为公平地减少博茨瓦纳、印度、肯尼亚和尼泊尔眼科筛查项目的缺勤率,对服务用户衍生干预措施进行适应性平台试验的方案。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085353
Luke Allen, Min Kim, Malebogo Tlhajoane, David Macleod, Oathokwa Nkomazana, Michael Gichangi, Sailesh Mishra, Shalinder Sabherwal, James R Carpenter, Sarah Karanja, Ari Ho-Foster, Bakgaki Ratshaa, Nigel Bolster, Jacqueline Ramke, Matthew J Burton, Andrew Bastawrous
{"title":"为公平地减少博茨瓦纳、印度、肯尼亚和尼泊尔眼科筛查项目的缺勤率,对服务用户衍生干预措施进行适应性平台试验的方案。","authors":"Luke Allen, Min Kim, Malebogo Tlhajoane, David Macleod, Oathokwa Nkomazana, Michael Gichangi, Sailesh Mishra, Shalinder Sabherwal, James R Carpenter, Sarah Karanja, Ari Ho-Foster, Bakgaki Ratshaa, Nigel Bolster, Jacqueline Ramke, Matthew J Burton, Andrew Bastawrous","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Only 30%-50% of people referred to clinics during community-based eye screening are able to access care in Botswana, India, Kenya and Nepal. The access rate is even lower for certain population groups. This platform trial aims to test multiple, iterative, low-risk public health interventions and simple service modifications with a series of individual randomised controlled trials (RCT) conducted in each country, with the aim of increasing the proportion of people attending.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will set up a platform trial in each country to govern the running of a series of pragmatic, adaptive, embedded, parallel, multiarm, superiority RCTs to test a series of service modifications suggested by intended service users. The aim is to identify serial marginal gains that cumulatively result in large improvements to equity and access. The primary outcome will be the probability of accessing treatment among the population group with the worst access at baseline. We will calculate Bayesian posterior probabilities of clinic attendance in each arm every 72 hours. Each RCT will continually recruit participants until the following default stopping rules have been met: >95% probability that one arm is best; >95% probability that the difference between the best arm and the arms remaining in the trial is <1%; or 10 000 people have been recruited. Lower thresholds may be used for RCTs testing interventions with very low risks and costs. The specific design of cluster RCTs will be determined by our research team once the intervention is known, but the population and outcome will be the same across all trials.This adaptive platform trial will be used to identify effective service modifications, driving continuous improvements in access.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This trial has been approved by the research ethics committee at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (ref: 29549). Approvals for individual interventions will be sought from UK and local ethics committees. Results will be shared via local workshops, social media and peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN53970958.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e085353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792273/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protocol for an adaptive platform trial of intended service user-derived interventions to equitably reduce non-attendance in eye screening programmes in Botswana, India, Kenya and Nepal.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Allen, Min Kim, Malebogo Tlhajoane, David Macleod, Oathokwa Nkomazana, Michael Gichangi, Sailesh Mishra, Shalinder Sabherwal, James R Carpenter, Sarah Karanja, Ari Ho-Foster, Bakgaki Ratshaa, Nigel Bolster, Jacqueline Ramke, Matthew J Burton, Andrew Bastawrous\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Only 30%-50% of people referred to clinics during community-based eye screening are able to access care in Botswana, India, Kenya and Nepal. The access rate is even lower for certain population groups. This platform trial aims to test multiple, iterative, low-risk public health interventions and simple service modifications with a series of individual randomised controlled trials (RCT) conducted in each country, with the aim of increasing the proportion of people attending.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will set up a platform trial in each country to govern the running of a series of pragmatic, adaptive, embedded, parallel, multiarm, superiority RCTs to test a series of service modifications suggested by intended service users. The aim is to identify serial marginal gains that cumulatively result in large improvements to equity and access. The primary outcome will be the probability of accessing treatment among the population group with the worst access at baseline. We will calculate Bayesian posterior probabilities of clinic attendance in each arm every 72 hours. Each RCT will continually recruit participants until the following default stopping rules have been met: >95% probability that one arm is best; >95% probability that the difference between the best arm and the arms remaining in the trial is <1%; or 10 000 people have been recruited. Lower thresholds may be used for RCTs testing interventions with very low risks and costs. The specific design of cluster RCTs will be determined by our research team once the intervention is known, but the population and outcome will be the same across all trials.This adaptive platform trial will be used to identify effective service modifications, driving continuous improvements in access.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This trial has been approved by the research ethics committee at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (ref: 29549). Approvals for individual interventions will be sought from UK and local ethics committees. Results will be shared via local workshops, social media and peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN53970958.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"e085353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11792273/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在博茨瓦纳、印度、肯尼亚和尼泊尔,在社区眼科筛查期间转诊到诊所的患者中,只有30%-50%能够获得护理。某些人群的入学率甚至更低。该平台试验旨在通过在每个国家进行的一系列个体随机对照试验(RCT),测试多种、反复的低风险公共卫生干预措施和简单的服务修改,目的是增加参加试验的人数比例。方法与分析:我们将在每个国家建立一个平台试验,以管理一系列实用、自适应、嵌入式、并行、多臂、优势随机对照试验的运行,以测试预期服务用户建议的一系列服务修改。其目的是确定一系列边际收益,这些收益累积起来会大大改善公平和获得机会。主要结果将是基线时可及性最差的人群获得治疗的概率。我们将计算每组每72小时就诊的贝叶斯后验概率。每个随机对照试验将继续招募参与者,直到满足以下默认停止规则:>95%的概率,一个组是最好的;> 95%概率之间的差异最好的胳膊,剩下的武器试验伦理和传播:这个试验研究伦理委员会批准的伦敦卫生与热带医学学院(ref: 29549)。个别干预将获得英国和当地伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将通过当地研讨会、社交媒体和同行评审出版物进行分享。试验注册号:ISRCTN53970958。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protocol for an adaptive platform trial of intended service user-derived interventions to equitably reduce non-attendance in eye screening programmes in Botswana, India, Kenya and Nepal.

Introduction: Only 30%-50% of people referred to clinics during community-based eye screening are able to access care in Botswana, India, Kenya and Nepal. The access rate is even lower for certain population groups. This platform trial aims to test multiple, iterative, low-risk public health interventions and simple service modifications with a series of individual randomised controlled trials (RCT) conducted in each country, with the aim of increasing the proportion of people attending.

Methods and analysis: We will set up a platform trial in each country to govern the running of a series of pragmatic, adaptive, embedded, parallel, multiarm, superiority RCTs to test a series of service modifications suggested by intended service users. The aim is to identify serial marginal gains that cumulatively result in large improvements to equity and access. The primary outcome will be the probability of accessing treatment among the population group with the worst access at baseline. We will calculate Bayesian posterior probabilities of clinic attendance in each arm every 72 hours. Each RCT will continually recruit participants until the following default stopping rules have been met: >95% probability that one arm is best; >95% probability that the difference between the best arm and the arms remaining in the trial is <1%; or 10 000 people have been recruited. Lower thresholds may be used for RCTs testing interventions with very low risks and costs. The specific design of cluster RCTs will be determined by our research team once the intervention is known, but the population and outcome will be the same across all trials.This adaptive platform trial will be used to identify effective service modifications, driving continuous improvements in access.

Ethics and dissemination: This trial has been approved by the research ethics committee at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (ref: 29549). Approvals for individual interventions will be sought from UK and local ethics committees. Results will be shared via local workshops, social media and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN53970958.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of suprapubic temperature stimulation for postoperative urinary retention: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Persistent increased risk of renal replacement therapy following COVID-19: a 2-year follow-up study in Japan using propensity score matching and inverse probability censoring weighting. Effects of Erbium:YAG laser combined with vaginal estriol therapy in postmenopausal women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Exploring global access to healthcare and utilisation for neurocutaneous syndromes: a scoping review protocol. Lived experiences, challenges and coping strategies of patients with spinal cord injury using intermittent catheterisation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1