生活方式干预抑郁症在初级保健:一项定性研究。

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-27 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0233
Jolien Panjer, Manna Alma, Tryntsje Fokkema, Tom Hendriks, Daniëlle Cath, Jolien Kik, Huibert Burger, Marjolein Berger
{"title":"生活方式干预抑郁症在初级保健:一项定性研究。","authors":"Jolien Panjer, Manna Alma, Tryntsje Fokkema, Tom Hendriks, Daniëlle Cath, Jolien Kik, Huibert Burger, Marjolein Berger","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In individuals with depression a vicious cycle tends to occur in which depressive symptoms cause an unhealthy lifestyle, which reversibly causes an increase in depressive symptoms; both of which are associated with a decreased life expectancy. A potential way to break this cycle entails a multicomponent lifestyle intervention (MLI).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the barriers and facilitators for an MLI in patients with depressive symptoms from the perspective of GPs, chronic disease practice nurses (CD-PNs), mental health nurses (MHNs), lifestyle coaches (LC), and patients.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in Dutch primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We interviewed five GPs, six MHNs, five CD-PNs, five LCs, and seven patients. Focus was on possible barriers and facilitators for an MLI. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. A focus group was used as a member check.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following five themes were identified: expectations of effectiveness; motivation; stigma; logistics and organisation; and communication by professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ideas on effectiveness were crucial and could be either a facilitator or a barrier for a depression-tailored MLI (DT-MLI). Professionals often had high expectations, based on work experience, making this a facilitator. Other facilitators were motivating participants, good logistics and good communication by professionals, thus destigmatising depression. Patients considered being motivated by the programme as a reason for participating, as they did not expect a DT-MLI would give them new information. Support from others was considered a motivator to participate.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Jolien Panjer, Manna Alma, Tryntsje Fokkema, Tom Hendriks, Daniëlle Cath, Jolien Kik, Huibert Burger, Marjolein Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In individuals with depression a vicious cycle tends to occur in which depressive symptoms cause an unhealthy lifestyle, which reversibly causes an increase in depressive symptoms; both of which are associated with a decreased life expectancy. A potential way to break this cycle entails a multicomponent lifestyle intervention (MLI).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the barriers and facilitators for an MLI in patients with depressive symptoms from the perspective of GPs, chronic disease practice nurses (CD-PNs), mental health nurses (MHNs), lifestyle coaches (LC), and patients.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in Dutch primary care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We interviewed five GPs, six MHNs, five CD-PNs, five LCs, and seven patients. Focus was on possible barriers and facilitators for an MLI. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. A focus group was used as a member check.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following five themes were identified: expectations of effectiveness; motivation; stigma; logistics and organisation; and communication by professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ideas on effectiveness were crucial and could be either a facilitator or a barrier for a depression-tailored MLI (DT-MLI). Professionals often had high expectations, based on work experience, making this a facilitator. Other facilitators were motivating participants, good logistics and good communication by professionals, thus destigmatising depression. Patients considered being motivated by the programme as a reason for participating, as they did not expect a DT-MLI would give them new information. Support from others was considered a motivator to participate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12728876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抑郁症患者往往会出现恶性循环,抑郁症状导致不健康的生活方式,而不健康的生活方式又会导致抑郁症状的加重;这两种情况都与预期寿命缩短有关。打破这种循环的一种潜在方法是多组分生活方式干预(MLI)。目的:从全科医生(GP)、慢性病执业护士(CD-PN)、心理健康护士(MHN)、生活方式教练(LC)和患者(PT)的角度探讨抑郁症状患者实施MLI的障碍和促进因素。设计与设置:在荷兰初级保健中使用半结构化访谈的定性研究。方法对5名gp、6名mhn、5名cd - pn、5名lc和7名PTs进行访谈。重点是可能存在的障碍和促进因素。数据采用专题分析进行分析。使用焦点小组作为成员检查。结果:确定了五个主题:“有效性期望”、“动机”、“耻辱”、“后勤和组织”和“专业人员沟通”。结论:关于有效性的想法是至关重要的,既可以成为DT-MLI的推动者,也可以成为障碍。基于工作经验,专业人士通常有很高的期望,这是一个促进因素。其他促进因素包括激励参与者、良好的后勤和专业人员的良好沟通,从而消除抑郁症的污名。患者认为被该计划激励是参与的原因,因为他们不期望DT-MLI会给他们新的信息。来自他人的支持被认为是参与的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lifestyle interventions for depression in primary care: a qualitative study.

Background: In individuals with depression a vicious cycle tends to occur in which depressive symptoms cause an unhealthy lifestyle, which reversibly causes an increase in depressive symptoms; both of which are associated with a decreased life expectancy. A potential way to break this cycle entails a multicomponent lifestyle intervention (MLI).

Aim: To explore the barriers and facilitators for an MLI in patients with depressive symptoms from the perspective of GPs, chronic disease practice nurses (CD-PNs), mental health nurses (MHNs), lifestyle coaches (LC), and patients.

Design & setting: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews in Dutch primary care.

Method: We interviewed five GPs, six MHNs, five CD-PNs, five LCs, and seven patients. Focus was on possible barriers and facilitators for an MLI. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. A focus group was used as a member check.

Results: The following five themes were identified: expectations of effectiveness; motivation; stigma; logistics and organisation; and communication by professionals.

Conclusion: Ideas on effectiveness were crucial and could be either a facilitator or a barrier for a depression-tailored MLI (DT-MLI). Professionals often had high expectations, based on work experience, making this a facilitator. Other facilitators were motivating participants, good logistics and good communication by professionals, thus destigmatising depression. Patients considered being motivated by the programme as a reason for participating, as they did not expect a DT-MLI would give them new information. Support from others was considered a motivator to participate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primary care practitioners' perspectives on medicine optimisation for older people from ethnic minorities with polypharmacy in primary care: a realist evaluation. Teleconferencing as an alternative to written Advice and Guidance referrals at the primary-secondary care interface: a qualitative case study. Use of digital technology among patients with multiple long-term conditions: a qualitative systematic review. Socioeconomic inequalities in primary care research: how can we make research more equitable? A quantitative and qualitative service evaluation. Single-item Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI-Q2) as a feedback tool in primary health care: a qualitative study among Finnish primary care physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1