世界需要更多的传统能源吗?ESG活动、自由现金流和资本市场影响的比较分析

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103919
Huijing Li , Danjue Clancey-Shang , Chengbo Fu , Tianze Li
{"title":"世界需要更多的传统能源吗?ESG活动、自由现金流和资本市场影响的比较分析","authors":"Huijing Li ,&nbsp;Danjue Clancey-Shang ,&nbsp;Chengbo Fu ,&nbsp;Tianze Li","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we examine the ESG performance of traditional energy firms relative to their non-energy counterparts. Our findings reveal that energy firms outperform non-energy firms in ESG metrics. Within the energy sector, firms in the USA and Europe lead in ESG performance, while those in Japan, Australia, India, and China trail. These results hold even after controlling for other firm characteristics and remain robust to Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. Additionally, we identify financial flexibility as a key driver of this relationship. Specifically, the positive association between being an energy firm and higher ESG performance is more pronounced in firms with greater net cash flow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 103919"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the world need more traditional energy? A comparative analysis of ESG activities, free cash flow, and capital market implications\",\"authors\":\"Huijing Li ,&nbsp;Danjue Clancey-Shang ,&nbsp;Chengbo Fu ,&nbsp;Tianze Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.irfa.2025.103919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this paper, we examine the ESG performance of traditional energy firms relative to their non-energy counterparts. Our findings reveal that energy firms outperform non-energy firms in ESG metrics. Within the energy sector, firms in the USA and Europe lead in ESG performance, while those in Japan, Australia, India, and China trail. These results hold even after controlling for other firm characteristics and remain robust to Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. Additionally, we identify financial flexibility as a key driver of this relationship. Specifically, the positive association between being an energy firm and higher ESG performance is more pronounced in firms with greater net cash flow.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Financial Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925000067\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521925000067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们考察了传统能源公司相对于非能源公司的ESG绩效。我们的研究结果显示,能源公司在ESG指标上的表现优于非能源公司。在能源行业,美国和欧洲的公司在ESG绩效方面领先,而日本、澳大利亚、印度和中国的公司则落后。这些结果甚至在控制了其他公司特征后仍然有效,并且对倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析保持稳健。此外,我们认为财务灵活性是这种关系的关键驱动因素。具体而言,在净现金流量较大的公司中,能源公司与较高ESG绩效之间的正相关关系更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the world need more traditional energy? A comparative analysis of ESG activities, free cash flow, and capital market implications
In this paper, we examine the ESG performance of traditional energy firms relative to their non-energy counterparts. Our findings reveal that energy firms outperform non-energy firms in ESG metrics. Within the energy sector, firms in the USA and Europe lead in ESG performance, while those in Japan, Australia, India, and China trail. These results hold even after controlling for other firm characteristics and remain robust to Propensity Score Matching (PSM) analysis. Additionally, we identify financial flexibility as a key driver of this relationship. Specifically, the positive association between being an energy firm and higher ESG performance is more pronounced in firms with greater net cash flow.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Green alchemy: Transforming market signals into sustainable portfolio investments Does oil price uncertainty relate to sustainable finance? Evidence from green bonds and clean energy equities Judicial transparency and trade credit financing: Evidence from mass court judgment disclosure Market sentiment, risk spillover, and the heterogeneous performance of stablecoins: Evidence from cross-quantile analysis and network connectedness Small hands, big losses: Stock market reactions to child labor abuse news
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1