结合相关散射的近期有效介质模型和不同有效介质模型的详细比较。

IF 1.5 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 OPTICS Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1364/JOSAA.533717
Alexander Nahmad-Rohen, Augusto García-Valenzuela
{"title":"结合相关散射的近期有效介质模型和不同有效介质模型的详细比较。","authors":"Alexander Nahmad-Rohen, Augusto García-Valenzuela","doi":"10.1364/JOSAA.533717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We compare the predictions of two recently derived effective-medium models for the effective refractive index of a turbid suspension of particles. The two formulas are notoriously dissimilar; both are based on the quasi-crystalline approximation, but the approximations used beyond this point are entirely different. Nevertheless, for dilute suspensions both reduce to the well-established van de Hulst formula. The dissimilarities between the formulas are evident for dense suspensions, where dependent-scattering effects are important. When they might coincide is, therefore, not clear. The purpose of this work is to explore the range of particle parameters and volume fractions for which both models are applicable. Our results show that, rather surprisingly, the models produce very similar curves of the real and imaginary parts of the effective refractive index for volume fractions up to 0.4 and for particles comparable to, and larger than, the wavelength, as well as for a fairly large range of refractive-index contrasts between the particles and the surrounding medium. These results significantly increase our confidence in the validity of both models.</p>","PeriodicalId":17382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision","volume":"41 10","pages":"1994-2003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detailed comparison of recent-and dissimilar-effective-medium models incorporating dependent scattering.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Nahmad-Rohen, Augusto García-Valenzuela\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/JOSAA.533717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We compare the predictions of two recently derived effective-medium models for the effective refractive index of a turbid suspension of particles. The two formulas are notoriously dissimilar; both are based on the quasi-crystalline approximation, but the approximations used beyond this point are entirely different. Nevertheless, for dilute suspensions both reduce to the well-established van de Hulst formula. The dissimilarities between the formulas are evident for dense suspensions, where dependent-scattering effects are important. When they might coincide is, therefore, not clear. The purpose of this work is to explore the range of particle parameters and volume fractions for which both models are applicable. Our results show that, rather surprisingly, the models produce very similar curves of the real and imaginary parts of the effective refractive index for volume fractions up to 0.4 and for particles comparable to, and larger than, the wavelength, as well as for a fairly large range of refractive-index contrasts between the particles and the surrounding medium. These results significantly increase our confidence in the validity of both models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision\",\"volume\":\"41 10\",\"pages\":\"1994-2003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.533717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.533717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们比较了两种最近导出的有效介质模型对浑浊悬浮粒子的有效折射率的预测。这两个公式是出了名的不同;两者都是基于准晶体近似,但在这一点之外使用的近似是完全不同的。然而,对于稀悬浮液,两者都可归结为公认的范德胡斯特公式。对于稠密悬浮液,公式之间的差异是明显的,其中依赖散射效应是重要的。因此,它们何时可能重合并不清楚。这项工作的目的是探索两个模型都适用的颗粒参数和体积分数的范围。我们的结果表明,相当令人惊讶的是,对于体积分数高达0.4,与波长相当或大于波长的粒子,以及粒子与周围介质之间相当大范围的折射率差异,模型产生了非常相似的有效折射率的实部和虚部曲线。这些结果显著增加了我们对两个模型有效性的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detailed comparison of recent-and dissimilar-effective-medium models incorporating dependent scattering.

We compare the predictions of two recently derived effective-medium models for the effective refractive index of a turbid suspension of particles. The two formulas are notoriously dissimilar; both are based on the quasi-crystalline approximation, but the approximations used beyond this point are entirely different. Nevertheless, for dilute suspensions both reduce to the well-established van de Hulst formula. The dissimilarities between the formulas are evident for dense suspensions, where dependent-scattering effects are important. When they might coincide is, therefore, not clear. The purpose of this work is to explore the range of particle parameters and volume fractions for which both models are applicable. Our results show that, rather surprisingly, the models produce very similar curves of the real and imaginary parts of the effective refractive index for volume fractions up to 0.4 and for particles comparable to, and larger than, the wavelength, as well as for a fairly large range of refractive-index contrasts between the particles and the surrounding medium. These results significantly increase our confidence in the validity of both models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
417
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Optical Society of America A (JOSA A) is devoted to developments in any field of classical optics, image science, and vision. JOSA A includes original peer-reviewed papers on such topics as: * Atmospheric optics * Clinical vision * Coherence and Statistical Optics * Color * Diffraction and gratings * Image processing * Machine vision * Physiological optics * Polarization * Scattering * Signal processing * Thin films * Visual optics Also: j opt soc am a.
期刊最新文献
Advances in digital holography, 3-D imaging, and optical information processing: introduction. Effect of texture on suprathreshold color-difference tolerances: dataset of visual tolerances. Branch point agnostic full optical field reconstruction using Shack-Hartmann data. Autofocusing characteristics of Bessel-modulated circular Airy and circular Airyprime beams propagating in free space. Continuous recovery of phase from a single interferogram.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1