产前补充多种微量营养素和少量以脂质为基础的营养素对低收入和中等收入国家小型脆弱新生儿类型的影响:个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Lancet Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00449-2
Dongqing Wang, Enju Liu, Nandita Perumal, Uttara Partap, Ilana R Cliffer, Janaína Calu Costa, Molin Wang, Wafaie W Fawzi
{"title":"产前补充多种微量营养素和少量以脂质为基础的营养素对低收入和中等收入国家小型脆弱新生儿类型的影响:个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。","authors":"Dongqing Wang, Enju Liu, Nandita Perumal, Uttara Partap, Ilana R Cliffer, Janaína Calu Costa, Molin Wang, Wafaie W Fawzi","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00449-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small vulnerable newborn types, defined by combinations of being born too soon or too small, have distinct determinants and health consequences. We aimed to assess the effects of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation (SQ-LNS) on small vulnerable newborn types, which are currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this meta-analysis, individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of MMS and randomised controlled trials of SQ-LNS in low-income and middle-income countries were used. We systematically searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomised controlled trials of prenatal nutritional supplementation using MMS or SQ-LNS among pregnant people published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2021. Studies were excluded if they were conducted exclusively among participants selected by pre-existing health conditions, such as anaemia status, HIV infection, or diabetes. We contacted the corresponding authors of all identified studies to seek data contribution. As individual participant data became available, we mapped relevant variables and harmonised the data across studies. Iron and folic acid supplementation was the control group in most studies. Newborns were classified into ten groups through the combinations of preterm or term birth, small, appropriate, and large for gestational age, and low birthweight (LBW) or non-LBW. Newborns were also analysed using a four-group categorisation of preterm or term and LBW or non-LBW. Log-binomial models were used to estimate study-specific risk ratios (RRs), which were pooled using meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>14 randomised controlled trials of MMS (n=42 618; the mean maternal age at study enrolment was 24·3 years [SD 5.6]; 22 086 [51·8%] male neonates and 20 532 [48·2%] female neonates) and four randomised controlled trials of SQ-LNS (n=6246; the mean maternal age at study enrolment was 23·3 years [SD 5·3]; 3137 [50·2%] male neonates and 3109 [49·8%] female neonates) were used. In the ten-group categorisation of small vulnerable newborns, prenatal MMS reduced the risk of preterm-small for gestational age (SGA)-LBW (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·64-0·84; p=0·0003); preterm-appropriate for gestational age (AGA)-LBW (0·82, 0·74-0·91; p=0·0010); preterm-AGA-non-LBW (0·89, 0·80-0·98; p=0·019); term-SGA-LBW (0·91, 0·85-0·96; p=0·0046); and term-SGA-non-LBW (0·95, 0·90-1·00; p=0·050). In the four-group categorisation, prenatal MMS reduced the risk of preterm-SGA (0·71, 0·62-0·82; p=0·0002) and term-SGA (0·93, 0·89-0·98; p=0·0066). Prenatal SQ-LNS had no significant effects on the risk of giving birth to small vulnerable newborns except for preterm-large for gestational age-non-LBW in the ten-group categorisation (0·78, 0·65-0·94; p=0·023).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Prenatal MMS and SQ-LNS reduce the risk of giving birth to small vulnerable newborns to varying extents, with the greatest magnitude of effects observed for small vulnerable newborn types that confer the greatest neonatal mortality risk. This study underscores the importance of nutritional supplements in prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 2","pages":"e298-e308"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation on small vulnerable newborn types in low-income and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.\",\"authors\":\"Dongqing Wang, Enju Liu, Nandita Perumal, Uttara Partap, Ilana R Cliffer, Janaína Calu Costa, Molin Wang, Wafaie W Fawzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00449-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small vulnerable newborn types, defined by combinations of being born too soon or too small, have distinct determinants and health consequences. We aimed to assess the effects of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation (SQ-LNS) on small vulnerable newborn types, which are currently unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this meta-analysis, individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of MMS and randomised controlled trials of SQ-LNS in low-income and middle-income countries were used. We systematically searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomised controlled trials of prenatal nutritional supplementation using MMS or SQ-LNS among pregnant people published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2021. Studies were excluded if they were conducted exclusively among participants selected by pre-existing health conditions, such as anaemia status, HIV infection, or diabetes. We contacted the corresponding authors of all identified studies to seek data contribution. As individual participant data became available, we mapped relevant variables and harmonised the data across studies. Iron and folic acid supplementation was the control group in most studies. Newborns were classified into ten groups through the combinations of preterm or term birth, small, appropriate, and large for gestational age, and low birthweight (LBW) or non-LBW. Newborns were also analysed using a four-group categorisation of preterm or term and LBW or non-LBW. Log-binomial models were used to estimate study-specific risk ratios (RRs), which were pooled using meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>14 randomised controlled trials of MMS (n=42 618; the mean maternal age at study enrolment was 24·3 years [SD 5.6]; 22 086 [51·8%] male neonates and 20 532 [48·2%] female neonates) and four randomised controlled trials of SQ-LNS (n=6246; the mean maternal age at study enrolment was 23·3 years [SD 5·3]; 3137 [50·2%] male neonates and 3109 [49·8%] female neonates) were used. In the ten-group categorisation of small vulnerable newborns, prenatal MMS reduced the risk of preterm-small for gestational age (SGA)-LBW (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·64-0·84; p=0·0003); preterm-appropriate for gestational age (AGA)-LBW (0·82, 0·74-0·91; p=0·0010); preterm-AGA-non-LBW (0·89, 0·80-0·98; p=0·019); term-SGA-LBW (0·91, 0·85-0·96; p=0·0046); and term-SGA-non-LBW (0·95, 0·90-1·00; p=0·050). In the four-group categorisation, prenatal MMS reduced the risk of preterm-SGA (0·71, 0·62-0·82; p=0·0002) and term-SGA (0·93, 0·89-0·98; p=0·0066). Prenatal SQ-LNS had no significant effects on the risk of giving birth to small vulnerable newborns except for preterm-large for gestational age-non-LBW in the ten-group categorisation (0·78, 0·65-0·94; p=0·023).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Prenatal MMS and SQ-LNS reduce the risk of giving birth to small vulnerable newborns to varying extents, with the greatest magnitude of effects observed for small vulnerable newborn types that confer the greatest neonatal mortality risk. This study underscores the importance of nutritional supplements in prenatal care.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Global Health\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"e298-e308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00449-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00449-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由出生太早或太小的组合定义的脆弱新生儿类型具有明显的决定因素和健康后果。我们的目的是评估产前多种微量营养素补充(MMS)和小量脂质营养补充(SQ-LNS)对小易感新生儿类型的影响,目前尚不清楚。方法:在本荟萃分析中,使用来自低收入和中等收入国家MMS随机对照试验和SQ-LNS随机对照试验的个体参与者数据。我们系统地检索了PubMed、Embase和Web of Science的文献,以确定在2000年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间发表的孕妇中使用MMS或SQ-LNS进行产前营养补充的随机对照试验。如果研究仅在根据既往健康状况(如贫血状况、艾滋病毒感染或糖尿病)选择的参与者中进行,则排除研究。我们联系了所有确定的研究的通讯作者,以寻求数据贡献。随着个体参与者数据的可用性,我们绘制了相关变量图,并协调了研究中的数据。在大多数研究中,铁和叶酸的补充是对照组。根据早产或足月、胎龄小、适宜、大、低出生体重(LBW)或非LBW的组合将新生儿分为10组。新生儿也被分析使用四组分类早产儿或足月和低体重或非低体重。使用对数二项模型估计研究特定风险比(rr),并使用荟萃分析汇总。结果:14项MMS随机对照试验(n=42 618;入组时母亲的平均年龄为24.3岁[SD 5.6];22 086例[51.8%]男性新生儿和20 532例[48.2%]女性新生儿)和4项SQ-LNS随机对照试验(n=6246;产妇入组时的平均年龄为23.3岁[SD 5.3];男婴3137例(50.2%),女婴3109例(49.8%)。在小易感新生儿的十组分类中,产前MMS降低了早产风险-小于胎龄(SGA)-LBW (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64 - 0.84;p = 0·0003);早产儿-适宜胎龄(AGA)-LBW (0.82, 0.74 - 0.91);p = 0·0010);preterm-AGA-non-LBW (0.89, 0.80 - 0.98;p = 0·019);term-SGA-LBW (0.91, 0.85 - 0.96;p = 0·0046);term-SGA-non-LBW(0.95, 0.90 -1·00;p = 0·050)。在四组分类中,产前MMS降低了早产儿- sga (0.71, 0.62 - 0.82; p= 0.0002)和足月- sga (0.93, 0.89 - 0.98;p = 0·0066)。产前SQ-LNS对出生小易感新生儿的风险没有显著影响,除了胎龄大的早产儿和非lbw在10组分类中(0.78,0.65 - 0.94;p = 0·023)。解释:产前MMS和SQ-LNS在不同程度上降低了出生易感小新生儿的风险,对易感小新生儿类型的影响最大,新生儿死亡风险最大。这项研究强调了营养补充剂在产前护理中的重要性。资助:比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation on small vulnerable newborn types in low-income and middle-income countries: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Background: Small vulnerable newborn types, defined by combinations of being born too soon or too small, have distinct determinants and health consequences. We aimed to assess the effects of prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation (MMS) and small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation (SQ-LNS) on small vulnerable newborn types, which are currently unknown.

Methods: In this meta-analysis, individual participant data from randomised controlled trials of MMS and randomised controlled trials of SQ-LNS in low-income and middle-income countries were used. We systematically searched the literature using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify randomised controlled trials of prenatal nutritional supplementation using MMS or SQ-LNS among pregnant people published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2021. Studies were excluded if they were conducted exclusively among participants selected by pre-existing health conditions, such as anaemia status, HIV infection, or diabetes. We contacted the corresponding authors of all identified studies to seek data contribution. As individual participant data became available, we mapped relevant variables and harmonised the data across studies. Iron and folic acid supplementation was the control group in most studies. Newborns were classified into ten groups through the combinations of preterm or term birth, small, appropriate, and large for gestational age, and low birthweight (LBW) or non-LBW. Newborns were also analysed using a four-group categorisation of preterm or term and LBW or non-LBW. Log-binomial models were used to estimate study-specific risk ratios (RRs), which were pooled using meta-analyses.

Findings: 14 randomised controlled trials of MMS (n=42 618; the mean maternal age at study enrolment was 24·3 years [SD 5.6]; 22 086 [51·8%] male neonates and 20 532 [48·2%] female neonates) and four randomised controlled trials of SQ-LNS (n=6246; the mean maternal age at study enrolment was 23·3 years [SD 5·3]; 3137 [50·2%] male neonates and 3109 [49·8%] female neonates) were used. In the ten-group categorisation of small vulnerable newborns, prenatal MMS reduced the risk of preterm-small for gestational age (SGA)-LBW (RR 0·73, 95% CI 0·64-0·84; p=0·0003); preterm-appropriate for gestational age (AGA)-LBW (0·82, 0·74-0·91; p=0·0010); preterm-AGA-non-LBW (0·89, 0·80-0·98; p=0·019); term-SGA-LBW (0·91, 0·85-0·96; p=0·0046); and term-SGA-non-LBW (0·95, 0·90-1·00; p=0·050). In the four-group categorisation, prenatal MMS reduced the risk of preterm-SGA (0·71, 0·62-0·82; p=0·0002) and term-SGA (0·93, 0·89-0·98; p=0·0066). Prenatal SQ-LNS had no significant effects on the risk of giving birth to small vulnerable newborns except for preterm-large for gestational age-non-LBW in the ten-group categorisation (0·78, 0·65-0·94; p=0·023).

Interpretation: Prenatal MMS and SQ-LNS reduce the risk of giving birth to small vulnerable newborns to varying extents, with the greatest magnitude of effects observed for small vulnerable newborn types that confer the greatest neonatal mortality risk. This study underscores the importance of nutritional supplements in prenatal care.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
期刊最新文献
The fascinating malaria-COVID-19 relationship. Integrating support for caregiver mental health into health and social systems. Co-design measurement: building from progress already made. Burden of 292 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in Iran, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Impact of the UNICEF Caring for the Caregiver intervention on mental health, social support, and parenting stress: a six-country pre-post evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1