肩关节前凸和变形对前肩稳定性的临床影响。

Q2 Medicine JSES International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.029
Sebastian Oenning MD , Clara de Castillo , Elena Jacob MD , Arne Riegel MD , Philipp A. Michel MD , Jens Wermers MSc , Michael J. Raschke MD , J. Christoph Katthagen MD
{"title":"肩关节前凸和变形对前肩稳定性的临床影响。","authors":"Sebastian Oenning MD ,&nbsp;Clara de Castillo ,&nbsp;Elena Jacob MD ,&nbsp;Arne Riegel MD ,&nbsp;Philipp A. Michel MD ,&nbsp;Jens Wermers MSc ,&nbsp;Michael J. Raschke MD ,&nbsp;J. Christoph Katthagen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent biomechanical studies, the importance of glenoid concavity and version for anterior shoulder stability has been highlighted. With this study, we aimed to assess their clinical relevance as stabilizing factors. We hypothesized that low glenoid concavity and low retroversion are associated with anterior glenohumeral instability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center, retrospective case-control study, computed tomography scans of n = 34 patients following acute anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocation between 2015 and 2021 were included. Patients with glenoid fractures and pre-existing glenohumeral pathologies were excluded. In the control group, n = 68 polytrauma patients referred to our level-I-trauma center were included, who showed neither acute nor chronic glenohumeral pathologies. Both groups were matched age- and gender-specifically in a 2:1 ratio. Glenoid concavity was measured according to the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction. Version was measured by the glenoid vault method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The instability cohort presented with a lower BSSR (SI) compared to the control group (49.8% vs. 56.9%, <em>P</em> = .001). The BSSR (AP) did not differ significantly (30.2% vs. 33.7%, <em>P</em> = .163). A higher retroversion was seen in the instability cohort (−13.1° vs. −11.4°; <em>P</em> = .041). Subgroup analyses showed higher BSSR (SI) in ≥60-year-old patients compared to ≤30-year-old patients. BSSR (AP) and glenoid version did neither differ age- nor gender-specifically.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Glenoid concavity is a relevant factor for anterior shoulder stability in the clinical setting. In contrast to recent biomechanical studies, glenoid version appears to have only limited clinical impact on anterior stability. Regarding the individual treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability, glenoid concavity should be focused on as an essential bony stabilizing factor.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 1","pages":"Pages 62-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784467/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The clinical impact of glenoid concavity and version on anterior shoulder stability\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Oenning MD ,&nbsp;Clara de Castillo ,&nbsp;Elena Jacob MD ,&nbsp;Arne Riegel MD ,&nbsp;Philipp A. Michel MD ,&nbsp;Jens Wermers MSc ,&nbsp;Michael J. Raschke MD ,&nbsp;J. Christoph Katthagen MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.09.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In recent biomechanical studies, the importance of glenoid concavity and version for anterior shoulder stability has been highlighted. With this study, we aimed to assess their clinical relevance as stabilizing factors. We hypothesized that low glenoid concavity and low retroversion are associated with anterior glenohumeral instability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center, retrospective case-control study, computed tomography scans of n = 34 patients following acute anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocation between 2015 and 2021 were included. Patients with glenoid fractures and pre-existing glenohumeral pathologies were excluded. In the control group, n = 68 polytrauma patients referred to our level-I-trauma center were included, who showed neither acute nor chronic glenohumeral pathologies. Both groups were matched age- and gender-specifically in a 2:1 ratio. Glenoid concavity was measured according to the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction. Version was measured by the glenoid vault method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The instability cohort presented with a lower BSSR (SI) compared to the control group (49.8% vs. 56.9%, <em>P</em> = .001). The BSSR (AP) did not differ significantly (30.2% vs. 33.7%, <em>P</em> = .163). A higher retroversion was seen in the instability cohort (−13.1° vs. −11.4°; <em>P</em> = .041). Subgroup analyses showed higher BSSR (SI) in ≥60-year-old patients compared to ≤30-year-old patients. BSSR (AP) and glenoid version did neither differ age- nor gender-specifically.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Glenoid concavity is a relevant factor for anterior shoulder stability in the clinical setting. In contrast to recent biomechanical studies, glenoid version appears to have only limited clinical impact on anterior stability. Regarding the individual treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability, glenoid concavity should be focused on as an essential bony stabilizing factor.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 62-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784467/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324004407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在最近的生物力学研究中,突出了肩关节前凸和弯曲对肩关节稳定性的重要性。通过这项研究,我们旨在评估它们作为稳定因素的临床相关性。我们假设低盂内凹和低盂内翻与盂肱前侧不稳定有关。方法:在这项单中心回顾性病例对照研究中,纳入了2015年至2021年间n = 34例急性前下盂肱脱位患者的计算机断层扫描。排除有肩胛骨折和已有肩关节病变的患者。在对照组中,我们的i级创伤中心纳入了n = 68例多发创伤患者,他们既没有出现急性也没有出现慢性肩关节病变。两组按年龄和性别按2:1的比例进行匹配。根据前后(AP)和上下(SI)方向骨肩稳定比(BSSR)测量关节盂凹陷度。通过关节盂拱顶法测量关节屈曲度。结果:与对照组相比,不稳定组的BSSR (SI)较低(49.8%比56.9%,P = .001)。BSSR (AP)差异无统计学意义(30.2% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.163)。在不稳定组中观察到更高的逆行度(-13.1°vs -11.4°;P = .041)。亚组分析显示,≥60岁患者的BSSR (SI)高于≤30岁患者。BSSR (AP)和关节盂版本没有年龄和性别差异。结论:关节盂凹度是影响肩关节前稳定性的一个重要因素。与最近的生物力学研究相反,关节盂内翻对前路稳定性的临床影响似乎有限。对于肱骨前关节不稳的个体化治疗,应将盂内凹作为重要的骨稳定因素加以重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The clinical impact of glenoid concavity and version on anterior shoulder stability

Background

In recent biomechanical studies, the importance of glenoid concavity and version for anterior shoulder stability has been highlighted. With this study, we aimed to assess their clinical relevance as stabilizing factors. We hypothesized that low glenoid concavity and low retroversion are associated with anterior glenohumeral instability.

Methods

In this single-center, retrospective case-control study, computed tomography scans of n = 34 patients following acute anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocation between 2015 and 2021 were included. Patients with glenoid fractures and pre-existing glenohumeral pathologies were excluded. In the control group, n = 68 polytrauma patients referred to our level-I-trauma center were included, who showed neither acute nor chronic glenohumeral pathologies. Both groups were matched age- and gender-specifically in a 2:1 ratio. Glenoid concavity was measured according to the bony shoulder stability ratio (BSSR) in anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) direction. Version was measured by the glenoid vault method.

Results

The instability cohort presented with a lower BSSR (SI) compared to the control group (49.8% vs. 56.9%, P = .001). The BSSR (AP) did not differ significantly (30.2% vs. 33.7%, P = .163). A higher retroversion was seen in the instability cohort (−13.1° vs. −11.4°; P = .041). Subgroup analyses showed higher BSSR (SI) in ≥60-year-old patients compared to ≤30-year-old patients. BSSR (AP) and glenoid version did neither differ age- nor gender-specifically.

Conclusion

Glenoid concavity is a relevant factor for anterior shoulder stability in the clinical setting. In contrast to recent biomechanical studies, glenoid version appears to have only limited clinical impact on anterior stability. Regarding the individual treatment of anterior glenohumeral instability, glenoid concavity should be focused on as an essential bony stabilizing factor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-term clinical and radiological outcome of the uncemented isoelastic monoblock Affinis Glenoid vitamys in stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study Dynamic digital radiography is a valid and reliable alternative to 3 Dimensional registration for scapulohumeral rhythm analysis A combined logistic regression and decision tree analysis of factors influencing throwing velocity and accuracy in little league baseball players Does lateralization and distalization affect revision rates and patient experience in primary stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? Optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome score is a strong predictor of shoulder pain and function in glenohumeral osteoarthritis and rotator cuff arthropathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1