糖尿病患病率与周末战士活动模式之间的关系。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.016
Zihao Chen , Junqiang Jia , Jiayuan Tu , Yuehui Zhao , Xiaoming Li
{"title":"糖尿病患病率与周末战士活动模式之间的关系。","authors":"Zihao Chen ,&nbsp;Junqiang Jia ,&nbsp;Jiayuan Tu ,&nbsp;Yuehui Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the association between the Weekend Warrior (WW) pattern and diabetes prevalence in American adults.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2007–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined the relationship between four physical activity (PA) patterns—inactive, insufficiently active, WW, and regularly active—and diabetes prevalence. Multivariable logistic regression, marginal average population effects (MAPE), subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess these associations. Odds ratios (ORs) and average marginal effects (AME), along with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals engaging in the WW pattern (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.40 to 0.89, <em>p</em> = 0.013; AME = −0.05, 95 % CI: -0.09 to −0.02, <em>p</em> = 0.004) and the regularly active pattern (OR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.60 to 0.80, p &lt; 0.001; AME = −0.04, 95 % CI: -0.06 to −0.03, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) showed significantly lower diabetes prevalence than those classified as inactive. Compared to individuals classified as inactive, those categorized as insufficiently active demonstrated no significant difference in diabetes prevalence. No significant difference was observed between the WW and regularly active patterns (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 1.35, <em>p</em> = 0.5; AME = −0.01, 95 % CI: -0.06 to 0.03, <em>p</em> = 0.501). Subgroup interaction analyses revealed no significant effect modification (all <em>p</em> for interaction &gt;0.05), and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the WW and regularly active patterns are associated with a lower prevalence of diabetes compared with inactive individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"240 ","pages":"Pages 97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between diabetes prevalence and weekend warrior activity patterns\",\"authors\":\"Zihao Chen ,&nbsp;Junqiang Jia ,&nbsp;Jiayuan Tu ,&nbsp;Yuehui Zhao ,&nbsp;Xiaoming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the association between the Weekend Warrior (WW) pattern and diabetes prevalence in American adults.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2007–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined the relationship between four physical activity (PA) patterns—inactive, insufficiently active, WW, and regularly active—and diabetes prevalence. Multivariable logistic regression, marginal average population effects (MAPE), subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess these associations. Odds ratios (ORs) and average marginal effects (AME), along with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals engaging in the WW pattern (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.40 to 0.89, <em>p</em> = 0.013; AME = −0.05, 95 % CI: -0.09 to −0.02, <em>p</em> = 0.004) and the regularly active pattern (OR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.60 to 0.80, p &lt; 0.001; AME = −0.04, 95 % CI: -0.06 to −0.03, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) showed significantly lower diabetes prevalence than those classified as inactive. Compared to individuals classified as inactive, those categorized as insufficiently active demonstrated no significant difference in diabetes prevalence. No significant difference was observed between the WW and regularly active patterns (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 1.35, <em>p</em> = 0.5; AME = −0.01, 95 % CI: -0.06 to 0.03, <em>p</em> = 0.501). Subgroup interaction analyses revealed no significant effect modification (all <em>p</em> for interaction &gt;0.05), and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both the WW and regularly active patterns are associated with a lower prevalence of diabetes compared with inactive individuals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health\",\"volume\":\"240 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500037X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003335062500037X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨周末战士(WW)模式与美国成年人糖尿病患病率的关系。研究设计:对2007-2016年全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据进行横断面分析。方法:我们研究了四种体育活动(PA)模式——不运动、不充分运动、WW和定期运动——与糖尿病患病率之间的关系。采用多变量逻辑回归、边际平均群体效应(MAPE)、亚组和敏感性分析来评估这些关联。计算优势比(ORs)和平均边际效应(AME),以及95%置信区间(ci)。结果:参与WW模式的个体(OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40 ~ 0.89, p = 0.013;AME = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.09至-0.02,p = 0.004)和规律活动模式(OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60至0.80,p 0.05),敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。结论:与不运动的个体相比,WW和有规律的运动模式与较低的糖尿病患病率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between diabetes prevalence and weekend warrior activity patterns

Objective

To investigate the association between the Weekend Warrior (WW) pattern and diabetes prevalence in American adults.

Study design

Cross-sectional analysis of data from the 2007–2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Methods

We examined the relationship between four physical activity (PA) patterns—inactive, insufficiently active, WW, and regularly active—and diabetes prevalence. Multivariable logistic regression, marginal average population effects (MAPE), subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess these associations. Odds ratios (ORs) and average marginal effects (AME), along with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

Individuals engaging in the WW pattern (OR = 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.40 to 0.89, p = 0.013; AME = −0.05, 95 % CI: -0.09 to −0.02, p = 0.004) and the regularly active pattern (OR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.60 to 0.80, p < 0.001; AME = −0.04, 95 % CI: -0.06 to −0.03, p < 0.001) showed significantly lower diabetes prevalence than those classified as inactive. Compared to individuals classified as inactive, those categorized as insufficiently active demonstrated no significant difference in diabetes prevalence. No significant difference was observed between the WW and regularly active patterns (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 1.35, p = 0.5; AME = −0.01, 95 % CI: -0.06 to 0.03, p = 0.501). Subgroup interaction analyses revealed no significant effect modification (all p for interaction >0.05), and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

Conclusion

Both the WW and regularly active patterns are associated with a lower prevalence of diabetes compared with inactive individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
期刊最新文献
Acute symptoms and subsequent post-acute symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination: A Danish population-based study Integrating vaccination into strategies to protect people living with noncommunicable diseases Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic Exercise Benefits/Barriers Scale (Ar-EBBS) in Saudi adults: Reliability, validity, and implications for physical activity promotion Effects of social norms vs health claims on purchasing behaviour: Reducing high-salt foods and promoting fruit and vegetables Comment on ‘Relationship between mindfulness and eHealth literacy: A cross-sectional study using validated scales’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1