Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Jennell Palaia, Leon A Sakkal, Divya Patel, Andriy Moshyk, Natalia Han, Shardul Odak, Jordana K Schmier, Ning Ning, Sunandana Chandra
{"title":"黑素瘤脑转移患者的实际预后:美国系统性治疗的多部位回顾性图表回顾研究","authors":"Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Jennell Palaia, Leon A Sakkal, Divya Patel, Andriy Moshyk, Natalia Han, Shardul Odak, Jordana K Schmier, Ning Ning, Sunandana Chandra","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) treated with first-line immunotherapy consisting of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapy consisting of BRAF/MEK inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic medical centres, community hospitals and private practice offices.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Included patients diagnosed with melanoma with brain metastasis in the USA.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The statistical analysis was descriptive in nature. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 472 patients with MBM who received first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=246), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n=112) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (n=114) were identified. Patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab, compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, had favourable baseline prognostic factors, such as younger age, fewer or smaller brain metastases, better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and less frequently elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Median follow-up times were 15.4 months (range 0.1 to 37.0), 13.3 months (range 0.3 to 36.6) and 13.9 months (range 1.9 to 36.5), respectively. Numerically longer OS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.67) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.04) and numerically longer PFS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12). With nivolumab plus ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, 1-year OS rates were 79%, 60% and 72%, respectively; 1-year PFS rates were 68%, 58% and 59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world study, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab appeared to provide benefit versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with MBM, consistent with pivotal trial data. However, the observed benefit may have been due to confounding and selection bias, given that patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab had favourable baseline prognostic factors compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e091098"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a US multisite retrospective chart review study of systemic treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Isabella C Glitza Oliva, Jennell Palaia, Leon A Sakkal, Divya Patel, Andriy Moshyk, Natalia Han, Shardul Odak, Jordana K Schmier, Ning Ning, Sunandana Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) treated with first-line immunotherapy consisting of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapy consisting of BRAF/MEK inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective chart review study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic medical centres, community hospitals and private practice offices.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Included patients diagnosed with melanoma with brain metastasis in the USA.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The statistical analysis was descriptive in nature. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 472 patients with MBM who received first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=246), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n=112) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (n=114) were identified. Patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab, compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, had favourable baseline prognostic factors, such as younger age, fewer or smaller brain metastases, better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and less frequently elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Median follow-up times were 15.4 months (range 0.1 to 37.0), 13.3 months (range 0.3 to 36.6) and 13.9 months (range 1.9 to 36.5), respectively. Numerically longer OS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.67) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.04) and numerically longer PFS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12). With nivolumab plus ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, 1-year OS rates were 79%, 60% and 72%, respectively; 1-year PFS rates were 68%, 58% and 59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world study, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab appeared to provide benefit versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with MBM, consistent with pivotal trial data. However, the observed benefit may have been due to confounding and selection bias, given that patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab had favourable baseline prognostic factors compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e091098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091098\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨了黑色素瘤脑转移(MBM)患者接受一线免疫治疗的现实世界治疗模式和结果,一线免疫治疗包括纳沃单抗加伊匹单抗或抗程序性死亡-1 (PD-1)单药治疗(纳沃单抗或派姆单抗)或BRAF/MEK抑制剂靶向治疗。设计:回顾性图表回顾研究。环境:学术医疗中心、社区医院和私人诊所。参与者:包括在美国诊断为黑色素瘤伴脑转移的患者。结果测量:统计分析是描述性的。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),并在单变量Cox比例风险模型中比较治疗间的差异。结果:共有472例MBM患者接受了一线纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗(n=246)、抗pd -1单药治疗(n=112)或BRAF/MEK抑制剂(n=114)。与接受抗pd -1单药治疗或BRAF/MEK抑制剂治疗的患者相比,接受nivolumab + ipilimumab治疗的患者具有良好的基线预后因素,如年龄更年轻,脑转移灶更少或更小,东部肿瘤合作组的表现状态更好,乳酸脱氢酶升高的频率更低。中位随访时间分别为15.4个月(0.1 ~ 37.0)、13.3个月(0.3 ~ 36.6)和13.9个月(1.9 ~ 36.5)。nivolumab + ipilimumab与抗pd -1单药治疗(HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34至0.67)或BRAF/MEK抑制剂(HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50至1.04)相比,观察到更长时间的OS, nivolumab + ipilimumab与抗pd -1单药治疗(HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53至1.02)或BRAF/MEK抑制剂(HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60至1.12)观察到更长时间的PFS。纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗、抗pd -1单药治疗和BRAF/MEK抑制剂,1年OS率分别为79%、60%和72%;1年PFS率分别为68%、58%和59%。结论:在这项现实世界的研究中,与抗pd -1单药治疗和BRAF/MEK抑制剂相比,一线nivolumab + ipilimumab似乎在MBM患者中提供了益处,这与关键试验数据一致。然而,观察到的获益可能是由于混杂和选择偏倚,因为与接受抗pd -1单药治疗或BRAF/MEK抑制剂的患者相比,接受纳沃单抗加伊匹单抗的患者具有有利的基线预后因素。
Real-world outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis: a US multisite retrospective chart review study of systemic treatments.
Objective: This study examined real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) treated with first-line immunotherapy consisting of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) monotherapy (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or targeted therapy consisting of BRAF/MEK inhibitors.
Design: Retrospective chart review study.
Setting: Academic medical centres, community hospitals and private practice offices.
Participants: Included patients diagnosed with melanoma with brain metastasis in the USA.
Outcome measures: The statistical analysis was descriptive in nature. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatments in a univariate Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: In total, 472 patients with MBM who received first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=246), anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n=112) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (n=114) were identified. Patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab, compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, had favourable baseline prognostic factors, such as younger age, fewer or smaller brain metastases, better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and less frequently elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Median follow-up times were 15.4 months (range 0.1 to 37.0), 13.3 months (range 0.3 to 36.6) and 13.9 months (range 1.9 to 36.5), respectively. Numerically longer OS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.67) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.04) and numerically longer PFS was observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.02) or BRAF/MEK inhibitors (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12). With nivolumab plus ipilimumab, anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, 1-year OS rates were 79%, 60% and 72%, respectively; 1-year PFS rates were 68%, 58% and 59%.
Conclusions: In this real-world study, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab appeared to provide benefit versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with MBM, consistent with pivotal trial data. However, the observed benefit may have been due to confounding and selection bias, given that patients receiving nivolumab plus ipilimumab had favourable baseline prognostic factors compared with patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy or BRAF/MEK inhibitors.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.