自我管理的问卷,它根据日常活动来估计功能能力。本研究评估了DASI作为6分钟步行测试(6-MWT)替代肥胖/代谢手术患者的可靠性和临床适用性。方法:这项横断面研究包括126名接受减肥/代谢手术的患者。参与者完成DASI和6-MWT。采用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估重测信度,通过与6-MWT结果的相关性评估效度。使用测量的标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)来测量一致性。结果:DASI具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86)和重测信度(ICC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96 ~ 0.98)。DASI与6-MWT评分有很强的相关性(r = 0.603;结论:DASI是减肥外科医生评估减肥/代谢手术候选人功能能力的可靠、方便的工具。它的简单性、与基于绩效的措施的强相关性以及最小的资源需求使其成为术前评估的理想选择,特别是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and Validity of the Duke Activity Status Index in Bariatric Surgery Individuals Living with Obesity: Insights into Prognostic Value.

Background: Obesity is a global health issue that complicates surgical outcomes, particularly in bariatric/metabolic surgery candidates. Assessing functional capacity is critical for optimizing preoperative planning and postoperative care. The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) is a simple, self-administered questionnaire that estimates functional capacity based on daily activities. This study evaluates the reliability and clinical applicability of the DASI as an alternative to the 6-min walk test (6-MWT) for bariatric/metabolic surgery individuals living with obesity.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 126 individuals who are candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery. Participants completed the DASI and 6-MWT. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and validity was evaluated through correlations with 6-MWT results. The agreement was measured using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC).

Results: The DASI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). A strong correlation was observed between DASI and 6-MWT scores (r = 0.603; p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed an optimal cut-off score of 24.1 (AUC = 0.836), with 72.2% sensitivity and 74.1% specificity. The SEM and MDC values were 2.36 and 6.54 points, respectively.

Conclusions: The DASI is a reliable, accessible tool for bariatric surgeons to assess functional capacity in candidates for bariatric/metabolic surgery. Its simplicity, strong correlation with performance-based measures, and minimal resource requirements make it ideal for preoperative evaluations, particularly in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Machine Learning Prediction Models for Weight Loss Outcomes after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Food Consumption by Processing Levels in Adults Two or More Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Associations with Surgical Outcomes and Eating Behaviors. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass versus Sleeve Gastrectomy for Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Comparative Animal Study of the Performance of Two Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Devices. Effects of Time-Restricted Eating With Calorie Restriction Versus Calorie Restriction on Health Outcomes in Patients With Weight Regain Post-Sleeve Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1