已故供者肾移植决策的动态:来自研究个体临床医生提供决策的见解。

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040
Ellen Green , E. Glenn Dutcher , Jesse D. Schold , Darren Stewart
{"title":"已故供者肾移植决策的动态:来自研究个体临床医生提供决策的见解。","authors":"Ellen Green ,&nbsp;E. Glenn Dutcher ,&nbsp;Jesse D. Schold ,&nbsp;Darren Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the high demand, &gt;7500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians vs centers and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (from January 2016 to December 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level data set with 344 678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians vs centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed-effect logistic regression models. To complement kidney donor profile index as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated expected acceptance probability, adjusting for a broader set of donor characteristics and recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level (0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) variances were significant, with heterogeneity in the kidney donor profile index–acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 7","pages":"Pages 1471-1480"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dynamics of deceased donor kidney transplant decision making: insights from studying individual clinicians’ offer decisions\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Green ,&nbsp;E. Glenn Dutcher ,&nbsp;Jesse D. Schold ,&nbsp;Darren Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite the high demand, &gt;7500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians vs centers and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (from January 2016 to December 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level data set with 344 678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians vs centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed-effect logistic regression models. To complement kidney donor profile index as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated expected acceptance probability, adjusting for a broader set of donor characteristics and recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level (0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) variances were significant, with heterogeneity in the kidney donor profile index–acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1471-1480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525000462\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613525000462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管需求量很大,但每年仍有超过7500个回收的肾脏未被使用,移植中心在接受报价方面表现出很大的差异。然而,目前尚不清楚这种差异在同一中心的个体临床医生之间发生了多少,以及它对分配效率和公平性的影响。本研究量化了临床医生与进入者在肾供体接受决定上的差异,并检查了供体质量在接受决定中的作用。我们分析了全国移植登记数据(2016年1月至12月)。2020年)与来自15个移植中心的随叫随到记录相关联,创建了一个临床级别的数据集,其中包含344,678名已故捐赠者提供的肾脏。主要结果是临床医生与医疗中心在接受治疗方面的可变性,通过分层、混合效应逻辑回归模型进行量化。为了补充KDPI作为捐赠者质量的衡量标准,我们纳入了预期接受概率(EAP),它根据更广泛的捐赠者特征和接受者因素进行调整。中心水平(0.35,95% CI: 0.15-0.79)和临床水平方差(0.10,95% CI: 0.06-0.18)均显著,临床医生之间kdpi接受相关性存在异质性。这些结果强调需要进一步研究驱动临床水平差异的机制及其对器官分配有效性、公平性和患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The dynamics of deceased donor kidney transplant decision making: insights from studying individual clinicians’ offer decisions
Despite the high demand, >7500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians vs centers and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (from January 2016 to December 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level data set with 344 678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians vs centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed-effect logistic regression models. To complement kidney donor profile index as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated expected acceptance probability, adjusting for a broader set of donor characteristics and recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level (0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) variances were significant, with heterogeneity in the kidney donor profile index–acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
Pre-Transplant Circulating cTfh17 and Donor-Reactive T Follicular Helper Responses Distinguish Liver Transplant Recipients Who Develop Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury and Donor-Specific Antibody. Clazakizumab in the treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated kidney transplant rejection: Results from the IMAGINE phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Donor-Derived West Nile Virus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients, France, 2025 A comparative analysis of acellular versus red cell based subnormothermic machine perfusion in human kidney transplantation Does the Kidney allograft serve as an in-vivo flow cytometer? The answer, my friend, is flowin' in the urine (with apologies to Bob Dylan).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1