社区精神卫生中心患者使用长效注射抗精神病药物的分布及相关因素

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116378
Matthew C. Lohman , Victoria Scott , Mansi Verma , Paige Jones , Eve Fields
{"title":"社区精神卫生中心患者使用长效注射抗精神病药物的分布及相关因素","authors":"Matthew C. Lohman ,&nbsp;Victoria Scott ,&nbsp;Mansi Verma ,&nbsp;Paige Jones ,&nbsp;Eve Fields","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are an important pharmaceutical option in the management of schizophrenia and related disorders, little is known about patient characteristics related to LAI use in real-world outpatient settings. We analyzed electronic medical records from 41,401 patients who received psychiatric services from one of 16 regional mental health centers operated by the South Carolina Department of Mental Health in 2022. We compared the use of first- and second-generation LAIs and oral antipsychotics by sociodemographic (age, gender, race/ethnicity, zip code, payment source) and clinical characteristics (psychiatric diagnoses, service use). We used logistic regression models to estimate associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of using LAIs. In total, 7,029 (17.0 %) patients used LAIs in 2022, including 5,901 with schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder. Compared to White patients, Black (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.19, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.96 – 2.44) and Asian (OR: 3.39, 95 % CI: 1.54 – 7.43) patients were significantly more likely to use LAIs, controlling for other patient demographic and clinical characteristics. LAI users were also more likely to be male (OR: 1.83, 95 % CI: 1.64, 2.03), to live in suburban areas (OR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.10, 1.42), and to use Medicaid (OR: 1.55, 95 % CI: 1.34, 1.79). Similar differences were not found for oral antipsychotics. Results suggest that LAI use differs substantially by patient characteristics independent of psychiatric diagnoses. Identifying and understanding reasons for differences in LAI use is important to promote equitable access to and use of LAIs across racial, geographic, and other sociodemographic groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 116378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distribution and correlates of long-acting injectable antipsychotic use among community mental health center patients\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C. Lohman ,&nbsp;Victoria Scott ,&nbsp;Mansi Verma ,&nbsp;Paige Jones ,&nbsp;Eve Fields\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are an important pharmaceutical option in the management of schizophrenia and related disorders, little is known about patient characteristics related to LAI use in real-world outpatient settings. We analyzed electronic medical records from 41,401 patients who received psychiatric services from one of 16 regional mental health centers operated by the South Carolina Department of Mental Health in 2022. We compared the use of first- and second-generation LAIs and oral antipsychotics by sociodemographic (age, gender, race/ethnicity, zip code, payment source) and clinical characteristics (psychiatric diagnoses, service use). We used logistic regression models to estimate associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of using LAIs. In total, 7,029 (17.0 %) patients used LAIs in 2022, including 5,901 with schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder. Compared to White patients, Black (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.19, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.96 – 2.44) and Asian (OR: 3.39, 95 % CI: 1.54 – 7.43) patients were significantly more likely to use LAIs, controlling for other patient demographic and clinical characteristics. LAI users were also more likely to be male (OR: 1.83, 95 % CI: 1.64, 2.03), to live in suburban areas (OR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.10, 1.42), and to use Medicaid (OR: 1.55, 95 % CI: 1.34, 1.79). Similar differences were not found for oral antipsychotics. Results suggest that LAI use differs substantially by patient characteristics independent of psychiatric diagnoses. Identifying and understanding reasons for differences in LAI use is important to promote equitable access to and use of LAIs across racial, geographic, and other sociodemographic groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"volume\":\"345 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125000277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178125000277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管长效注射抗精神病药物(LAIs)是治疗精神分裂症和相关疾病的重要药物选择,但在现实世界的门诊环境中,人们对与LAI使用相关的患者特征知之甚少。我们分析了41,401名患者的电子医疗记录,这些患者在2022年从南卡罗来纳州精神卫生部门运营的16个区域精神卫生中心之一接受了精神病学服务。我们通过社会人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族/民族、邮政编码、付款来源)和临床特征(精神病诊断、服务使用)比较了第一代和第二代LAIs和口服抗精神病药物的使用情况。我们使用逻辑回归模型来估计患者特征与使用LAIs的可能性之间的关联。2022年共有7029例(17.0%)患者使用LAIs,其中包括5901例精神分裂症或其他精神障碍患者。与白人患者相比,黑人患者(比值比(OR): 2.19, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.96 - 2.44)和亚裔患者(OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.54 - 7.43)在控制其他患者人口统计学和临床特征的情况下,更有可能使用LAIs。LAI使用者也更有可能是男性(OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.64, 2.03),居住在郊区(OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42),并使用医疗补助(OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.34, 1.79)。在口服抗精神病药物中没有发现类似的差异。结果表明,独立于精神病学诊断的患者特征不同,LAI的使用有很大差异。识别和理解LAI使用差异的原因对于促进跨种族、地理和其他社会人口群体公平获取和使用LAI非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distribution and correlates of long-acting injectable antipsychotic use among community mental health center patients
Although long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are an important pharmaceutical option in the management of schizophrenia and related disorders, little is known about patient characteristics related to LAI use in real-world outpatient settings. We analyzed electronic medical records from 41,401 patients who received psychiatric services from one of 16 regional mental health centers operated by the South Carolina Department of Mental Health in 2022. We compared the use of first- and second-generation LAIs and oral antipsychotics by sociodemographic (age, gender, race/ethnicity, zip code, payment source) and clinical characteristics (psychiatric diagnoses, service use). We used logistic regression models to estimate associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of using LAIs. In total, 7,029 (17.0 %) patients used LAIs in 2022, including 5,901 with schizophrenia or another psychotic disorder. Compared to White patients, Black (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.19, 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 1.96 – 2.44) and Asian (OR: 3.39, 95 % CI: 1.54 – 7.43) patients were significantly more likely to use LAIs, controlling for other patient demographic and clinical characteristics. LAI users were also more likely to be male (OR: 1.83, 95 % CI: 1.64, 2.03), to live in suburban areas (OR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.10, 1.42), and to use Medicaid (OR: 1.55, 95 % CI: 1.34, 1.79). Similar differences were not found for oral antipsychotics. Results suggest that LAI use differs substantially by patient characteristics independent of psychiatric diagnoses. Identifying and understanding reasons for differences in LAI use is important to promote equitable access to and use of LAIs across racial, geographic, and other sociodemographic groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Impulsivity, reward sensitivity, and dopamine 2/3 receptors availability in people with cocaine use disorder: A [11C]PHNO PET study Developmental shift in the functional role of mind-wandering: A large-scale study on adaptive resources against depression in psychiatric outpatients 20-year pharmacological treatment trajectories in a cohort of patients with bipolar disorder Investigation of potential associations between four redox-related long non-coding RNAs and glutathione peroxidase in schizophrenia: a combination of bioinformatics and experimental analyses Digital phenotyping using wearable-determined physical behaviours and machine learning to detect depression and anxiety symptoms in a general population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1