新生儿的眼睛:新生儿重症监护病房工作人员的注意力和情绪如何影响新生儿疼痛评估。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY European Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/ejp.4791
Philipp Deindl, Alexandra Luister, Eik Vettorazzi, Nadine Pointner, Dominique Singer, Angelika Berger, Michael Wagner, Vito Giordano
{"title":"新生儿的眼睛:新生儿重症监护病房工作人员的注意力和情绪如何影响新生儿疼痛评估。","authors":"Philipp Deindl,&nbsp;Alexandra Luister,&nbsp;Eik Vettorazzi,&nbsp;Nadine Pointner,&nbsp;Dominique Singer,&nbsp;Angelika Berger,&nbsp;Michael Wagner,&nbsp;Vito Giordano","doi":"10.1002/ejp.4791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Assessing pain in neonates is crucial for their management but is inherently subjective. This study investigated the effects of visual attention, gaze patterns, and empathic responses of neonatal healthcare professionals on their assessments of neonatal pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Conducted at the Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, we employed eye-tracking to monitor staff's responses to videos depicting neonates experiencing non-noxious thermal, brief noxious, and prolonged noxious stimuli. Videos were presented in two formats: full body view, providing contextual information, and face-only view, lacking contextual details. Pain assessments were measured using a Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS), exploring the impacts of contextual cues, professional experience, and job roles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study found brief and prolonged noxious stimuli eliciting significantly higher FPRS scores compared to non-painful stimuli, with the full body view resulting in higher pain ratings than the face-only view. The mouth region attracted focused attention. Nurses generally reported higher pain scores and exhibited larger pupil diameters compared to physicians, suggesting a stronger empathic response.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This research highlights the essential role of visual cues and empathic responses in neonatal pain assessment, demonstrating how professional roles and stimulus presentation format impact evaluations, and underlining the need for standardised protocols to improve neonatal pain management accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The study emphasises the importance of visual cues and empathy in neonatal pain assessment, highlighting the roles of healthcare professionals and stimulus presentation formats. It addresses challenges in understanding neonatal pain, advocating for standardised protocols. Using eye-tracking technology, the research explores how professionals' visual attention and empathy affect pain evaluations, suggesting more objective assessment methods.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.4791","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eyes on Newborns: How NICU Staff's Attention and Emotions Shape Neonatal Pain Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Deindl,&nbsp;Alexandra Luister,&nbsp;Eik Vettorazzi,&nbsp;Nadine Pointner,&nbsp;Dominique Singer,&nbsp;Angelika Berger,&nbsp;Michael Wagner,&nbsp;Vito Giordano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.4791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Assessing pain in neonates is crucial for their management but is inherently subjective. This study investigated the effects of visual attention, gaze patterns, and empathic responses of neonatal healthcare professionals on their assessments of neonatal pain.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Conducted at the Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, we employed eye-tracking to monitor staff's responses to videos depicting neonates experiencing non-noxious thermal, brief noxious, and prolonged noxious stimuli. Videos were presented in two formats: full body view, providing contextual information, and face-only view, lacking contextual details. Pain assessments were measured using a Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS), exploring the impacts of contextual cues, professional experience, and job roles.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study found brief and prolonged noxious stimuli eliciting significantly higher FPRS scores compared to non-painful stimuli, with the full body view resulting in higher pain ratings than the face-only view. The mouth region attracted focused attention. Nurses generally reported higher pain scores and exhibited larger pupil diameters compared to physicians, suggesting a stronger empathic response.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research highlights the essential role of visual cues and empathic responses in neonatal pain assessment, demonstrating how professional roles and stimulus presentation format impact evaluations, and underlining the need for standardised protocols to improve neonatal pain management accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study emphasises the importance of visual cues and empathy in neonatal pain assessment, highlighting the roles of healthcare professionals and stimulus presentation formats. It addresses challenges in understanding neonatal pain, advocating for standardised protocols. Using eye-tracking technology, the research explores how professionals' visual attention and empathy affect pain evaluations, suggesting more objective assessment methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.4791\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4791\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.4791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估新生儿疼痛对其管理至关重要,但本质上是主观的。本研究调查了新生儿医疗保健专业人员对新生儿疼痛评估的视觉注意、凝视模式和共情反应的影响。方法:在汉堡-埃彭多夫大学医学中心新生儿科进行,我们采用眼动追踪来监测工作人员对描述新生儿经历非有害热刺激、短暂有害刺激和长时间有害刺激的视频的反应。视频以两种格式呈现:全身视图,提供上下文信息;面部视图,缺乏上下文细节。疼痛评估使用面部疼痛评定量表(FPRS)进行测量,探索情境线索、专业经验和工作角色的影响。结果:研究发现,与非疼痛刺激相比,短暂和长时间的有害刺激会引起更高的FPRS评分,全身观比只看脸部观导致更高的疼痛评分。口腔区域吸引了人们的注意力。与医生相比,护士通常报告更高的疼痛评分和更大的瞳孔直径,表明更强的共情反应。结论:本研究强调了视觉线索和共情反应在新生儿疼痛评估中的重要作用,展示了专业角色和刺激呈现格式如何影响评估,并强调了标准化方案的必要性,以提高新生儿疼痛管理的准确性。意义:该研究强调了视觉线索和共情在新生儿疼痛评估中的重要性,强调了医疗保健专业人员和刺激呈现格式的作用。它解决了理解新生儿疼痛的挑战,倡导标准化方案。本研究利用眼动追踪技术,探讨专业人员的视觉注意力和共情对疼痛评估的影响,提出更客观的评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eyes on Newborns: How NICU Staff's Attention and Emotions Shape Neonatal Pain Assessment

Background

Assessing pain in neonates is crucial for their management but is inherently subjective. This study investigated the effects of visual attention, gaze patterns, and empathic responses of neonatal healthcare professionals on their assessments of neonatal pain.

Methods

Conducted at the Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, we employed eye-tracking to monitor staff's responses to videos depicting neonates experiencing non-noxious thermal, brief noxious, and prolonged noxious stimuli. Videos were presented in two formats: full body view, providing contextual information, and face-only view, lacking contextual details. Pain assessments were measured using a Faces Pain Rating Scale (FPRS), exploring the impacts of contextual cues, professional experience, and job roles.

Results

The study found brief and prolonged noxious stimuli eliciting significantly higher FPRS scores compared to non-painful stimuli, with the full body view resulting in higher pain ratings than the face-only view. The mouth region attracted focused attention. Nurses generally reported higher pain scores and exhibited larger pupil diameters compared to physicians, suggesting a stronger empathic response.

Conclusion

This research highlights the essential role of visual cues and empathic responses in neonatal pain assessment, demonstrating how professional roles and stimulus presentation format impact evaluations, and underlining the need for standardised protocols to improve neonatal pain management accuracy.

Significance

The study emphasises the importance of visual cues and empathy in neonatal pain assessment, highlighting the roles of healthcare professionals and stimulus presentation formats. It addresses challenges in understanding neonatal pain, advocating for standardised protocols. Using eye-tracking technology, the research explores how professionals' visual attention and empathy affect pain evaluations, suggesting more objective assessment methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Pain
European Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered. Regular sections in the journal are as follows: • Editorials and Commentaries • Position Papers and Guidelines • Reviews • Original Articles • Letters • Bookshelf The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis. Research articles are published under the following subject headings: • Neurobiology • Neurology • Experimental Pharmacology • Clinical Pharmacology • Psychology • Behavioural Therapy • Epidemiology • Cancer Pain • Acute Pain • Clinical Trials.
期刊最新文献
Activity Patterns and Stress-Prognostic Factors for Pain Persistence and Disability in Acute Neck Pain: A 1-Year Prospective Cohort Study. Changes in Gabapentinoid Use Among Danish Patients With Spinal Pain: A Comparison of Two Secondary Care Cohorts 2013-2014 and 2021-2022. Efficacy of Low-Dose Naltrexone in Women With Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A 12-Month Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Single-Centre Clinical Trial (INNOVA Study) Utility of Vibration Perception Thresholds as a Biomarker of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain in People Living With Obesity: Baseline Multidimensional Profiles, Prevalence and Biopsychosocial Factors From a Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1