输精管结扎术的技术、恢复和并发症的比较:提示和技巧。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY International Journal of Impotence Research Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5
Joseph A Borrell, Catherine Gu, Nancy Ye, Jesse N Mills, Juan J Andino
{"title":"输精管结扎术的技术、恢复和并发症的比较:提示和技巧。","authors":"Joseph A Borrell, Catherine Gu, Nancy Ye, Jesse N Mills, Juan J Andino","doi":"10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vasectomies are safe and effective, achieving up to 99.7% in sterilization, with complication rates around 1-2%. As vasectomy uptake rises, physicians should stay informed about counseling, isolation and occlusion techniques, post-op recovery, and associated risks and complications. Historically, pre-vasectomy counseling has been performed in-person, but recent literature has shown that telehealth is a viable alternative, and a physical exam may not be necessitated. With regard to vas isolation and occlusion, current international guidelines support a minimally invasive approach such as no-scalpel vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition, as they are the most effective in achieving vasectomy success and have the lowest complication rates. After a vasectomy, patients should undergo a post-vasectomy semen analysis 8-16 weeks after the procedure to ensure severe non-motile oligozoospermia (≤100,000 non-motile sperm/mL) or azoospermia. While risks and complications from vas isolation and occlusion are rare, patients should be informed about the potential for hematomas, infections, postoperative pain, and vas recanalization. In the U.S, vasectomies have increased in utilization from previous years, likely in the setting of increased access to telehealth and restricted female reproductive access. This trend raises questions about future fertility options such as vasectomy reversals and highlights the need for informed decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Borrell, Catherine Gu, Nancy Ye, Jesse N Mills, Juan J Andino\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vasectomies are safe and effective, achieving up to 99.7% in sterilization, with complication rates around 1-2%. As vasectomy uptake rises, physicians should stay informed about counseling, isolation and occlusion techniques, post-op recovery, and associated risks and complications. Historically, pre-vasectomy counseling has been performed in-person, but recent literature has shown that telehealth is a viable alternative, and a physical exam may not be necessitated. With regard to vas isolation and occlusion, current international guidelines support a minimally invasive approach such as no-scalpel vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition, as they are the most effective in achieving vasectomy success and have the lowest complication rates. After a vasectomy, patients should undergo a post-vasectomy semen analysis 8-16 weeks after the procedure to ensure severe non-motile oligozoospermia (≤100,000 non-motile sperm/mL) or azoospermia. While risks and complications from vas isolation and occlusion are rare, patients should be informed about the potential for hematomas, infections, postoperative pain, and vas recanalization. In the U.S, vasectomies have increased in utilization from previous years, likely in the setting of increased access to telehealth and restricted female reproductive access. This trend raises questions about future fertility options such as vasectomy reversals and highlights the need for informed decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impotence Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impotence Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01018-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

输精管切除术是安全有效的,绝育率高达99.7%,并发症发生率约为1-2%。随着输精管结扎术应用的增加,医生应该了解咨询、隔离和闭塞技术、术后恢复以及相关的风险和并发症。从历史上看,输精管结扎前的咨询是亲自进行的,但最近的文献表明,远程医疗是一个可行的选择,身体检查可能没有必要。关于输精管隔离和闭塞,目前的国际指南支持微创入路,如无刀输精管结扎术加粘膜烧刀和筋膜介入,因为它们是获得输精管结扎成功的最有效方法,并发症发生率最低。输精管切除术后,患者应在手术后8-16周进行输精管切除术后精液分析,以确定严重的非活动性少精子症(≤100,000个非活动精子/mL)或无精子症。虽然输精管隔离和闭塞的风险和并发症很少见,但应告知患者血肿、感染、术后疼痛和输精管再通的可能性。在美国,输精管结扎术的使用率较前几年有所增加,这可能是由于远程医疗服务的增加和女性生殖机会的限制。这一趋势提出了未来生育选择的问题,如输精管切除术逆转,并强调了知情决策的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing vasectomy techniques, recovery and complications: tips and tricks.

Vasectomies are safe and effective, achieving up to 99.7% in sterilization, with complication rates around 1-2%. As vasectomy uptake rises, physicians should stay informed about counseling, isolation and occlusion techniques, post-op recovery, and associated risks and complications. Historically, pre-vasectomy counseling has been performed in-person, but recent literature has shown that telehealth is a viable alternative, and a physical exam may not be necessitated. With regard to vas isolation and occlusion, current international guidelines support a minimally invasive approach such as no-scalpel vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition, as they are the most effective in achieving vasectomy success and have the lowest complication rates. After a vasectomy, patients should undergo a post-vasectomy semen analysis 8-16 weeks after the procedure to ensure severe non-motile oligozoospermia (≤100,000 non-motile sperm/mL) or azoospermia. While risks and complications from vas isolation and occlusion are rare, patients should be informed about the potential for hematomas, infections, postoperative pain, and vas recanalization. In the U.S, vasectomies have increased in utilization from previous years, likely in the setting of increased access to telehealth and restricted female reproductive access. This trend raises questions about future fertility options such as vasectomy reversals and highlights the need for informed decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Impotence Research
International Journal of Impotence Research 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
19.20%
发文量
140
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Association between serum vitamin D and sex hormones in women: a cross-sectional analysis using NHANES Data (2021-2023). Endocrine-metabolic crosstalk in erectile dysfunction: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications. Penile prosthesis implantation for patients with comorbid severe premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction: a pilot cohort study. Comment on: Meeting the growing demand: an operational blueprint for a 1500-case-per-year penile implant center of excellence. Quality and readability of online penile-cancer information: a Cross-Sectional Web Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1