使用人工智能辅助肺癌的诊断——一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.8 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiography Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.011
J.R. Tugwell-Allsup , B.W. Owen , R. Hibbs , A. England
{"title":"使用人工智能辅助肺癌的诊断——一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"J.R. Tugwell-Allsup ,&nbsp;B.W. Owen ,&nbsp;R. Hibbs ,&nbsp;A. England","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>AI software in the form of deep learning–based automatic detection (DLAD) algorithms for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation have shown success in early detection of lung cancer (LC), however, there remains uncertainty related to clinical validation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CXRs and their corresponding chest-CT scans were retrospectively collated from a single institution between January 2019–2020. A commercially available AI software was used to evaluate 320 CXRs (&lt;6 years prior-to-diagnosis) from 105 positive LC patients and 103 negative controls. Clinical reports were extracted and coded to correlate against AI findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 105 LC patients, (57[55 %] men, median [IQR] age 73[68–83] years), clinical reports identified LC in 64 (61 %) whereas AI identified LC in 95 (90 %). AI diagnostic (image-level) and prognostic (patient-level) sensitivities were 57.6 % and 90.0 %, (81 % in correct location), respectively. On CXRs performed &gt;12 months prior to LC diagnosis, the AI detected nodules in 24(23 %) cases of which 22/24 had negative clinical reports for lung nodule/mass. The potential median reduction in time-to-diagnosis for cases where AI identified nodule(s) on previous CXR, but clinical reports negative, was 193[IQR 42–598] days. Of the 103 ‘negative’ controls (48[47 %] men, median [IQR] age 69[61–77] years) 20 patients had a nodule abnormality score above the threshold, generating a false-positive rate of 19 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI software showed excellent performance in detecting LCs that initially went undetected on CXR. The algorithm has potential to increase LC detection rates and reduce time-to-diagnosis. Using the AI, in conjunction with a trained observer, could increase reporting accuracy and potentially improve clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study demonstrated the benefits and pitfalls associated with using AI in a clinical setting. It provides further evidence for utilising decision-support aids within clinical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 102876"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of artificial intelligence to aid the diagnosis of lung cancer – A retrospective-cohort study\",\"authors\":\"J.R. Tugwell-Allsup ,&nbsp;B.W. Owen ,&nbsp;R. Hibbs ,&nbsp;A. England\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>AI software in the form of deep learning–based automatic detection (DLAD) algorithms for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation have shown success in early detection of lung cancer (LC), however, there remains uncertainty related to clinical validation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CXRs and their corresponding chest-CT scans were retrospectively collated from a single institution between January 2019–2020. A commercially available AI software was used to evaluate 320 CXRs (&lt;6 years prior-to-diagnosis) from 105 positive LC patients and 103 negative controls. Clinical reports were extracted and coded to correlate against AI findings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 105 LC patients, (57[55 %] men, median [IQR] age 73[68–83] years), clinical reports identified LC in 64 (61 %) whereas AI identified LC in 95 (90 %). AI diagnostic (image-level) and prognostic (patient-level) sensitivities were 57.6 % and 90.0 %, (81 % in correct location), respectively. On CXRs performed &gt;12 months prior to LC diagnosis, the AI detected nodules in 24(23 %) cases of which 22/24 had negative clinical reports for lung nodule/mass. The potential median reduction in time-to-diagnosis for cases where AI identified nodule(s) on previous CXR, but clinical reports negative, was 193[IQR 42–598] days. Of the 103 ‘negative’ controls (48[47 %] men, median [IQR] age 69[61–77] years) 20 patients had a nodule abnormality score above the threshold, generating a false-positive rate of 19 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The AI software showed excellent performance in detecting LCs that initially went undetected on CXR. The algorithm has potential to increase LC detection rates and reduce time-to-diagnosis. Using the AI, in conjunction with a trained observer, could increase reporting accuracy and potentially improve clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>This study demonstrated the benefits and pitfalls associated with using AI in a clinical setting. It provides further evidence for utilising decision-support aids within clinical practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:基于深度学习的自动检测(DLAD)算法形式的人工智能软件用于胸部x射线(CXR)解释已经在肺癌(LC)的早期检测中取得了成功,然而,与临床验证相关的不确定性仍然存在。方法:回顾性整理2019年1月至2020年1月间同一家机构的cxr及其相应的胸部ct扫描。一款市售AI软件用于评估320例cxr(结果:105例LC患者中,57例[55%]男性,中位[IQR]年龄73[68-83]岁),临床报告发现64例(61%)LC,而AI发现95例(90%)LC。人工智能诊断(图像水平)和预后(患者水平)的敏感性分别为57.6%和90.0%(正确定位81%)。在LC诊断前12个月进行的cxr中,AI在24例(23%)中检测到结节,其中22/24的临床报告为肺结节/肿块阴性。在先前的CXR中人工智能识别出结节,但临床报告阴性的病例,诊断时间的中位数减少可能为193[IQR 42-598]天。103例阴性对照(48例[47%]男性,中位[IQR]年龄69[61-77]岁)中,20例结节异常评分高于阈值,假阳性率为19%。结论:人工智能软件在检测CXR中未被发现的lccs方面表现出优异的性能。该算法具有提高LC检测率和缩短诊断时间的潜力。与训练有素的观察员一起使用人工智能可以提高报告的准确性,并有可能改善临床结果。实践意义:本研究展示了在临床环境中使用人工智能的好处和缺陷。它为在临床实践中使用决策支持辅助工具提供了进一步的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The use of artificial intelligence to aid the diagnosis of lung cancer – A retrospective-cohort study

Introduction

AI software in the form of deep learning–based automatic detection (DLAD) algorithms for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation have shown success in early detection of lung cancer (LC), however, there remains uncertainty related to clinical validation.

Methods

CXRs and their corresponding chest-CT scans were retrospectively collated from a single institution between January 2019–2020. A commercially available AI software was used to evaluate 320 CXRs (<6 years prior-to-diagnosis) from 105 positive LC patients and 103 negative controls. Clinical reports were extracted and coded to correlate against AI findings.

Results

Of 105 LC patients, (57[55 %] men, median [IQR] age 73[68–83] years), clinical reports identified LC in 64 (61 %) whereas AI identified LC in 95 (90 %). AI diagnostic (image-level) and prognostic (patient-level) sensitivities were 57.6 % and 90.0 %, (81 % in correct location), respectively. On CXRs performed >12 months prior to LC diagnosis, the AI detected nodules in 24(23 %) cases of which 22/24 had negative clinical reports for lung nodule/mass. The potential median reduction in time-to-diagnosis for cases where AI identified nodule(s) on previous CXR, but clinical reports negative, was 193[IQR 42–598] days. Of the 103 ‘negative’ controls (48[47 %] men, median [IQR] age 69[61–77] years) 20 patients had a nodule abnormality score above the threshold, generating a false-positive rate of 19 %.

Conclusion

The AI software showed excellent performance in detecting LCs that initially went undetected on CXR. The algorithm has potential to increase LC detection rates and reduce time-to-diagnosis. Using the AI, in conjunction with a trained observer, could increase reporting accuracy and potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Implications for practice

This study demonstrated the benefits and pitfalls associated with using AI in a clinical setting. It provides further evidence for utilising decision-support aids within clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
期刊最新文献
Exploring radiography students’ preparedness and emotional responses to trauma radiography case exposure during clinical placements Measuring AI preparedness in health professions education: Evidence from a national survey of medical radiation science students and new graduates Professional identity satisfaction among radiotherapy technologists and medical physicists in Morocco: A cross-sectional survey Exploring how research skills are taught and assessed in medical imaging and radiation therapy higher education: An international snapshot Bullying and harassment experiences among radiographers: A transnational scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1