James P. Hereward, Tobias J. Smith, Ros Gloag, Dean R. Brookes, Gimme H. Walter
{"title":"利用多重遗传标记重新评估澳大利亚无刺蜂的杂交。","authors":"James P. Hereward, Tobias J. Smith, Ros Gloag, Dean R. Brookes, Gimme H. Walter","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We re-examined reports of hybridisation in three cryptic stingless bee species in the genus <i>Tetragonula</i> in South East Queensland, Australia (<i>T. carbonaria</i>, <i>T. davenporti</i> and <i>T. hockingsi</i>). Previous studies on this group using microsatellite markers proposed that hybridisation occasionally takes place. In contrast, we find that using 1745 SNPs we could reliably separate the three species, with no evidence of contemporary (or recent) hybridisation. We found identical amplicon sequences of the nuclear gene <i>EF1alpha</i> across most individuals of the three species, but low and moderate species-specific polymorphisms in the nuclear gene <i>Opsin</i> and the mitochondrial <i>16S</i> rRNA gene, respectively, with no cases of mito-nuclear discordance at these genes. We confirm that nuclear divergence across these species is low, based on 10–26 kb of non-coding sequence flanking <i>EF1alpha</i> and <i>Opsin</i> (0.7%–1% pairwise difference between species). However, we find mitogenomes to be far more diverged than nuclear genomes (21.6%–23.6% pairwise difference between species). Based on these comprehensive analyses of multiple marker types, we conclude there is no ongoing gene flow among the <i>Tetragonula</i> species of South East Queensland, despite their morphological similarity to one another and the low nuclear divergence among them. The higher resolution provided by multiple SNP markers may lead to lower estimates of contemporary hybridisation more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reassessing Hybridisation in Australian Tetragonula Stingless Bees Using Multiple Genetic Markers\",\"authors\":\"James P. Hereward, Tobias J. Smith, Ros Gloag, Dean R. Brookes, Gimme H. Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.70912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We re-examined reports of hybridisation in three cryptic stingless bee species in the genus <i>Tetragonula</i> in South East Queensland, Australia (<i>T. carbonaria</i>, <i>T. davenporti</i> and <i>T. hockingsi</i>). Previous studies on this group using microsatellite markers proposed that hybridisation occasionally takes place. In contrast, we find that using 1745 SNPs we could reliably separate the three species, with no evidence of contemporary (or recent) hybridisation. We found identical amplicon sequences of the nuclear gene <i>EF1alpha</i> across most individuals of the three species, but low and moderate species-specific polymorphisms in the nuclear gene <i>Opsin</i> and the mitochondrial <i>16S</i> rRNA gene, respectively, with no cases of mito-nuclear discordance at these genes. We confirm that nuclear divergence across these species is low, based on 10–26 kb of non-coding sequence flanking <i>EF1alpha</i> and <i>Opsin</i> (0.7%–1% pairwise difference between species). However, we find mitogenomes to be far more diverged than nuclear genomes (21.6%–23.6% pairwise difference between species). Based on these comprehensive analyses of multiple marker types, we conclude there is no ongoing gene flow among the <i>Tetragonula</i> species of South East Queensland, despite their morphological similarity to one another and the low nuclear divergence among them. The higher resolution provided by multiple SNP markers may lead to lower estimates of contemporary hybridisation more generally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775563/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70912\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们重新研究了澳大利亚昆士兰东南部的三种隐形无刺蜜蜂(T. carbonaria, T. davenporti和T. hockingsi)的杂交报告。先前使用微卫星标记对这一群体进行的研究表明,杂交偶尔会发生。相比之下,我们发现使用1745个snp我们可以可靠地分离这三个物种,没有当代(或最近)杂交的证据。我们发现,在这三个物种的大多数个体中,核基因EF1alpha扩增子序列相同,但核基因Opsin和线粒体16S rRNA基因分别具有低和中等的物种特异性多态性,这些基因没有核分裂不一致的情况。基于EF1alpha和Opsin两侧10-26 kb的非编码序列,我们证实这些物种之间的核差异很低(物种之间的成对差异为0.7%-1%)。然而,我们发现有丝分裂基因组远比核基因组分化更大(物种间成对差异为21.6%-23.6%)。基于这些对多种标记类型的综合分析,我们得出结论,尽管东南昆士兰的四足动物物种之间形态相似,核分化程度低,但它们之间没有持续的基因流动。多个SNP标记提供的更高分辨率可能导致更普遍的当代杂交的较低估计。
Reassessing Hybridisation in Australian Tetragonula Stingless Bees Using Multiple Genetic Markers
We re-examined reports of hybridisation in three cryptic stingless bee species in the genus Tetragonula in South East Queensland, Australia (T. carbonaria, T. davenporti and T. hockingsi). Previous studies on this group using microsatellite markers proposed that hybridisation occasionally takes place. In contrast, we find that using 1745 SNPs we could reliably separate the three species, with no evidence of contemporary (or recent) hybridisation. We found identical amplicon sequences of the nuclear gene EF1alpha across most individuals of the three species, but low and moderate species-specific polymorphisms in the nuclear gene Opsin and the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, respectively, with no cases of mito-nuclear discordance at these genes. We confirm that nuclear divergence across these species is low, based on 10–26 kb of non-coding sequence flanking EF1alpha and Opsin (0.7%–1% pairwise difference between species). However, we find mitogenomes to be far more diverged than nuclear genomes (21.6%–23.6% pairwise difference between species). Based on these comprehensive analyses of multiple marker types, we conclude there is no ongoing gene flow among the Tetragonula species of South East Queensland, despite their morphological similarity to one another and the low nuclear divergence among them. The higher resolution provided by multiple SNP markers may lead to lower estimates of contemporary hybridisation more generally.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.