精神科医生对2017年《精神卫生保健法》的看法:一项深度试点调查。

Industrial Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_24
Astha, Shruti Srivastava, Indira Sharma
{"title":"精神科医生对2017年《精神卫生保健法》的看法:一项深度试点调查。","authors":"Astha, Shruti Srivastava, Indira Sharma","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mental Health Care Act, 2017 (MHCA, 17) was passed through both houses of the parliament. The Indian Psychiatric Society through its Patient's Rights Task Force committee has been deliberating various rounds of discussion at levels of stakeholders, mental health professionals, and patients' perspective. However, a scarce budget for mental health services, lack of trained mental health professionals, and poor infrastructure and logistics pose a challenge for this new act as still there is a lack of awareness of different provisions of MHCA at the administrative, judiciary, and public levels.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study was undertaken to address the perspectives of psychiatrists related to MHCA,2017 its provisions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was designed to gather information on awareness about MHCA, 2017. The responses were collected from the member psychiatrists of Indian Psychiatric Society in a google form including the suggestions regarding amendments in MHCA, 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22.6% of participants were using MHCA in clinical practice completely, and 20.2% did not use it all. 52.4% stated that they are using it partly. Capacity assessment of the person suffering from mental illness was done by 52.4% of participants in day-to-day clinical practice. 35.7% denied assessing it. With respect to section 309 IPC, 31% were registering and managing suicide attempts as medico legal cases and 63.1% as non-MLC cases. 54.2% of the participants were not aware about medical insurance for mental health. The qualitative data suggest the act should be simplified including relaxation in provisions of minor, capacity assessment and ensure active functioning of various authorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amendments are required in MHCA, 2017 taking into cognizance the opinions from various practicing psychiatrists who are facing hurdles in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":"33 2","pages":"239-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of psychiatrists on Mental Health Care Act, 2017: An in-depth pilot survey.\",\"authors\":\"Astha, Shruti Srivastava, Indira Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mental Health Care Act, 2017 (MHCA, 17) was passed through both houses of the parliament. The Indian Psychiatric Society through its Patient's Rights Task Force committee has been deliberating various rounds of discussion at levels of stakeholders, mental health professionals, and patients' perspective. However, a scarce budget for mental health services, lack of trained mental health professionals, and poor infrastructure and logistics pose a challenge for this new act as still there is a lack of awareness of different provisions of MHCA at the administrative, judiciary, and public levels.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The present study was undertaken to address the perspectives of psychiatrists related to MHCA,2017 its provisions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A self-administered questionnaire was designed to gather information on awareness about MHCA, 2017. The responses were collected from the member psychiatrists of Indian Psychiatric Society in a google form including the suggestions regarding amendments in MHCA, 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>22.6% of participants were using MHCA in clinical practice completely, and 20.2% did not use it all. 52.4% stated that they are using it partly. Capacity assessment of the person suffering from mental illness was done by 52.4% of participants in day-to-day clinical practice. 35.7% denied assessing it. With respect to section 309 IPC, 31% were registering and managing suicide attempts as medico legal cases and 63.1% as non-MLC cases. 54.2% of the participants were not aware about medical insurance for mental health. The qualitative data suggest the act should be simplified including relaxation in provisions of minor, capacity assessment and ensure active functioning of various authorities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Amendments are required in MHCA, 2017 taking into cognizance the opinions from various practicing psychiatrists who are facing hurdles in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Psychiatry Journal\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"239-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784692/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Psychiatry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_54_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2017年《精神卫生保健法》(MHCA, 17)在议会两院获得通过。印度精神病学学会通过其患者权利特别工作组委员会在利益相关者、精神卫生专业人员和患者的角度上审议了多轮讨论。然而,精神卫生服务预算不足,缺乏训练有素的精神卫生专业人员,基础设施和后勤条件差,对这一新法案构成了挑战,因为在行政、司法和公共各级仍然缺乏对《精神卫生保健法》不同规定的认识。目的:本研究旨在解决与MHCA相关的精神科医生的观点,2017年其规定。材料与方法:设计自填问卷,收集2017年MHCA认知信息。从印度精神病学学会的精神科医生成员那里收集的回复以谷歌形式收集,包括关于2017年MHCA修正案的建议。结果:22.6%的参与者在临床实践中完全使用MHCA, 20.2%的参与者完全不使用MHCA。52.4%的人表示他们正在部分使用它。52.4%的参与者在日常临床实践中对精神疾病患者进行了能力评估。35.7%的人否认评估过。关于IPC第309条,31%的人将自杀企图作为医疗法律案件登记和管理,63.1%的人将其作为非mlc案件登记和管理。54.2%的参与者不了解心理健康医疗保险。定性数据表明,应简化该法,包括放宽未成年人、能力评估的规定,并确保各当局的积极运作。结论:考虑到在常规临床实践中面临障碍的各种执业精神科医生的意见,MHCA 2017需要进行修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives of psychiatrists on Mental Health Care Act, 2017: An in-depth pilot survey.

Background: The Mental Health Care Act, 2017 (MHCA, 17) was passed through both houses of the parliament. The Indian Psychiatric Society through its Patient's Rights Task Force committee has been deliberating various rounds of discussion at levels of stakeholders, mental health professionals, and patients' perspective. However, a scarce budget for mental health services, lack of trained mental health professionals, and poor infrastructure and logistics pose a challenge for this new act as still there is a lack of awareness of different provisions of MHCA at the administrative, judiciary, and public levels.

Aim: The present study was undertaken to address the perspectives of psychiatrists related to MHCA,2017 its provisions.

Materials and methods: A self-administered questionnaire was designed to gather information on awareness about MHCA, 2017. The responses were collected from the member psychiatrists of Indian Psychiatric Society in a google form including the suggestions regarding amendments in MHCA, 2017.

Results: 22.6% of participants were using MHCA in clinical practice completely, and 20.2% did not use it all. 52.4% stated that they are using it partly. Capacity assessment of the person suffering from mental illness was done by 52.4% of participants in day-to-day clinical practice. 35.7% denied assessing it. With respect to section 309 IPC, 31% were registering and managing suicide attempts as medico legal cases and 63.1% as non-MLC cases. 54.2% of the participants were not aware about medical insurance for mental health. The qualitative data suggest the act should be simplified including relaxation in provisions of minor, capacity assessment and ensure active functioning of various authorities.

Conclusions: Amendments are required in MHCA, 2017 taking into cognizance the opinions from various practicing psychiatrists who are facing hurdles in routine clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stress and substance abuse - Assessment of psychiatric problems among police personnel. The metabolic paradox of aripiprazole: Weight-neutral in monotherapy but weight-reducing as adjunctive therapy. Theoretical underpinnings of flow and its relation with academic engagement: A narrative review. The Dengue Anxiety Scale (DENAS): A new tool for assessing disease-specific anxiety. Disability, quality of life, and family burden in treatment naïve patients with schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A comparative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1