反映肩胛下肌完全撕裂程度的肌肉力量测量:肩袖撕裂患者的可靠性。

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.201
Wataru Sahara MD, PhD , Keishi Takagi PT , Shuhei Tada PT , Daichi Yamada PT , Hiroki Kiya PT , Hiroto Hanai MD, PhD , Shoji Konda PhD , Seiji Okada MD, PhD
{"title":"反映肩胛下肌完全撕裂程度的肌肉力量测量:肩袖撕裂患者的可靠性。","authors":"Wataru Sahara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keishi Takagi PT ,&nbsp;Shuhei Tada PT ,&nbsp;Daichi Yamada PT ,&nbsp;Hiroki Kiya PT ,&nbsp;Hiroto Hanai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shoji Konda PhD ,&nbsp;Seiji Okada MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While several clinical tests for diagnosing subscapularis (SSC) tears have been reported, no quantitative method reflecting tear size has been established. This study investigated muscle strength measurements that best reflect the extent of SSC tears and clarified their reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 107 patients (111 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears, assessing preoperative and postoperative muscle strength. Isometric internal rotation strength was measured by using a handheld dynamometer using three techniques: the belly-press, Napoleon, and bear-hug techniques. The correlation between the extent of complete SSC tears and preoperative strength for each technique was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Intrarater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1, 3), minimal detectable change (MDC), and MDC% based on three preoperative measurements on the operated side. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using these parameters from measurements on the nonoperated side preoperatively and at 6- and 12-month postoperative intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The correlation coefficient between the extent of SSC tears and the strength of each muscle was approximately −0.45 for all techniques, indicating a weak negative correlation. The intrarater reliability for all techniques showed ICC (1, 3) &gt;0.95, MDC &lt;10 N, and MDC% of approximately 10%. The Napoleon technique demonstrated the highest test-retest reliability, with ICC (3, 1) of 0.87, MDC of 17 N, and MDC% of 21%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Napoleon technique provided more stable muscle exertion than the other methods. The results may aid in determining whether postoperative muscle strength recovery falls within the range of measurement error.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle strength measurements reflecting the extent of complete subscapularis tears: reliability in patients with rotator cuff tears\",\"authors\":\"Wataru Sahara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Keishi Takagi PT ,&nbsp;Shuhei Tada PT ,&nbsp;Daichi Yamada PT ,&nbsp;Hiroki Kiya PT ,&nbsp;Hiroto Hanai MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shoji Konda PhD ,&nbsp;Seiji Okada MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.08.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While several clinical tests for diagnosing subscapularis (SSC) tears have been reported, no quantitative method reflecting tear size has been established. This study investigated muscle strength measurements that best reflect the extent of SSC tears and clarified their reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 107 patients (111 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears, assessing preoperative and postoperative muscle strength. Isometric internal rotation strength was measured by using a handheld dynamometer using three techniques: the belly-press, Napoleon, and bear-hug techniques. The correlation between the extent of complete SSC tears and preoperative strength for each technique was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Intrarater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1, 3), minimal detectable change (MDC), and MDC% based on three preoperative measurements on the operated side. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using these parameters from measurements on the nonoperated side preoperatively and at 6- and 12-month postoperative intervals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The correlation coefficient between the extent of SSC tears and the strength of each muscle was approximately −0.45 for all techniques, indicating a weak negative correlation. The intrarater reliability for all techniques showed ICC (1, 3) &gt;0.95, MDC &lt;10 N, and MDC% of approximately 10%. The Napoleon technique demonstrated the highest test-retest reliability, with ICC (3, 1) of 0.87, MDC of 17 N, and MDC% of 21%.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Napoleon technique provided more stable muscle exertion than the other methods. The results may aid in determining whether postoperative muscle strength recovery falls within the range of measurement error.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 109-115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324003931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324003931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然已经报道了几种诊断肩胛下肌(SSC)撕裂的临床试验,但尚未建立反映撕裂大小的定量方法。本研究调查了最能反映SSC撕裂程度的肌肉力量测量,并澄清了其可靠性。方法:我们分析了107例(111肩)接受关节镜手术治疗肩袖撕裂的患者,评估术前和术后肌肉力量。等距内旋强度是用手持式测力计测量的,使用了三种技术:腹部按压、拿破仑和熊抱技术。采用Spearman等级相关系数评估SSC完全撕裂程度与术前强度之间的相关性。采用组内相关系数(ICC)(1,3)、最小可检测变化(MDC)和基于手术侧三个术前测量的MDC%来评估组内可靠性。使用术前和术后6个月和12个月非手术侧测量的这些参数评估测试-重测可靠性。结果:在所有技术中,SSC撕裂程度与每块肌肉的力量之间的相关系数约为-0.45,表明弱负相关。各技术的内部信度均为ICC (1,3) >0.95, MDC。结论:拿破仑技术比其他方法提供更稳定的肌肉运动。结果可能有助于确定术后肌力恢复是否在测量误差范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Muscle strength measurements reflecting the extent of complete subscapularis tears: reliability in patients with rotator cuff tears

Background

While several clinical tests for diagnosing subscapularis (SSC) tears have been reported, no quantitative method reflecting tear size has been established. This study investigated muscle strength measurements that best reflect the extent of SSC tears and clarified their reliability.

Methods

We analyzed 107 patients (111 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears, assessing preoperative and postoperative muscle strength. Isometric internal rotation strength was measured by using a handheld dynamometer using three techniques: the belly-press, Napoleon, and bear-hug techniques. The correlation between the extent of complete SSC tears and preoperative strength for each technique was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Intrarater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1, 3), minimal detectable change (MDC), and MDC% based on three preoperative measurements on the operated side. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using these parameters from measurements on the nonoperated side preoperatively and at 6- and 12-month postoperative intervals.

Results

The correlation coefficient between the extent of SSC tears and the strength of each muscle was approximately −0.45 for all techniques, indicating a weak negative correlation. The intrarater reliability for all techniques showed ICC (1, 3) >0.95, MDC <10 N, and MDC% of approximately 10%. The Napoleon technique demonstrated the highest test-retest reliability, with ICC (3, 1) of 0.87, MDC of 17 N, and MDC% of 21%.

Conclusion

The Napoleon technique provided more stable muscle exertion than the other methods. The results may aid in determining whether postoperative muscle strength recovery falls within the range of measurement error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-term clinical and radiological outcome of the uncemented isoelastic monoblock Affinis Glenoid vitamys in stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study Dynamic digital radiography is a valid and reliable alternative to 3 Dimensional registration for scapulohumeral rhythm analysis A combined logistic regression and decision tree analysis of factors influencing throwing velocity and accuracy in little league baseball players Does lateralization and distalization affect revision rates and patient experience in primary stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery: citation trends, evidence levels, and scholarly impact
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1