分娩医院忙碌对小早产儿早期死亡率的影响:2006-2016年芬兰人群队列研究

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086868
Riitta Vilkko, Seppo Heinonen, Sari Räisänen, Mika Gissler, Sture Andersson, Markus Leskinen
{"title":"分娩医院忙碌对小早产儿早期死亡率的影响:2006-2016年芬兰人群队列研究","authors":"Riitta Vilkko, Seppo Heinonen, Sari Räisänen, Mika Gissler, Sture Andersson, Markus Leskinen","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of delivery hospital busyness on the postnatal condition and the perinatal mortality among small preterm infants born at ≤32+0 gestational weeks.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The daily delivery volume distribution is defined as lowest 10% ('quiet') and highest 10% ('busy') delivery-volume days, and days between (80%) as optimal delivery-volume days. We analysed differences in the incidence of selected adverse outcomes between quiet and busy days compared with optimal delivery-volume days by logistic regression followed by crude (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 99% CIs.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A population-based cohort study based on prospectively collected real-world data from five university hospitals and 21 non-tertiary-level delivery hospitals in Finland, 2006‒2016.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>4323 small preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>Umbilical cord pH ≤7.05, Apgar score 0-3 points at the age of 1 min, Apgar score 0-3 points at age 5 min, birth asphyxia (International Classification of Diseases-10 code), resuscitation with intubation.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcome measures: </strong>Perinatal mortality comprising stillbirths and early neonatal deaths (<7 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Busy days (busy vs optimal) showed no correlation with the primary birth-related outcomes. However, in the university hospitals, quiet days were associated with 80% lower odds of asphyxia (aOR 0.20, 99% CI 0.08 to 0.48) and 47% lower odds of resuscitation (aOR 0.53, 99% CI 0.39 to 0.72) compared with their incidence on optimal days.In university hospitals, the odds of early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants on busy days were twofold (aOR 2.08, 99% CI 1.26 to 3.45) than on optimal days. In the non-tertiary hospitals, however, this difference was statistically non-significant (aOR 0.68, 99% CI 0.19 to 2.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the tertiary university delivery hospitals, busyness was associated with a twofold increase in early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants, whereas infants' condition at birth on busy days was comparable to their condition on optimal days. Neonatal capacity in tertiary units during busy days may be critical under stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e086868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of delivery hospital busyness on early mortality in small preterm infants: a Finnish population-based cohort study in 2006-2016.\",\"authors\":\"Riitta Vilkko, Seppo Heinonen, Sari Räisänen, Mika Gissler, Sture Andersson, Markus Leskinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effect of delivery hospital busyness on the postnatal condition and the perinatal mortality among small preterm infants born at ≤32+0 gestational weeks.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The daily delivery volume distribution is defined as lowest 10% ('quiet') and highest 10% ('busy') delivery-volume days, and days between (80%) as optimal delivery-volume days. We analysed differences in the incidence of selected adverse outcomes between quiet and busy days compared with optimal delivery-volume days by logistic regression followed by crude (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 99% CIs.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A population-based cohort study based on prospectively collected real-world data from five university hospitals and 21 non-tertiary-level delivery hospitals in Finland, 2006‒2016.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>4323 small preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>Umbilical cord pH ≤7.05, Apgar score 0-3 points at the age of 1 min, Apgar score 0-3 points at age 5 min, birth asphyxia (International Classification of Diseases-10 code), resuscitation with intubation.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcome measures: </strong>Perinatal mortality comprising stillbirths and early neonatal deaths (<7 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Busy days (busy vs optimal) showed no correlation with the primary birth-related outcomes. However, in the university hospitals, quiet days were associated with 80% lower odds of asphyxia (aOR 0.20, 99% CI 0.08 to 0.48) and 47% lower odds of resuscitation (aOR 0.53, 99% CI 0.39 to 0.72) compared with their incidence on optimal days.In university hospitals, the odds of early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants on busy days were twofold (aOR 2.08, 99% CI 1.26 to 3.45) than on optimal days. In the non-tertiary hospitals, however, this difference was statistically non-significant (aOR 0.68, 99% CI 0.19 to 2.45).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the tertiary university delivery hospitals, busyness was associated with a twofold increase in early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants, whereas infants' condition at birth on busy days was comparable to their condition on optimal days. Neonatal capacity in tertiary units during busy days may be critical under stress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e086868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨分娩医院忙碌对≤32+0胎周出生的小早产儿产后状况及围产儿死亡率的影响。设计:每日交付量分布被定义为最低10%(“安静”)和最高10%(“繁忙”)交付量天数,而介于(80%)之间的天数为最佳交付量天数。我们通过逻辑回归分析了安静日和繁忙日与最佳产生量日之间选定不良结局发生率的差异,然后是粗ORs (or)和调整ORs (aORs), ci为99%。背景:一项基于人群的队列研究,该研究前瞻性地收集了2006-2016年芬兰5所大学医院和21所非三级分娩医院的真实数据。研究对象:4323例小早产儿。主要观察指标:脐带pH≤7.05,1 min时Apgar评分0-3分,5 min时Apgar评分0-3分,出生窒息(国际疾病分类-10码),插管复苏。次要结局指标:围产期死亡率,包括死产和新生儿早期死亡(结果:忙碌的日子(忙碌vs最佳)显示与主要出生相关的结局无关。然而,在大学医院,与最佳天数相比,安静天数的窒息发生率降低80% (aOR 0.20, 99% CI 0.08 ~ 0.48),复苏发生率降低47% (aOR 0.53, 99% CI 0.39 ~ 0.72)。在大学医院,忙碌日子小早产儿早期新生儿死亡的几率是最佳日子的两倍(aOR 2.08, 99% CI 1.26至3.45)。然而,在非三级医院,这种差异无统计学意义(aOR 0.68, 99% CI 0.19 ~ 2.45)。结论:在三级大学分娩医院,忙碌与小早产儿早期新生儿死亡率增加两倍有关,而忙碌日子出生的婴儿状况与最佳日子出生的婴儿状况相当。在繁忙的日子里,第三单位的新生儿能力在压力下可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of delivery hospital busyness on early mortality in small preterm infants: a Finnish population-based cohort study in 2006-2016.

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of delivery hospital busyness on the postnatal condition and the perinatal mortality among small preterm infants born at ≤32+0 gestational weeks.

Design: The daily delivery volume distribution is defined as lowest 10% ('quiet') and highest 10% ('busy') delivery-volume days, and days between (80%) as optimal delivery-volume days. We analysed differences in the incidence of selected adverse outcomes between quiet and busy days compared with optimal delivery-volume days by logistic regression followed by crude (ORs) and adjusted ORs (aORs) with 99% CIs.

Setting: A population-based cohort study based on prospectively collected real-world data from five university hospitals and 21 non-tertiary-level delivery hospitals in Finland, 2006‒2016.

Participants: 4323 small preterm infants.

Primary outcome measures: Umbilical cord pH ≤7.05, Apgar score 0-3 points at the age of 1 min, Apgar score 0-3 points at age 5 min, birth asphyxia (International Classification of Diseases-10 code), resuscitation with intubation.

Secondary outcome measures: Perinatal mortality comprising stillbirths and early neonatal deaths (<7 days).

Results: Busy days (busy vs optimal) showed no correlation with the primary birth-related outcomes. However, in the university hospitals, quiet days were associated with 80% lower odds of asphyxia (aOR 0.20, 99% CI 0.08 to 0.48) and 47% lower odds of resuscitation (aOR 0.53, 99% CI 0.39 to 0.72) compared with their incidence on optimal days.In university hospitals, the odds of early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants on busy days were twofold (aOR 2.08, 99% CI 1.26 to 3.45) than on optimal days. In the non-tertiary hospitals, however, this difference was statistically non-significant (aOR 0.68, 99% CI 0.19 to 2.45).

Conclusions: In the tertiary university delivery hospitals, busyness was associated with a twofold increase in early neonatal mortality among small preterm infants, whereas infants' condition at birth on busy days was comparable to their condition on optimal days. Neonatal capacity in tertiary units during busy days may be critical under stress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Vitamin B12 deficiency in long-term metformin use and clinician awareness: a scoping review. Vision Intervention for Seeing Impaired Babies: Learning through Enrichment (VISIBLE) - protocol of a feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial. Analysis of risk factors for primary non-central malposition of peripherally inserted central catheter tip in neonates with different diseases admitted to neonatal surgical department: a case-control study. Providing care to domestically sex trafficked persons in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol. Electrical Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens for Severe, Refractory Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children (EASE-SIB): protocol for a randomised double-blinded crossover trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1